| Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare | |
| Observational in-vitro study comparing the efficacy of fluid warming devices: Ranger© 24500 versus ANIMEC AM-2S: | |
| See SeongChang1  | |
| 关键词: Anaesthesia; equipment; hypothermia; infusions; warmer; | |
| DOI : 10.1177/2010105817743266 | |
| 学科分类:医学(综合) | |
| 来源: Sage Journals | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background:Intraoperative hypothermia is detrimental to the patient. This, however, can be minimized with infusion of warmed fluids.Objectives:We investigated the warming capabilities of the Ranger© 24500 (Ranger) and ANIMEC AM-2S (ANIMEC) at various low infusion rates. We also examined the use of two ANIMEC warmers placed in series along the intravenous tubing.Methods:We had three comparative trial groups for our experiment. Trial group 1 involved the use of an ANIMEC fluid warmer. Trial group 2 involved the use of two ANIMEC fluid warmers placed in series. Trial group 3 involved the use of the Ranger. Three different infusion rates (1 ml/min, 5 ml/min and 10 ml/min) were examined.Results:The use of two ANIMEC fluid warmers delivered the warmest fluid in all three study infusion rates. The mean (SD) delivered temperature was 24.11 (0.62)°C at 1 ml/min, 29.59 (0.10)°C at 5 ml/min and 29.27 (0.10)°C at 10 ml/min. The Ranger delivered the lowest temperatures at infusion rates of 1 ml/min and 5 ml/min. The m...
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201904020244324ZK.pdf | 239KB |
PDF