期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Biomedical Research
COMPARISON OF NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASUREMENT USING INDIGENOUS IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY (ICG) WITH INVASIVE FICK METHOD
Pradip Barde1 
[1] Hi Tech Medical College, Bhubaneswar India
关键词: Impedance cardiography;    Fick method;    Cardiac output;    Noninvasive;   
DOI  :  10.7439/ijbr.v3i11.854
学科分类:基础医学
来源: Scholar Science Journals
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Introduction: Cardiac output (CO) is a functional tool to evaluate the cardiovascular performance. To estimate CO, several invasive methods like the Fick method and thermodilution method are available which require catheterization of the patient. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is well-established noninvasive technique for measurement of cardiac output. The cardiac output monitor based on ICG has been indigenously designed and developed by Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai. For validatation of this indigenous equipment, we compared measurement of cardiac output using ICG with conventional Fick method. Materials and methods: We simultaneously measured cardiac output in 10 patients (mean age 40 years, range 21-54 years, 6 males and 4 females) using impedance cardiography versus that derived after utilization of Ficks principle in cardiac catheterization laboratory patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. We compared the cardiac indices obtained by two methods. Results: There is a very good correlation (r=0.9, for n=10) between the cardiac index obtained by impedance cardiography and that derived invasively after cardiac catheterization using the Fick method. The mean values of cardiac indices by ICG method and the Fick method were 3.80.6 l/min/m2 and 2.90.5 l/min/m2 respectively. The average bias from the ICG to Fick is 0.8 l/min/m2 whereas individual variability is 0.3 l/min/m2. Conclusion: These results support use of this indigenous ICG equipment in patient care for monitoring cardiac output measurement with the further validation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201902011164195ZK.pdf 180KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次