期刊论文详细信息
GMS German Medical Science — an Interdisciplinary Journal
The state-of-the-art of emergency contraception with the cutting edge drugStand der Wissenschaft und Technik bei der Notfall-Kontrazeption mit innovativen Arzneimitteln
Narendra Nath Sarkar1 
[1] Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Dellhi, India
关键词: antagonists;    agonists;    EC;    ulipristal acetate;    steroid ligands;    receptor modulator;   
Others  :  869205
实施日期:2011-04-08,发布日期:2011-07-11
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The objective of this study is to evaluate and elucidated the potential of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) to be an effective emergency contraception (EC). The data are extracted from the literature through the MEDLINE database service from 2000–2010.

The SPRMs are in fact progesterone receptor ligands that could bind to progesterone receptor (PR) and exert antagonistic, agonistic or mixed agonist-antagonistic effects. These SPRMs are mifepristone, onapristone, asoprisnil, ulipristal, proellex among other compounds.

Currently developed SPRMs may exert contraceptive effects by inhibiting ovulation and retarding endometrial synchronization. Low-doses of progesterone antagonists retard endometrial maturation without affecting ovulation. Mifepristone being a SPRM is effective for prevention of pregnancy but with prostaglandin acts as an excellent abortifacient; yet could not compete with levonorgestrel as EC. However, a single dose of 30 mg ulipristal acetate, another SPRM with similar effectiveness and side effect profiles as 1.5 mg levonorgestrel EC, has shown wider ‘window of effect’ by inhibition of the LH peak even if administered at the advanced pre-ovulatory phase, a time when use of levonorgestrel EC is no longer effective. Thus, ulipristal acetate goes one-step ahead of levonorgestrel in the field of emergency contraception treatment.

Further studies are needed to explore the potential of other SPRMs to be cutting edge emergency contraceptive drugs.

