| Frontiers in Psychology | |
| Commentary: Can Inner Experience Be Apprehended in High Fidelity? Examining Brain Activation and Experience from Multiple Perspectives | |
| Henry D. Schlinger1  | |
| 关键词: pristine inner experience; introspection; consciousness; behavior; behavior analysis; | |
| DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00360 | |
| 学科分类:心理学(综合) | |
| 来源: Frontiers | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Hurlburt et al. (2017) argue that they can potentially produce high-fidelity apprehensions of pristine inner experience that are radically non-subjective. In so doing, they claim that inner experience is an important topic and, contrary to almost unanimous scientific consensus, a method of introspection may be reliably used to directly apprehend it. In this and related articles (e.g., Hurlburt and Heavey, 2001; Heavy and Hurlburt, 2008), Hurlburt et al. reverse a general trend in psychology over the past 100 years toward studying behavior and away from studying subjective experience. In this commentary, I offer a logical and explicitly behavioristic (i.e., Skinnerian) critique of some of Hurlburt et al.'s points.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201901223997891ZK.pdf | 177KB |
PDF