Frontiers in Psychology | |
To characterize contrast detection, noise should be extended, not localized | |
Rémy Allard1  | |
关键词: external noise paradigm; extended noise; 0D noise; contrast detection; contrast discrimination; | |
DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00749 | |
学科分类:心理学(综合) | |
来源: Frontiers | |
【 摘 要 】
Adding noise to a stimulus is useful to characterize visual processing. To avoid triggering a processing strategy shift between the processing in low and high noise, Allard and Cavanagh (2011) recommended using noise that is extended as a function of all dimensions such as space, time, frequency and orientation. Contrariwise, to avoid cross-channel suppression affecting contrast detection, Baker and Meese (2012) suggested using noise that is localized as a function of all dimensions, namely “0D noise,” which basically consists in randomly jittering the target contrast (and, for blank intervals or catch trials, jittering the contrast of an identical zero-contrast signal). Here we argue that contrast thresholds in extended noise are not contaminated by noise-induced cross-channel suppression because contrast gains affect signal and noise by the same proportion leaving the signal-to-noise ratio intact. We also review empirical findings showing that detecting a target in 0D noise involves a different processing strategy than detecting in absence of noise or in extended noise. Given that internal noise is extended as a function of all dimensions, we therefore recommend using external noise that is also extended as a function of all dimensions when assuming that the same processing strategy operates in low and high noise.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201904024584135ZK.pdf | 880KB | download |