| Frontiers in Psychology | |
| Using item response theory to investigate the structure of anticipated affect: do self-reports about future affective reactions conform to typical or maximal models? | |
| Leonidas A. Zampetakis1  | |
| 关键词: anticipated affect; unfolding; item response theory; ideal point models; dominance models; | |
| DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01438 | |
| 学科分类:心理学(综合) | |
| 来源: Frontiers | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
In the present research, we used item response theory (IRT) to examine whether effective predictions (anticipated affect) conforms to a typical (i.e., what people usually do) or a maximal behavior process (i.e., what people can do). The former, correspond to non-monotonic ideal point IRT models, whereas the latter correspond to monotonic dominance IRT models. A convenience, cross-sectional student sample (N = 1624) was used. Participants were asked to report on anticipated positive and negative affect around a hypothetical event (emotions surrounding the start of a new business). We carried out analysis comparing graded response model (GRM), a dominance IRT model, against generalized graded unfolding model, an unfolding IRT model. We found that the GRM provided a better fit to the data. Findings suggest that the self-report responses to anticipated affect conform to dominance response process (i.e., maximal behavior). The paper also discusses implications for a growing literature on anticipated affect.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201904026368818ZK.pdf | 841KB |
PDF