SAGE Open Medicine | |
The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities: | |
David CReardon1  | |
关键词: Abortion mental health; abortion; reproductive health; post-abortion trauma; research bias; complicated grief; ambiguous loss; bereavement; post-traumatic stress disorder; pregnancy loss; | |
DOI : 10.1177/2050312118807624 | |
学科分类:医学(综合) | |
来源: Sage Journals | |
【 摘 要 】
The abortion and mental health controversy is driven by two different perspectives regarding how best to interpret accepted facts. When interpreting the data, abortion and mental health proponents are inclined to emphasize risks associated with abortion, whereas abortion and mental health minimalists emphasize pre-existing risk factors as the primary explanation for the correlations with more negative outcomes. Still, both sides agree that (a) abortion is consistently associated with elevated rates of mental illness compared to women without a history of abortion; (b) the abortion experience directly contributes to mental health problems for at least some women; (c) there are risk factors, such as pre-existing mental illness, that identify women at greatest risk of mental health problems after an abortion; and (d) it is impossible to conduct research in this field in a manner that can definitively identify the extent to which any mental illnesses following abortion can be reliably attributed to abortion i...
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201904028957789ZK.pdf | 4318KB | download |