Российская государственность. 2017

Pravoprimenenie

Александр Владимирович Бутаков¹ 

[1] Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского

关键词: Российская государственность;    индустриализация;    норматив- ный структурализм;    способы организации собственности;    их социальные функции;    политико- правовой режим;   

DOI  :  10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(3).15-24

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Dostoevsky Omsk State University

【 摘 要 】

The subject. The author's research methodology of social processes is represented, by establishing a bond between the ways of property organization and governmental form – especially its political regime. The analysis of methodology is based on the historical materials devoted to Russian statehood in terms of its transition states during the appropriate industrialization of domestic production. The results, scope of application. Since 1861, the Russian statehood during its existence has experienced a number of important transitional states, where the successful process of forming the traditional foundations of the corresponding society in different periods (pre- Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet) in terms of the author's methodology was and still is untenable. The basis of this methodology is the existing relationship between the concrete way of property organization and its social function. Thus, a private way of property organization reproduces the function of social development. A mixed (corporate) way provides a function of social compromise (convergence). Finally, the common (collective) way of property organization can be determined by the function of social security. A concrete way of property organization arries out only a specific social function. An attempt to change this dependence leads the corresponding society to the destruction of the foundations of its existence. Thus, the liquidation (abolition) of the private way of property organization objectively forms the impossibility of realizing the functions of social development and the functions of social compromise (convergence) in the society by the common (collective) way of its organization. There is another aspect of the relationship between a particular way of organizing property and its social function. Each of the above methods of property organization, reaching a monopoly state that goes into rent, provides for self-destruction and transformation of its social function as opposed to: from development to degradation, from compromise to confrontation, from social provision of society to the provision of clans. A brief historical digression in the article makes it possible to disclose the content of this methodology when analyzing the facts of life of Russian statehood, including its latest history until 2017.Conclusions. The modern post-Soviet statehood in its various foundations: economic, political, social and cultural, when realizing the appropriate tendencies of segregation of the private way of property organization and the growing monopolization of state property, largely casts doubt on the future development of our society.

【 授权许可】

CC BY