СУТЬ И СПОСОБЫ ПРИНУЖДЕНИЯ В КАТЕГОРИЯХ ФИЗИКИ (УГОЛОВНО-ПРАВОВОЙ АСПЕКТ)

Pravoprimenenie

Михаил Семенович Гринберг¹ 

[1] Омский государственный университет им.Ф.М. Достоевского, г. Омск, Россия

关键词: Принуждение;    ответственность;    вина;    ответственность без вины;    донос;    уголовное право;   

DOI  :  10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(2).10-13

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Dostoevsky Omsk State University

【 摘 要 】

The Subject. The article is devoted to impact of coercion to the difference of legal statuses between law-obedient individuals and abusers. The purpose of the article is to identify the difference between the impact of coercion on law-obedient citizens and abusers. Methodology. The author uses theoretical analysis as well as legal methods including formal legal analysis and the method of social modeling. Results, scope of application. It is proved that a certain difference (in the categories of phys-ics) should exist between the legal status of law-obedient individuals and abusers there is a certain difference. Where there is no such difference, there is no place for coercion. Conclusions. The author comes to the conclusion that the essence of any punishment is the deprivation of certain benefits, which means the difference between the status of a person who did not conflict with the criminal law and those who entered into such a conflict. The magnitude of the difference depends on the severity of the crime.

【 授权许可】

CC BY