期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Psychology
Arbitrary numbers counter fair decisions: trails of markedness in card distribution
Philipp A. Schroeder1 
关键词: embodied cognition;    numerical cognition;    SNARC effect;    MARC effect;    and justice for all;    linguistic markedness;    free choice;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00240
学科分类:心理学(综合)
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Converging evidence from controlled experiments suggests that the mere processing of a number and its attributes such as value or parity might affect free choice decisions between different actions. For example the spatial numerical associations of response codes (SNARC) effect indicates the magnitude of a digit to be associated with a spatial representation and might therefore affect spatial response choices (i.e., decisions between a “left” and a “right” option). At the same time, other (linguistic) features of a number such as parity are embedded into space and might likewise prime left or right responses through feature words [odd or even, respectively; markedness association of response codes (MARC) effect]. In this experiment we aimed at documenting such influences in a natural setting. We therefore assessed number-space and parity-space association effects by exposing participants to a fair distribution task in a card playing scenario. Participants drew cards, read out loud their number values, and announced their response choice, i.e., dealing it to a left vs. right player, indicated by Playmobil characters. Not only did participants prefer to deal more cards to the right player, the card’s digits also affected response choices and led to a slightly but systematically unfair distribution, supported by a regular SNARC effect and counteracted by a reversed MARC effect. The experiment demonstrates the impact of SNARC- and MARC-like biases in free choice behavior through verbal and visual numerical information processing even in a setting with high external validity.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201901226364346ZK.pdf 1390KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:11次