Enhancement of Return Routability Mechanism for Optimized-NEMO Using Correspondent Firewall

ETRI Journal

关键词: route optimization;    firewall;    Return Routability Procedure;    Network Mobility;   

Others  :  1196783
DOI  :  10.4218/etrij.13.0111.0804

【 摘 要 】

Network Mobility (NEMO) handles mobility of multiple nodes in an aggregate manner as a mobile network. The standard NEMO suffers from a number of limitations, such as inefficient routing and increased handoff latency. Most previous studies attempting to solve such problems have imposed an extra signaling load and/or modified the functionalities of the main entities. In this paper, we propose a more secure and lightweight route optimization (RO) mechanism based on exploiting the firewall in performing the RO services on behalf of the correspondent nodes (CNs). The proposed mechanism provides secure communications by making an authorized decision about the mobile router (MR) home of address, MR care of address, and the complete mobile network prefixes underneath the MR. In addition, it reduces the total signaling required for NEMO handoffs, especially when the number of mobile network nodesand/or CNs is increased. Moreover, our proposed mechanism can be easily deployed without modifying the mobility protocol stack of CNs. A thorough analytical model and network simulator (Ns-2) are used for evaluating the performance of the proposed mechanism compared with NEMO basic support protocol and state-of-the-art RO schemes. Numerical and simulation results demonstrate that our proposed mechanism outperforms other RO schemes in terms of handoff latency and total signaling load on wired and wireless links.

   

【 参考文献 】

• [1]C. Perkins, "IP Mobility Support for IPv4," RFC 3220, Jan. 2002.
• [2]D. Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6," RFC 3775, June 2004.
• [3]S.S. Hassan and R. Hassan, "IPv6 Network Mobility Route Optimization Survey," Am. J. Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 6, 2011, pp. 579-583.
• [4]V. Devarapalli et al., "Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol," RFC 3963, Jan. 2005.
• [5]T. Ernst and H.Y. Lach, "RFC 4885: Network Mobility Support Terminology," IETF, 2007. http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4885.pdf
• [6]M.C. Chuang and J.F. Lee, "DRO: Domain-Based Route Optimization Scheme for Nested Mobile Networks," EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., vol. 2011, no. 70, 2011, pp. 1-19.
• [7]F.Z. Yousaf and C. Wietfeld, "Solving Pinball Routing, Race Condition and Loop Formation Issues in Nested Mobile Networks," Computer Netw., vol. 56, no. 4, Mar. 2012, pp. 1357-1375.
• [8]M. Calderón et al., "Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Route Optimization Solution for NEMO," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 9, 2006, pp. 1702-1716.
• [9]A. Shahriar, Md. S. Hossain, and M. Atiquzzaman, "A Cost Analysis Framework for NEMO Prefix Delegation-Based Schemes," IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 11, no. 7, 2012, pp. 1192-1206.
• [10]C.J. Bernardos et al., "VARON: Vehicular Ad hoc Route Optimization for NEMO," Computer Commun., vol. 30, no. 8, June 2007, pp. 1765-1784.
• [11]S. Krishnan, Y. Sheffer, and N. Steinleitner, "Guidelines for Firewall Vendors Regarding MIPv6 Traffic," IETF, Internet-Draft, Mar. 14, 2011.
• [12]S. Bellovin and W. Cheswick, "Network Firewalls," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 32, no. 9, Sept. 1994, pp. 50-57.
• [13]W. Stallings, Network Security Essentials: Applications and Standards, 4th ed., Pearson Education Asia, 2003. DOI: 10.1109/MNET.2000.826358.
• [14]P.J. Li and C.S. Zhi, "A Mobile IPv6 Firewall Traversal Scheme Integrating with AAA," IEEE, WiCOM, Sept. 2006, pp. 1-6.
• [15]F. Le, S. Faccin, and B. Patil, "Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement," RFC 4487, May 2006.
• [16]X. Cui, A. Makela, and P. McCann, Eds., "Proxy Correspondent Node Operation for Mobile IPv6 Route Optimization," IETF, Internet-Draft, July 4, 2011.
• [17]C.Ng, J. Hirano, "Extending Return Routability Procedure for Network Prefix (RRNP)," IETF, Internet-Draft, Oct. 2004.
• [18]C. Perkins, D. Johnson, and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6," IETF, Internet-Draft, Mar. 11, 2011.
• [19]J. McNair, I.F. Akyildiz, and M. Bender, "Handoffs for Real-Time Traffic in Mobile IP Version 6 Networks," Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 6, Nov. 2001, pp. 3463-3467.
• [20]K. Wang and J. Huey, "A Cost Effective Distributed Location Management Strategy for Wireless Networks," Wireless Netw., vol. 5, no. 4, 1999, pp. 287 -297.
• [21]C. Makaya and S. Pierre, "An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based Mobility Management Protocols," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 3, Mar. 2008, pp. 972-983.
• [22]J. McNair, I.F. Akyildiz, and M. Bender, "An Inter-System Handoff Technique for IMT-2000 System," Proc. INFOCOMM, Mar. 2000, pp. 208-216.
• [23]J. Xie and I.F. Akyildiz, "A Novel Distributed Dynamic Location Management Scheme for Minimizing Signaling Costs in Mobile IP," IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, July-Sept. 2002, pp. 163-175.
• [24]W.K. Lai and J.C. Chiu, "Improving Handoff Performance in Wireless Overlay Networks by Switching Between Two-Layer IPv6 and One-Layer IPv6 Addressing," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, Nov. 2005, pp. 2129-2137.
• [25]C. Makaya and S. Pierre, "An Architecture for Seamless Mobility Support in IP-Based Next-Generation Wireless Networks," IEEE Trans, Veh. Technol., vol. 57, no. 2, Mar. 2008, pp. 1209-1225.
• [26]MobiWan: Ns-2 Extensions to Study Mobility in Wide-Area IPv6 Networks, 2002. Available: http://www.inrialpes.fr/planete/mobiwan/