期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Psychology
An Alternative Approach to Analyze Ipsative Data. Revisiting Experiential Learning Theory
Joan M. Batista-Foguet1 
关键词: ipsative data;    Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (KLSI);    compositional data analysis (CODA);    emotional and social competencies;    philosophical orientation;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01742
学科分类:心理学(综合)
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The ritualistic use of statistical models regardless of the type of data actually available is a common practice across disciplines which we dare to call type zero error. Statistical models involve a series of assumptions whose existence is often neglected altogether, this is specially the case with ipsative data. This paper illustrates the consequences of this ritualistic practice within Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) operationalized through its Learning Style Inventory (KLSI). We show how using a well-known methodology in other disciplines—compositional data analysis (CODA) and log ratio transformations—KLSI data can be properly analyzed. In addition, the method has theoretical implications: a third dimension of the KLSI is unveiled providing room for future research. This third dimension describes an individual's relative preference for learning by prehension rather than by transformation. Using a sample of international MBA students, we relate this dimension with another self-assessment instrument, the Philosophical Orientation Questionnaire (POQ), and with an observer-assessed instrument, the Emotional and Social Competency Inventory (ESCI-U). Both show plausible statistical relationships. An intellectual operating philosophy (IOP) is linked to a preference for prehension, whereas a pragmatic operating philosophy (POP) is linked to transformation. Self-management and social awareness competencies are linked to a learning preference for transforming knowledge, whereas relationship management and cognitive competencies are more related to approaching learning by prehension.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201904022250353ZK.pdf 785KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:11次