Optimization of the examination posture in spinal curvature assessment

Scoliosis

Jiri Salinger²  Petr Stepanik²  Jiri Gallo¹  Jakub Krejci² 

[1] Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic;Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

关键词: Approximation polynomial;    DTP-3 system;    Non-invasive assessment;    Postural sway;    Examination posture;    Spinal deformity;   

Others  :  791595
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-7161-7-10

 received in 2011-12-07, accepted in 2012-02-07,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

To decrease the influence of postural sway during spinal measurements, an instrumented fixation posture (called G) was proposed and tested in comparison with the free standing posture (A) using the DTP-3 system in a group of 70 healthy volunteers. The measurement was performed 5 times on each subject and each position was tested by a newly developed device for non-invasive spinal measurements called DTP-3 system. Changes in postural stability of the spinous processes for each subject/the whole group were evaluated by employing standard statistical tools. Posture G, when compared to posture A, reduced postural sway significantly in all spinous processes from C3 to L5 in both the mediolateral and anterioposterior directions. Posture G also significantly reduced postural sway in the vertical direction in 18 out of 22 spinous processes. Importantly, posture G did not significantly influence the spinal curvature.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Krejci et al; BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 10.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE: Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25(16):2052-2063.
• [2]Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS, Stovall M, Lonstein JE, Doody MM: Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res 2010, 174(1):83-90.
• [3]D’Osualdo F, Schierano S, Soldano FM, Isola M: New tridimensional approach to the evaluation of the spine through surface measurement: the BACES system. J Med Eng Technol 2002, 26(3):95-105.
• [4]Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D: A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur Spine J 2004, 13(2):122-136.
• [5]Ovadia D, Bar-On E, Fragniere B, Rigo M, Dickman D, Leitner J, Wientroub S, Dubousset J: Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study. Eur Spine J 2007, 16(1):97-105.
• [6]Shannon TM: Development of an apparatus to evaluate Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis by dynamic surface topography. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 140:121-127.
• [7]Weiss HR, Elobeidi N: Comparison of the kyphosis angle evaluated by video rasterstereography (VRS) with x-ray measurements. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 140:137-139.
• [8]Patias P, Grivas TB, Kaspiris A, Aggouris C, Drakoutos E: A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices. Scoliosis 2010, 5:12. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Nault ML, Allard P, Hinse S, Le Blanc R, Caron O, Labelle H, Sadeghi H: Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002, 27(17):1911-1917.
• [10]Beaulieu M, Toulotte C, Gatto L, Rivard CH, Teasdale N, Simoneau M, Allard P: Postural imbalance in non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at different periods of progression. Eur Spine J 2009, 18(1):38-44.
• [11]Schumann K, Puschel I, Maier-Hennes A, Weiss HR: Postural changes in patients with scoliosis in different postural positions revealed by surface topography. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 140:140-143.
• [12]Knott P, Mardjetko S, Dunn M, Johnson D, Cruze S, Moore J: Evaluating the influence of patient positioning on the accuracy of Ortelius 800 measurements for scoliosis. Scoliosis 2009, 4(Suppl 1):O18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Kuo FC, Hong CZ, Lai CL, Tan SH: Postural control strategies related to anticipatory perturbation and quick perturbation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011, 36(10):810-816.
• [14]Gram MC, Hasan Z: The spinal curve in standing and sitting postures in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999, 24(2):169-177.
• [15]Krejci J, Salinger J, Gallo J, Kolisko P, Stepanik P: Influence of selected examination postures on shape of the spine and postural stability in humans. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2008, 152(2):275-281.
• [16]Torell G, Nachemson A, Haderspeck-Grib K, Schultz A: Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985, 10(5):425-427.
• [17]Phiri PDC, Krejčí J, Salinger J: Assessment of the influence of examination postures on postural stability by means of the DTP-3 diagnostic system. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn 2009, 39(2):43-52.
• [18]Krejci J: System for diagnosing spinal shape in humans. Olomouc: Palacky University 2007.
• [19]Rektorys K: Survey of applicable mathematics. MIT Press, Cambridge; 1969.
• [20]Berryman F, Pynsent P, Fairbank J, Disney S: A new system for measuring three-dimensional back shape in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2008, 17(5):663-672.
• [21]Krejci J, Gallo J, Salinger P, Stepanik P: Validation of the DTP-3 system designed for noninvasive spinal shape examination by means of X-ray examination. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2012, 19(3):255-262.
• [22]Scutt ND, Dangerfield PH, Dorgan JC: The relationship between surface and radiological deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: effect of change in body position. Eur Spine J 1996, 5(2):85-90.
• [23]Marks MC, Stanford CF, Mahar AT, Newton PO: Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003, 28(11):1176-1182.
• [24]Norton BJ, Sahrmann SA, Van Dillen FL: Differences in measurements of lumbar curvature related to gender and low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004, 34(9):524-534.
• [25]Kotwicki T: Evaluation of scoliosis today: examination, X-rays and beyond. Disabil Rehabil 2008, 30(10):742-751.