Comparing the results of recall surveys and standardized searches in understanding bird-window collisions at houses

Avian Conservation and Ecology

Justine A Kummer,¹  Erin M. Bayne,¹  Craig S. Machtans,² 

[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta;Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service

关键词: bird mortality;    bird-window collisions;    buildings;    citizen science;    glass;   

DOI  :  10.5751/ACE-00820-110104

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Resilience Alliance Publications

【 摘 要 】

Every year a large number of birds die when they collide with windows. The actual number is difficult to ascertain. Previous attempts to estimate bird-window collision rates in Canada relied heavily on a prior citizen-science study that used memory-based surveys. Such an approach to data collection has many potential biases. We built upon this study and its recommendations for future research by creating a citizen-science program that actively searched for collision evidence at houses and apartments for an extended period with the objective to see how standardized approaches to data collection compared with memory recall. Absolute collision estimates as well as relative differences were compared between residence types in the two studies, and we found considerable differences in absolute values for collisions but similar rankings of collision rates between residence types. Collision recall rates in our study (56.5%) were very similar those in the prior 2012 study, where 50.5% of participants remembered a bird colliding with a window at some time in the past. Fatality estimates, however, were 1.4 times higher in the 2012 study than in our study based on standardized searches. Rural houses with a bird feeder consistently had the highest number of collisions. This suggests that memory recall surveys may be a useful tool for understanding the relative importance of different risk factors causing bird-window collisions.

【 授权许可】

Others