| Frontiers in Psychology | |
| Route-planning and the comparative study of future-thinking | |
| James M. Thom1  | |
| 关键词: mental time travel; navigation behavior; future thinking; chimpanzees; comparative cognition; | |
| DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00144 | |
| 学科分类:心理学(综合) | |
| 来源: Frontiers | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Research into planning in non-human animals has often focused on anticipation of future needs, with falsification of the “Bischof-Köhler hypothesis” as the gold standard. This hypothesis states that non-human animals are unable to dissociate from the present in order to consider their future drives (Suddendorf and Corballis, 1997). The Bischof-Köhler criterion is intended as a test of constructive future-thinking (or “mental time travel”), in which the future is pre-experienced in the mind's eye (Atance and O'Neill, 2001). Pre-experiencing future scenarios should, the argument goes, allow the motivational drives associated with those scenarios to influence present behavior.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201904020976674ZK.pdf | 296KB |
PDF