Who protects participants in non-inferiority trials when the outcome is death?:

Research Ethics

WalterPalmas¹ 

关键词: ethics in clinical research;    human subject protection;    non-inferiority clinical trials;   

DOI  :  10.1177/1747016118764304

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: Sage Journals

【 摘 要 】

A non-inferiority design accepts the possibility of some efficacy loss, as part of a “successful”, statistically significant result. That loss may be excessive when the non-inferiority threshold is lenient. However, even stringent significance thresholds and safety monitoring may fail to adequately protect study participants when the primary outcome is death. The OPTIMAAL trial, a large randomized clinical trial performed in high-risk patients, is discussed as an example, using the Belmont Report principles as an ethical frame of reference. OPTIMAAL compared losartan, a new drug, to captopril, a drug known to reduce the risk of death in patients with heart failure after a myocardial infarction. Serious ethical challenges occurred in that study. Firstly, subjects had to tolerate captopril to participate, meaning that participation implied the possibility of higher risk of death if randomized to the losartan arm, as compared to the standard of care. Additionally, the stopping rules had to ensure enough powe...

【 授权许可】

CC BY