Nephrologists’ Perspectives on Defining and Applying Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN

Allison Tong² 

[1] and..§§Crowe Associates Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom..*Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;*Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;Departments of **Medicine and..††Community Health Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;§Centre for Nephrology, University College London, London, United Kingdom;¶Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;‖Renal Division, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium;‡Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;‡‡Polycystic Kidney Disease International, London, United Kingdom

关键词: hemodialysis;    qualitative research;    Australia;    Austria;    Belgium;    Canada;    Chronic Disease;    Comorbidity;    Decision Making;    Germany;    Goals;    Great Britain;    Humans;    nephrology;    New Zealand;    Patient Selection;    Patient-Centered Care;    Physician-Patient Relations;    quality of life;    renal dialysis;    Singapore;    Uncertainty;    United States;   

DOI  :  10.2215/CJN.08370816

学科分类：泌尿医学

来源: American Society of Nephrology

【 摘 要 】

Background and objectives Patient centeredness is widely advocated as a cornerstone of health care, but it is yet to be fully realized, including in nephrology. Our study aims to describe nephrologists’ perspectives on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 58 nephrologists from 27 dialysis units across nine countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Singapore, and New Zealand. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.Results We identified five themes on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis: explicitly prioritized by patients (articulated preferences and goals, ascertaining treatment burden, defining hemodialysis success, distinguishing a physician-patient dichotomy, and supporting shared decision making), optimizing wellbeing (respecting patient choice, focusing on symptomology, perceptible and tangible, and judging relevance and consequence), comprehending extensive heterogeneity of clinical and quality of life outcomes (distilling diverse priorities, highly individualized, attempting to specify outcomes, and broadening context), clinically hamstrung (professional deficiency, uncertainty and complexity in measurement, beyond medical purview, specificity of care, mechanistic mindset [focused on biochemical targets and comorbidities], avoiding alarm, and paradoxical dilemma), and undermined by system pressures (adhering to overarching policies, misalignment with mandates, and resource constraints).Conclusions Improving patient-centered outcomes is regarded by nephrologists to encompass strategies that address patient goals and improve wellbeing and treatment burden in patients on hemodialysis. However, efforts are hampered by ambiguities about how to prioritize, measure, and manage the plethora of critical comorbidities and broader quality of life outcomes in a care setting that is technically demanding and driven by biochemical targets. Identifying critical patient–important outcomes and mechanisms for integrating them into practice may help to deliver patient-centered care in hemodialysis and other chronic disease settings.Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2017_02_28_Tong.mp3

【 授权许可】

CC BY