期刊论文详细信息
Journal of vision
Inferring the stiffness of unfamiliar objects from optical, shape, and motion cues
Roland W. Fleming1  Jan Jaap R. van Assen1  Vivian C. Paulun1  Filipp Schmidt1 
[1] Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
关键词: cues;    motion;    optics;    perception;    shape;   
DOI  :  10.1167/17.3.18
学科分类:眼科学
来源: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Visually inferring the stiffness of objects is important for many tasks but is challenging because, unlike optical properties (e.g., gloss), mechanical properties do not directly affect image values. Stiffness must be inferred either (a) by recognizing materials and recalling their properties (associative approach) or (b) from shape and motion cues when the material is deformed (estimation approach). Here, we investigated interactions between these two inference types. Participants viewed renderings of unfamiliar shapes with 28 materials (e.g., nickel, wax, cork). In Experiment 1, they viewed nondeformed, static versions of the objects and rated 11 material attributes (e.g., soft, fragile, heavy). The results confirm that the optical materials elicited a wide range of apparent properties. In Experiment 2, using a blue plastic material with intermediate apparent softness, the objects were subjected to physical simulations of 12 shape-transforming processes (e.g., twisting, crushing, stretching). Participants rated softness and extent of deformation. Both correlated with the physical magnitude of deformation. Experiment 3 combined variations in optical cues with shape cues. We find that optical cues completely dominate. Experiment 4 included the entire motion sequence of the deformation, yielding significant contributions of optical as well as motion cues. Our findings suggest participants integrate shape, motion, and optical cues to infer stiffness, with optical cues playing a major role for our range of stimuli.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201902195428403ZK.pdf 1677KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:31次 浏览次数:15次