【 授权许可】

   
© 2011 Sarkar.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140729195105992.pdf 182KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Benagiano G, Bastianelli C, Farris M. Hormonal contraception: state of the art and future perspectives. Minerva Ginecol. 2007;59(3):241-70.
  • [2]Sitruk-Ware R, Brache V, Maguire R, Croxatto H, Kumar N, Kumar S, Montero JC, Salvatierra AM, Phillips D, Faundes A. Pharmacokinetic study to compare the absorption and tolerability of two doses of levonorgestrel following single vaginal administration of levonorgestrel in Carraguard gel: a new formulation for "dual protection" contraception. Contraception. 2007;75(6):454-60. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.02.003 
  • [3]Wu S, Dong J, Cong J, Wang C, VonHertzen H, Godfrey EM. Gestrinone compared with mifepristone for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(4):740-4. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d43ae4 
  • [4]Esteve JL, García R, Breto A, Llorente M. Emergency contraception in Cuba with 10 mg of mifepristone. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007;12(2):162-7. DOI: 10.1080/13625180701330480 
  • [5]Taneepanichskul S. Emergency contraception with mifepristone 10 mg in Thai women. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(8):999-1002.
  • [6]Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, Logan SJ, Casale W, Van Horn J, Sogor L, Blithe DL, Scherrer B, Mathe H, Jaspart A, Ulmann A, Gainer E. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):555-62. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60101-8 
  • [7]Ngai SW, Fan S, Li S, Cheng L, Ding J, Jing X, Ng EH, Ho PC. A randomized trial to compare 24 h versus 12 h double dose regimen of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(1):307-11. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh583 
  • [8]Hansen LB, Saseen JJ, Teal SB. Levonorgestrel-only dosing strategies for emergency contraception. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;(2):278-84. DOI: 10.1592/phco.27.2.278 
  • [9]Ouzounian S, Bouchard P, Chabbert-Buffet N. Effects of antiprogestins on the uterus. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2008;4(3):269-80. DOI: 10.2217/17455057.4.3.269 
  • [10]Pintiaux A, Chabbert-Buffet N, Foidart JM. Gynaecological uses of a new class of steroids: the selective progesterone receptor modulators. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25(2):67-73. DOI: 10.1080/09513590802531120 
  • [11]Benagiano G, Bastianelli C, Farris M. Selective progesterone receptor modulators 2: use in reproductive medicine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9(14):2473-85. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.9.14.2473 
  • [12]Chabbert-Buffet N, Ouzounian S, Kairis AP, Bouchard P. Contraceptive applications of progesterone receptor modulators. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(3):222-30. DOI: 10.1080/13625180802267060 
  • [13]Sarkar NN. Mifepristone: bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and use-effectiveness. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101(2):113-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00522-X 
  • [14]Psychoyos A, Nikas G, Sarantis L, Gravanis A. Hormonal anti-implantation agents: antiprogestins. Hum Reprod. 1995;10 Suppl 2:140-50
  • [15]Swahn ML, Danielsson KG, Bygdeman M. Contraception with anti-progesterone. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;10(1):43-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80061-7 
  • [16]Dockery P, Ismail RM, Li TC, Warren MA, Cooke ID. The effect of a single dose of mifepristone (RU486) on the fine structure of the human endometrium during the early luteal phase. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(8):1778-84. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1778 
  • [17]Murphy AA, Kettel LM, Morales AJ, Roberts V, Parmley T, Yen SS. Endometrial effects of long-term low-dose administration of RU486. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(4):761-6.
  • [18]Cameron ST, Critchley HO, Thong KJ, Buckley CH, Williams AR, Baird DT. Effects of daily low dose mifepristone on endometrial maturation and proliferation. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(11):2518-26.
  • [19]Spitz IM, Van Look PF, Coelingh Bennink HJ. The use of progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators in contraception. Steroids. 2000;65(10-11):817-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00199-9 
  • [20]Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised trial. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Lancet. 1999;353(9154):697-702. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07190-6 
  • [21]Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, Spitz IM. Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(3):293-307. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmi002 
  • [22]Ioffe OB, Zaino RJ, Mutter GL. Endometrial changes from short-term therapy with CDB-4124, a selective progesterone receptor modulator. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(3):450-9. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.204 
  • [23]Gainer EE, Ulmann A. Pharmacologic properties of CDB(VA)-2914. Steroids. 2003;68(10-13):1005-11. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-128X(03)00130-2 
  • [24]Cheng L, Gülmezoglu AM, Piaggio G, Ezcurra E, Van Look PF. Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD001324.
  • [25]von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Ding J, Chen J, Song S, Bártfai G, Ng E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Oyunbileg A, Wu S, Cheng W, Lüdicke F, Pretnar-Darovec A, Kirkman R, Mittal S, Khomassuridze A, Apter D, Peregoudov A; WHO Research Group on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9348):1803-10. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11767-3 
  • [26]Creinin MD, Schlaff W, Archer DF, Wan L, Frezieres R, Thomas M, Rosenberg M, Higgins J. Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1089-97. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239440.02284.45 
  • [27]Fine P, Mathé H, Ginde S, Cullins V, Morfesis J, Gainer E. Ulipristal acetate taken 48-120 hours after intercourse for emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(2 Pt 1):257-63. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c8e2aa 
  • [28]Croxatto HB, Brache V, Pavez M, Cochon L, Forcelledo ML, Alvarez F, Massai R, Faundes A, Salvatierra AM. Pituitary-ovarian function following the standard levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive dose or a single 0.75-mg dose given on the days preceding ovulation. Contraception. 2004;70(6):442-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.05.007 
  • [29]Brache V, Cochon L, Jesam C, Maldonado R, Salvatierra AM, Levy DP, Gainer E, Croxatto HB. Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2256-63. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq157 
  • [30]Gemzell-Danielsson K, Meng CX. Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:53-61. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S5865 
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:10次