Adjustments of the TaD electron density reconstruction model with GNSS-TEC parameters for operational application purposes

Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate

Ioanna Tsagouri¹  Anna Belehaki¹  Stefka Fidanova³  Pencho Marinov³  Ivan Kutiev² 

[1] Institute of Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National Observatory of Athens,15236 Palaia Penteli,Greece;National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy, and Geography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,1113 Sofia,Bulgaria;Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,1113 Sofia,Bulgaria

关键词: satellites;    modelling;    total electron content;    plasmasphere;    ionosphere (mid latitude);   

Others  :  800704
DOI  :  doi:10.1051/swsc/2012021

【 摘 要 】

Validation results on the latest version of TaD model (TaDv2) show realistic reconstruction of the electron density profiles (EDPs) with an average error of 3 TECU, similar to the error obtained from GNSS-TEC calculated paremeters. The work presented here has the aim to further improve the accuracy of the TaD topside reconstruction, adjusting the TEC parameter calculated from TaD model with the TEC parameter calculated by GNSS transmitting RINEX files provided by receivers co-located with the Digisondes. The performance of the new version is tested during a storm period demonstrating further improvements in respect to the previous version. Statistical comparison of modeled and observed TEC confirms the validity of the proposed adjustment. A significant benefit of the proposed upgrade is that it facilitates the real-time implementation of TaD. The model needs a reliable measure of the scale height at the peak height, which is supposed to be provided by Digisondes. Oftenly, the automatic scaling software fails to correctly calculate the scale height at the peak, Hm, due to interferences in the receiving signal. Consequently the model estimated topside scale height is wrongly calculated leading to unrealistic results for the modeled EDP. The proposed TEC adjustment forces the model to correctly reproduce the topside scale height, despite the inaccurate values of Hm. This adjustment is very important for the application of TaD in an operational environment.

【 授权许可】

   
© I. Kutiev et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2012

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Belehaki, A., N. Jakowski, and B.W. Reinisch, Comparison of ionospheric ionization measurements over Athens using ground ionosonde and GNSS derived TEC values, Radio Sci., 38 (6), 1105–1114, DOI: 10.1019/2003RS00286, 2003.
• [2]Belehaki, A., Lj. Cander, B. Zolesi, J. Bremer, C. Juren, I. Stanislawska, D. Dialetis, and M. Hatzopoulos, DIAS Project: the establishment of a European digital upper atmosphere server, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 67, 1092–1099, 2005.
• [3]Belehaki, A., Lj. Cander, B. Zolesi, J. Bremer, C. Juren, I. Stanislawska, D. Dialetis, and M. Hatzopoulos, Monitoring and forecasting the ionosphere over Europe: the DIAS project, Space Weather, 4, S12002, DOI: 10.1029/2006SW000270, 2006a.
• [4]Belehaki, A., P. Marinov, I. Kutiev, N. Jakowski, and S. Stankov, Comparison of the topside ionosphere scale height determined by topside sounders model and bottomside Digisonde profiles, Adv. Space Res., 37, 963–966, 2006b.
• [5]Belehaki, A., Lj. Cander, B. Zolesi, J. Bremer, C. Juren, I. Stanislawska, D. Dialetis, and M. Hatzopoulos, Ionospheric specification and forecasting based on observations from European ionosondes participating in DIAS project, Acta Geophys., 55 (3), 398–409, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-007-0010-x, 2007. [NASA ADS]
• [6]Belehaki, A., I. Kutiev, B. Reinisch, N. Jakowski, P. Marinov, I. Galkin, C. Mayer, I. Tsagouri, and T. Herekakis, Verification of the TSMP-assisted Digisonde (TaD) topside profiling technique, Acta Geophys., 58 (3), 432–452, 2009.
• [7]Belehaki, A., I. Tsagouri, I. Kutiev, P. Marinov, and S. Fidanova, Upgrades to the Topside Sounders Model assisted by Digisonde (TaD) and its validation at the topside ionosphere, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2, A20, 2012.
• [8]Kutiev, I., P. Marinov, and S. Watanabe, Model of the topside ionosphere scale height based on topside sounder data, Adv. Space Res., 37 (5), 943–950, 2006.
• [9]Kutiev, I., and P. Marinov, Topside sounder model of scale height and transition height characteristics of the ionosphere, Adv. Space Res., 39, 759–766, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2006.06.013, 2007.
• [10]Kutiev, I., P. Marinov, A. Belehaki, B. Reinisch, and N. Jakowski, Reconstruction of topside density profile by using the topside sounder model profiler and Digisonde data, Adv. Space Res., 43, 1683–1687, 2009a.
• [11]Kutiev, I., P. Marinov, A. Belehaki, N. Jakowski, B. Reinisch, C. Mayer, and I. Tsagouri, Plasmaspheric electron density reconstruction based on the topside sounder model profiler, Acta Geophys., 58 (3), 420–431, 2009b.
• [12]Marinov, P., I. Kutiev, and S. Watanabe, Empirical model of O+-H+ transition height based on topside sounder data, Adv. Space Res., 34, 2015–2022, 2004.
• [13]Podladchikova, T., and R. Van der Linden, An upper limit prediction of the peak sunspot number for solar cycle 24, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 1, A01, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2011110013, 2011.
• [14]Reinisch, B.W., and X. Huang, Deducing topside profiles and total electron content from bottomside ionograms, 27 (1), 23–30, 2001.
• [15]Tsagouri, I., Evaluation of the performance of DIAS ionospheric forecasting models, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 1, A02, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2011110003, 2011.