Field performance evaluation of mechanical weeders in the paddy field

Scientific Research and Essays

Mohammad Reza Alizadeh¹ 

关键词:  ;    Paddy field;    mechanical weeder;    weeding efficiency;    hand weeding.;   

DOI  :  10.5897/SRE11.1412

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Academic Journals

【 摘 要 】

The field performance of four types of mechanical rice weeders including, single row conical weeder (W1), two rows conical weeder (W2), rotary weeder (W3) and power weeder (W4) was compared to hand weeding (W5). Two transplanted local and improved rice varieties namelyHashemiandHybrid, respectively were selected for this study. The results revealed that among the mechanical weeders, the highest weeding efficiency (84.33%) was obtained with W4andHybridvariety and the lowest value (72.80%) was measured with W3andHashemivariety. The average of damaged plants in mechanical weeders was obtained as 3.83% compared to 0.13% in hand weeding. The highest effective field capacities of 0.082 and 0.087 hah-1were measured with W4and the corresponding lowest values of 0.0084 and 0.0088 hah-1were obtained with W5forHashemiandHybridvarieties, respectively. The weeding cost was reduced by 15.70, 38.51, 22.32 and 48.70% for W1, W2, W3and W4, respectively as compared to W5. The highest break-even point (1.24 hayr-1) was obtained with power weeder (W4). The average break-even point in weedres of W1, W2and W3was found to be 0.077 hayr-1. Among the tested weeders, W4showed a proper field performance.

【 授权许可】

CC BY