A Study on the Identification of Cutting-Edge ICT-Based Converging Technologies

ETRI Journal

关键词: converging coefficient;    technology classification;    selection;    patent analysis;    Converging technologies;   

Others  :  1186346
DOI  :  10.4218/etrij.12.0111.0681

【 摘 要 】

It is becoming increasingly difficult to identify promising technologies due to the influx of new technologies and the high level of complexity involved in many of these technologies. Identifying promising information and communications technology (ICT)-based converging technologies holds the key to finding new sources of economic growth and forward momentum. The goal of this study is to identify cutting-edge ICT-based converging technologies by examining the latest trends in the US patent market. Analyzing the US patent market, the most competitive of such markets in the world, can yield certain clues about which of the ICT-based converging technologies may be the next revolutionary technologies. For a classification of these technologies, this study follows the International Patent Classification system. As for ICT, there are 58 related fields at the subclass level and 831 fields at the main-group level. For emerging and converging technologies, there are 75 at the main-group level. From these technologies, a final selection for cutting-edge ICT-based converging technologies is made using a composite index reflecting the converging coefficient, emerging coefficient, and technology impact index.

   

【 参考文献 】

• [1]W. Xing, X. Ye, and L. Kui, “Measuring Convergence of China’s ICT Industry: An Input-Output Analysis,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 35, no. 4, 2011, pp. 301-313.
• [2]H. Lee, “Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Broadcasting and Telecommunications Convergence Technology,” ETRI J., vol. 32, no. 2, Apr. 2010, p. 183.
• [3]J.F. Terapane, “A Unique Source of Information,” Chemtech, vol. 8, 1978, pp. 272-276.
• [4]USPTO, “Technology Assessment Forecast,” Information Retrieval in Chemistry and Chemical Patent Law, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1983.
• [5]F. Hacklin, C. Marxt, and F. Fahrni, “An Evolutionary Perspective on Convergence: Inducing a Stage Model of Inter-industry Innovation,” Int. J. Technol. Manag., vol. 49, no. 1-3, 2010, pp. 220-249.
• [6]C. Bores, C. Saurina, and R. Torres, “Technological Convergence: A Strategic Perspective,” Technovation, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 1-13.
• [7]T. Daim et al., “Forecasting Emerging Technologies: Use of Bibliometrics and Patent Analysis,” Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, vol. 73, no. 8, 2006, pp. 981-1012.
• [8]M.P. Carpenter, F. Narin, and P. Woolf, “Citation Rates to Technologically Important Patents,” World Patent Inf., vol. 3, no. 4, 1981, pp. 160-163.
• [9]M.B. Albert et al., “Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents,” Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 3, 1991, pp. 251-259.
• [10]D. Harhoff et al., “Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovations,” Review Economics Statistics, vol. 81, no. 3, 1999, pp. 511-515.
• [11]S.P. Lee, “Discovering Promising Technologies through Information Analysis,” Seminar Technologies Tomorrow, 2008, pp. 93-109 (in Korean).
• [12]N. Corrocher, F. Malerba, and F. Montobbio, “The Emergence of New Technologies in the ICT Field: Main Actors, Geographical Distribution and Knowledge Sources,” Economics Quantitative Methods, vol. 37, 2003, pp. 1-30.
• [13]B.Y. Ko and H.S. Rho, “Discovery of Promising Business Items by Technology-Industry Concordance and Keyword Co-occurrence Analysis of US Patents” J. Korean Technol. Innovation Soc., vol. 8, no. 2, 2005, pp. 860-885 (in Korean).
• [14]D. Harhoff, F.M. Scherer, and K. Vogel, “Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights,” Research Policy, vol. 32, no. 8, 2003, pp. 1343-1363.
