Scalable Quasi-Dynamic-Provisioning-Based Admission Control Mechanismin Differentiated Service Networks

ETRI Journal

关键词: DiffServ;    movable boundary;    measurement-based admission control (MBAC);    bandwidth broker;    Dynamic provisioning;   

Others  :  1185179
DOI  :  10.4218/etrij.04.0102.0003

【 摘 要 】

The architecture in a differentiated services (DiffServ)network is based on a simple model that applies a per-classservice in the core node of the network. However, becausethe network behavior is simple, the network structure andprovisioning is complicated. If a service provider wantsdynamic provisioning or a better bandwidth guarantee, thedifferentiated services network must use a signalingprotocol with QoS parameters or an admission controlmethod. Unfortunately, these methods increase thecomplexity. To overcome the problems with complexity, weinvestigated scalable dynamic provisioning for admissioncontrol in DiffServ networks. We propose a new scalableqDPM2 mechanism based on a centralized bandwidthbroker and distributed measurement-based admissioncontrol and movable boundary bandwidth management tosupport heterogeneous QoS requirements in DiffServnetworks.

   

【 参考文献 】

• [1]L. Mathy, C. Edwards, and D. Hutchison, "The Internet: A Global Telecommunications Solution?" IEEE Network Magazine, July/Aug. 2000, pp. 46-57.
• [2]R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview, IETF RFC 1633, June 1994.
• [3]S. Blake et al., An Architecture for Differentiated Services, IETF RFC 2475, Dec. 1998.
• [4]L. Zhang et al., "RSVP: A New Resource Reservation Protocol," IEEE Network Magazine, vol. 7, no. 5, Sept. 1993, pp. 8-18.
• [5]X. Xiao and L.M. Ni, "Internet Qos: A Big Picture," IEEE Network Magazine, Mar/Apr. 1999, pp. 8-18.
• [6]L. Breslau, S. Jamin, and S. Shenker, "Measurement-Based Admission Control: What is the Research Agenda?" IEEE IWQoS’99, 1999, pp. 3-5.
• [7]S. Jamin, S.J. Shenker, and P.B. Danzig, "Comparison of Measurement-Based Admission Control Algorithms for Controlled-Load Service," IEEE INFOCOM’97, 1997, pp. 973-980.
• [8]S. Floyd, Comments on Measurement-Based Admissions Control for Controlled-Load Services, Technical Report, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, July 1996.
• [9]G. Bianchi, A. Capone, and C. Petrioli, "Throughput Analysis of End-to-End Measurement-Based Admission Control in IP," IEEE INFOCOM 2000, 2000, pp. 1461-1470.
• [10]V. Elek, G. Karlsson, and R. Ronngren, "Admission Control Based on End-to-End Measurements," IEEE INFOCOM 2000, 2000, pp. 1471-1480.
• [11]D. Sreekantan et al., Implementation of a Bandwidth Broker System for Resource Management in Differentiated Services, http://www.ittc.ukans.edu/~kdrao/845, 1999.
• [12]Differentiation Service Implementation, http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~ kdrao/bb, 2000.
• [13]R.R.-F. Liao and A.T. Campbell, "Dynamic Core Provisioning for Quantitative Differentiated Service," IEEE IWQoS2001, May 2001.
• [14]R.R.-F. Liao and A.T. Campbell, "Dynamic Edge Provisioning for Core IP Networks," IEEE IWQoS2000, May 2000, pp. 148-156.
• [15]Z.-L. Zhang et al., "Decoupling QoS Control from Core Routers: A Novel Bandwidth Broker Architecture for Scalable Support of Guaranteed Services," ACM SIGCOMM 2000, 2000, pp. 71-83.
• [16]Z.-L. Zhang et al., "On Scalable Design of Bandwidth Brokers," IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. e84-b, no. 8, Aug. 2001, pp. 2011-2025.
• [17]Y.T. Hou et al., "Providing Scalable Support for Multiple QoS Guarantees: Architecture and Mechanisms," IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. e84-b, no. 10, Oct. 2001, pp. 2830-2849.
• [18]W.S. Rhee et al., "Two Phase Edge-to-Edge Distributed Measurement Based Admission Control Mechanism in Large IP Networks," IEEE GLOBECOM 2001, Nov. 2001, pp. 2571-2575.
• [19]W.S. Rhee et al., "Dynamic Provisioning Mechanism for Heterogeneous QoS Guarantee in Differentiated Service Network," IEEE ICC 2003, Anchorage, May 2003.