| Frontiers in Psychology | |
| Similarity of wh-Phrases and Acceptability Variation in wh-Islands | |
| Emily Atkinson1  | |
| 关键词: relativized minimality; wh-island; D-linking; acceptability judgment; amelioration; similarity interference; | |
| DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02048 | |
| 学科分类:心理学(综合) | |
| 来源: Frontiers | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
In wh-questions that form a syntactic dependency between the fronted wh-phrase and its thematic position, acceptability is severely degraded when the dependency crosses another wh-phrase. It is well known that the acceptability degradation in wh-island violation ameliorates in certain contexts, but the source of this variation remains poorly understood. In the syntax literature, an influential theory – Featural Relativized Minimality – has argued that the wh-island effect is modulated exclusively by the distinctness of morpho-syntactic features in the two wh-phrases, but psycholinguistic theories of memory encoding and retrieval mechanisms predict that semantic properties of wh-phrases should also contribute to wh-island amelioration. We report four acceptability judgment experiments that systematically investigate the role of morpho-syntactic and semantic features in wh-island violations. The results indicate that the distribution of wh-island amelioration is best explained by an account that incorporates the distinctness of morpho-syntactic features as well as the semantic denotation of the wh-phrases. We argue that an integration of syntactic theories and perspectives from psycholinguistics can enrich our understanding of acceptability variation in wh-dependencies.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201904029368639ZK.pdf | 1059KB |
PDF