期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Built Environment
Closed-Form Dynamic Stability Criterion for Elastic–Plastic Structures under Near-Fault Ground Motions
Takewaki, Izuru1  Kojima, Kotaro1 
[1]Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan
关键词: Earthquake Response;    Critical response;    Elastic-plastic response;    P-delta effect;    dynamic stability;    Dynamic collapse;    Near-fault ground motion;    double impulse;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fbuil.2016.00006
学科分类:建筑学
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】
A dynamic stability criterion for elastic-plastic structures under near-fault ground motions is derived in closed-form. A negative post-yield stiffness is treated in order to consider the P-delta effect. The double impulse is used as a substitute of the fling-step near-fault ground motion. Since only the free-vibration appears under such double impulse, the energy approach plays a critical role in the derivation of the closed-form solution of a complicated elastic-plastic response of structures with the P-delta effect. It is remarkable that no iteration is needed in the derivation of the closed-form dynamic stability criterion on the critical elastic-plastic response. It is shown via the closed-form expression that several patterns of unstable behaviors exist depending on the ratio of the input level of the double impulse to the structural strength and on the ratio of the negative post-yield stiffness to the initial elastic stiffness. The validity of the proposed dynamic stability criterion is investigated by the numerical response analysis for structures under double impulses with stable or unstable parameters. Furthermore the reliability of the proposed theory is tested through the comparison with the response analysis to the corresponding one-cycle sinusoidal input as a representative of the fling-step near-fault ground motion. The applicability of the proposed theory to actual recorded pulse-type ground motions is also discussed.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201904026483786ZK.pdf 2256KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:23次