PLoS Pathogens | |
Self-propagating, protease-resistant, recombinant prion protein conformers with or without in vivo pathogenicity | |
Romany Abskharon1  Kumar Sinniah1  Xinhe Wang1  Fei Wang1  Suzette A. Priola2  Byron Caughey3  Krystyna Surewicz3  Kayla J. Vander Stel4  Takashi Yokoyama5  Yong-Sun Kim5  Morikazu Imamura6  Jiyan Ma7  Witold K. Surewicz7  Bradley R. Groveman7  Christina D. Orrú7  | |
[1] Center for Neurodegenerative Science, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America;Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America;Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America;Ilsong Institute of Life Science, Korea CJD Diagnostic Center, Hallym University, Anyang, Republic of Korea;National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan;National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Cairo, Egypt;Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America | |
关键词: Cofactors (biochemistry); Enzyme-linked immunoassays; Prion diseases; Amyloid proteins; Immunoprecipitation; Animal prion diseases; Pathogenesis; Pathogens; | |
DOI : 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006491 | |
学科分类:生物科学(综合) | |
来源: Public Library of Science | |
【 摘 要 】
Prions, characterized by self-propagating protease-resistant prion protein (PrP) conformations, are agents causing prion disease. Recent studies generated several such self-propagating protease-resistant recombinant PrP (rPrP-res) conformers. While some cause prion disease, others fail to induce any pathology. Here we showed that although distinctly different, the pathogenic and non-pathogenic rPrP-res conformers were similarly recognized by a group of conformational antibodies against prions and shared a similar guanidine hydrochloride denaturation profile, suggesting a similar overall architecture. Interestingly, two independently generated non-pathogenic rPrP-res were almost identical, indicating that the particular rPrP-res resulted from cofactor-guided PrP misfolding, rather than stochastic PrP aggregation. Consistent with the notion that cofactors influence rPrP-res conformation, the propagation of all rPrP-res formed with phosphatidylglycerol/RNA was cofactor-dependent, which is different from rPrP-res generated with a single cofactor, phosphatidylethanolamine. Unexpectedly, despite the dramatic difference in disease-causing capability, RT-QuIC assays detected large increases in seeding activity in both pathogenic and non-pathogenic rPrP-res inoculated mice, indicating that the non-pathogenic rPrP-res is not completely inert in vivo. Together, our study supported a role of cofactors in guiding PrP misfolding, indicated that relatively small structural features determine rPrP-res’ pathogenicity, and revealed that the in vivo seeding ability of rPrP-res does not necessarily result in pathogenicity.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201902016038595ZK.pdf | 7787KB | download |