• [15]H.J. Kang, Predicting Promising Converging Technologies through Patent Analysis, PhD dissertation presented at Kookmin University, Rep. of Korea, 2006 (in Korean).
• [16]H.J. Kang, M.J. Eom, and D.M. Kim, “Predicting Promising Converging Technologies through Patent Analysis,” J. Korean Technol. Innovation Soc., vol. 14, no. 3, 2006, pp. 93-116 (in Korean).
• [17]Y.H. Bae et al., Portfolio Analysis for Development of a National R&D Investment Strategy, Korea Development Institute, Rep. of Korea, 2007, pp. 31-35 (in Korean).
• [18]U. Schmoch et al., “Linking Technology Areas to Industry Sectors,” Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research, 2003.
• [19]W.Y. Lee et al., Analysis of Technology-Industry Concordance Using Patent Databases and Evaluation of Patent Strategies of Korean Firms, Korea Development Institute, Rep. Of Korea, 2004 (in Korean).
• [20]H.J. Seoh, Analysis of Determinants of Technology Innovation Activities and Technology Spillover Using Company Patent Application Data, Korea Development Institute, Rep. of Korea, 2005 (in Korean).
• [21]P.R. Kim and S.H. Hwang, “A Study on the Projection of the IT-Based Promising Technologies Utilizing Patent Database,” J. Korea Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 34, no. 10, 2009, pp. 1021-1030 (in Korean).
• [22]N. Rosenberg, “Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910,” J. Econ. Hist., vol. 23, no. 4, 1963, pp. 414-443.
• [23]F. Kodama, “Inter-disciplinary Research: Japanese Innovation in Mechatronics Technology,” Sci. Public Policy, vol. 13, no. 1, 1986, pp. 44-51.
• [24]F. Hacklin, C. Marxt, and F. Fahrni, “Coevolutionary Cycles of Convergence: An Extrapolaration from the ICT Industry,” Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, vol. 76, no. 6, July 2009, pp. 723-736.
• [25]C.S. Curran and J. Leker, “Patent Indicators for Monitoring Convergence–Examples from NFF and ICT,” Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, vol. 78, no. 2, 2011, pp. 256-273.
• [26]P.E. Bierly and A.K. Chakrabarti, “Dynamic Knowledge Strategies and Industry Fusion, Int. J. Manufacturing Technol. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1/2, 2001, pp. 31-48.
• [27]P.E. Bierly and A.K. Chakrabarti, “Managing through Industry Fusion,” in The Dynamics of Innovation: Strategic and Managerial Implications, K. Brockhoff, A.K. Chakrabarti, and J. Hauschildt, Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1999, pp. 7-26.
• [28]F. Kodama, “Technology Fusion and the New R&D,” Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 70, no. 4, 1992, pp. 70-78.
• [29]J. Kim, “Will Technology Fusion Induce the Paradigm Change of University Education?” Int. J. Technol. Management, vol. 38, no. 3, 2007, pp. 220-234.
• [30]M. Fujimoto, K. Miyazaki and N. von. Tunzelmann, “Technological Fusion and Telemedicine in Japanese Companies,” Technovation, vol. 20, no. 4, 2000, pp. 169-187.
• [31]J.M. Pennings and P. Puranam, “Market Convergence & Firm Strategy: New Directions for Theory and Research,” ECIS Conference: Future Innovation Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2001.
• [32]G. Duysters and J. Hagedoorn, “Technological Convergence in the IT Industry: The Role of Strategic Technology Alliances and Technological Competencies,” Int. J. Econ. Bus., vol. 5, no. 3, 1998, pp. 355-368.
• [33]H.J. No and Y.T. Park, “Trajectory Patterns of Technology Fusion: Trend Analysis and Taxonomical Grouping in Nanobiotechnology,” Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, vol. 77, 2010, pp. 63-75.
• [34]Y. Geum et al., “Technological Convergence of IT and BT: Evidence from Patent Analysis,” ETRI J., vol. 34, no. 3, June 2012, pp. 439-449.
• [35]Ministry of Education and Human Resources et al., Korean Converging Technology Development Master Plan, 2007.
• [36]A. Davies, “Innovation in Large Technical Systems: The Case of Telecommunications,” Industrial Corporate Change, vol. 5, no. 4, 1996, pp. 1143-1180.