Reflexivity in External Religious Leaders’ Summit Communication Sequences (2005-2012) to G8 Political Leaders: The Social (Re)Construction of Cosmopolitan Responsibility by World Religious Leaders

SAGE Open

Sherrie Steiner¹ 

关键词: sociology of religion;    sociology;    social sciences;    social change;    modernization;    political theory;    politics;    humanities;    political science;    social movements;    activism;    sociology;    risk communication;    human communication;    communication studies;    communication;    political sociology;    religious studies;    humanities;    world religions;    religious studies;    international relations;   

DOI  :  10.1177/2158244013515690

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Sage Journals

【 摘 要 】

Religious governance influence in international relations is underresearched. Using reflexivity as primary governance indicator, this case study examines the external communicational sequences of the only multifaith summits (2005-2012) whose purpose is communication to, and dialogue with, G8 and G20 political leaders about global responsibilities to empirically discern, independent of religious leaders’ self-identification, whether the quality of dialogue is indicative of governance behavior or unreflexive acts of international value struggle. Reflexivity is operationalized as historically embedded in social relations using methodological cosmopolitanism. Findings indicate that religious leaders use cultural capital to blur (not reify) social boundaries that inhibit international collaboration, and offer no evidence of unreflexive dialogue. Leaders use social capital to socially (re)construct boundaries for cosmopolitan responsibility to include the interests of the vulnerable that are impacted by, but excluded from, G8 and G20 decisions. This work contributes to the “empirical mapping” of religious governance in international relations with implications for their consideration as dialogue partners for global governance.

【 授权许可】

CC BY