期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Psychology
Cultural Differences in Answerability Judgments
Bodil S. A. Karlsson1 
关键词: answerability;    judgment;    answerability judgments;    knowledge questions;    confidence judgments;    cross-cultural comparison;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01641
学科分类:心理学(综合)
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Judgments about whether anyone can provide a relevant and correct answer to a question are called answerability judgments. Such judgements can be important in societal planning and decision making and may vary in different cultural contexts. Six hundred participants in each of China, India, and Sweden made answerability judgments of six difficult knowledge questions. For each question, they choose between three options indicating that they thought the question was answerable and a fourth option: “Nobody can answer that question.” After each question, they rated their confidence that their judgment was correct. Choosing “Nobody can answer that question” was significantly more common for the Swedes and was uncommon in the Asian samples. The Asian samples showed higher confidence in their judgments. We suggest that these differences may be explained by results from cross-cultural research, but this study did not investigate specific mechanisms. Hence, more research is needed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201904026953969ZK.pdf 718KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:5次