Судебная защита прав потерпевшего (банка-кредитора) после заключения им договора уступки права (требова банкротства должниканий) в условиях преднамеренного

Pravoprimenenie

Юрий Владимирович Трунцевский¹ 

[1] Институт законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве Российской ФедерацииАкадемия управления МВД России

关键词: Преднамеренное банкротство;    уступка прав требований;    кредитор;    банк;    должник;    гражданский иск;    уголовно-правовые отношения;   

DOI  :  10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(3).150-159

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Dostoevsky Omsk State University

【 摘 要 】

The subject of analysis in the paper is Russian insolvency legislation? As well as rules of Russian Criminal Code about insolvency crimes. The purpose of the article is to analyze methods of the judicial protection of the rights of the victim (creditor-bank) after the conclusion of the contract of cession of rights (claims) in the context of deliberate bankruptcy of the debtor. The methodology of research includes: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, survey, and statistical method. The results, scope of application. Intentional bankruptcy (Art. 196 of the Russian Criminal Code) violates the legitimate property interests of creditors. In particular, the Bank has the right to appeal to law enforcement agencies with a statement about criminal acts committed against the Bank that caused damage to the Bank. The creditor has the right to apply for recognition as an injured person. Such a creditor is harmed by a crime. In the event that the Bank deliberately bankruptcy of the debtor harmed, and there is a causal relationship between such actions and the socially dangerous consequences that have occurred, then, as follows from Part 1 of Art. 44 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this circumstance is a prerequisite for the recognition of the Bank as a civil plaintiff. Such a bank has the right to declare in the criminal case a civil claim for damages to the bank. The purpose of this article is to provide judicial protection of the rights of the victim (creditor bank) after concluding the contract of assignment of the right (claims) in the circumstances of the debtor's deliberate bankruptcy. The research methods are: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, questioning and statistical method. The conclusion is drawn that the assignment of claims under a civil law contract is not grounds for refusing to recognize the Bank as a victim and a civil plaintiff in a criminal case under Art. 196 of the Criminal Code.Conclusions. The assignment of claims under civil contract is not a ground for refusing recognition the Bank as the victim and civil plaintiff in a criminal case under Arti. 196 of the Criminal Code.

【 授权许可】

CC BY