Energy security and pattern of regional conflicts in Eurasia: From a constructive framework of analysis

Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies

Nalin Mohapatra¹ 

关键词: academic publishing;    scientific research;    science;    humanities;    social science;    engineering;    mathematics;    peer review;    society publishing;    university press;    authors;    reviewers;    editors;    cloud-based systems;    XML;   

DOI  :  10.22261/CJES.UQ2OTI

学科分类：地球科学(综合)

来源: Veruscript

【 摘 要 】

The term energy security is undergoing a sea change from a state-centric economic conception to a sociological one. The definitional aspect is undergoing a transformation because of the changing pattern of relations between “energy producing and consuming states” along with “transit states”. Eurasia is one such region where the broader definition of energy security can be applicable. The existence of historically rooted social conflicts like Chechnya, South Ossetia, Crimea, “simmering discontent” in Siberia and Far East, and primordial apprehensions between ethnic groups (Armenian and Azeri) in Nagorno Karabakh are providing a structural basis for the accentuation of regional conflicts. Most of these conflicts are taking place in Eurasia due to existence of natural resources like energy. Often competition over controlling transportation corridor is also generating societal tension. Some of these trajectories are putting this geopolitical space into a “cauldron.” Against this backdrop, Constructivism is emerging as a major theoretical approach to study the securitization processes in Eurasia.

【 授权许可】

CC BY