A comparative evaluation of PCR- based methods for species- specific determination of African animal trypanosomes in Ugandan cattle

Particle and Fibre Toxicology

Ewan T MacLeod¹  Susan C Welburn¹  Kim Picozzi¹  Heba A Ahmed² 

[1] Division of Pathway Medicine and Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK;Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44611, Egypt

关键词: Nagana;    ITS PCR;    Species-specific PCR;    Vivax;    Congolense;    Brucei;    Trypanosome;   

Others  :  823983
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-3305-6-316

 received in 2013-08-14, accepted in 2013-10-30,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

In recent years, PCR has been become widely applied for the detection of trypanosomes overcoming many of the constraints of parasitological and serological techniques, being highly sensitive and specific for trypanosome detection. Individual species-specific multi-copy trypanosome DNA sequences can be targeted to identify parasites. Highly conserved ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes are also useful for comparisons between closely related species. The internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS) in particular are relatively small, show variability among related species and are flanked by highly conserved segments to which PCR primers can be designed. Individual variations in inter-species length makes the ITS region a useful marker for identification of multiple trypanosome species within a sample.

Methods

Six hundred blood samples from cattle collected in Uganda on FTA cards were screened using individual species-specific primers for Trypanosoma congolense, Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma vivax and compared to a modified (using eluate extracted using chelex) ITS-PCR reaction.

Results

The comparative analysis showed that the species-specific primer sets showed poor agreement with the ITS primer set. Using species-specific PCR for Trypanozoon, a prevalence of 10.5% was observed as compared to 0.2% using ITS PCR (Kappa = 0.03). For Trypanosoma congolense, the species-specific PCR reaction indicated a prevalence of 0% compared to 2.2% using ITS PCR (Kappa = 0). For T. vivax, species-specific PCR detected prevalence of 5.7% compared to 2.8% for ITS PCR (Kappa = 0.29).

Conclusions

When selecting PCR based tools to apply to epidemiological surveys for generation of prevalence data for animal trypanosomiasis, it is recommended that species-specific primers are used, being the most sensitive diagnostic tool for screening samples to identify members of Trypanozoon (T. b. brucei s.l). While ITS primers are useful for studying the prevalence of trypanosomes causing nagana (in this study the species-specific primers did not detect the presence of T. congolense) there were discrepancies between both the species-specific primers and ITS for the detection of T. vivax.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ahmed et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wastling SL, Welburn SC: Diagnosis of human sleeping sickness: sense and sensitivity. Trends Parasitol 2011, 27:394-402.
• [2]Masake RA, Njuguna JT, Brown CC, Majiwa PA: The application of PCR-ELISA to the detection of Trypanosoma brucei and T. vivax infections in livestock. Vet Parasitol 2002, 105:179-189.
• [3]Picozzi K, Tilley A, Fevre EM, Coleman PG, Magona JW, Oditt M, Eisler MC, Welburn SC: The diagnosis of trypanosome infections: applications of novel technology for reducing disease risk. Afr J Biotech 2002, 1:39-45.
• [4]Luckins AG: Detection of antibodies in trypanoasome-infected cattle by means of microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. Trop Anim Health Prod 1977, 9:53-62.
• [5]Gibson W: Species-specific probes for the identification of the African tsetse-transmitted trypanosomes. Parasitol 2009, 136:1501-1507.
• [6]Welburn SC, Picozzi K, Fèvre EM, Coleman PG, Odiit M, Carrington M, Maudlin I: Identification of human-infective trypanosomes in animal reservoir of sleeping sickness in Uganda by means of serum-resistance-associated (SRA) gene. Lancet 2001, 358:2017-2019.
• [7]Njiokou F, Simo G, Nkinin SW, Laveissiere C, Herder S: Infection rate of Trypanosoma brucei s.l., T. vivax, T. congolense “forest type”, and T. simiae in small wild vertebrates in south Cameroon. Acta Trop 2004, 92:139-146.
• [8]Sloof P, Menke HH, Caspers MPM, Borst P: Size fractionation of Trypanosoma brucei DNA: localization of the 177-bp repeat satellite DNA and a variant surface glycoprotein gene in a mini-chromosomal DNA fraction. Nucl Acids Res 1983, 11:3889-3901.
• [9]Moser DR, Cook GA, Ochs DE, Bailey CP, McKane MR, Donelson JE: Detection of Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma brucei subspecies by DNA amplification using the polymerase chain reaction. Parasitol 1989, 99:57-66.
• [10]Clausen PH, Wiemann A, Patzelt R, Kakaire D, Poetzsch C, Mehlitz D: Use of a PCR assay for the specific and sensitive detection of Trypanosoma spp. in naturally infected dairy cattle in peri-urban Kampala, Uganda. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988, 849:21-31.
• [11]Xong HV, Vanhamme L, Chamekh M, Chimfwembe CE, Van Den Abbeele J, Pays A, Van Meirvenne N, Hamers R, De Baetselier P, Pays E: A VSG expression site-associated gene confers resistance to human serum in Trypanosoma rhodesiense. Cell 1998, 95:839-846.
• [12]Picozzi K, Carrington M, Welburn SC: A multiplex PCR that discriminates between Trypanosoma brucei brucei and zoonotic T. b. rhodesiense. Exp Parasitol 2008, 118:41-46.
• [13]Hoare CA: The Trypanosomes of Mammals: A Zoological Monograph. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publications; 1972.
• [14]Masiga DK, Smyth AJ, Hayes P, Bromidge TJ, Gibson WC: Sensitive detection of trypanosomes in tsetse flies by DNA amplification. Int J Parasitol 1992, 22:909-918.
• [15]Masake RA, Nantulya VM, Pelle R, Makau JM, Gathuo H, ole-MoiYoi OK: A species-specific antigen of Trypanosoma (Duttonella) vivax detectable in the course of infection is encoded by a differentially expressed tandemly reiterated gene. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1994, 64:207-218.
• [16]Masake RA, Majiwa PAO, Moloo SK, Makau JM, Njuguna JT, Maina M, Kabata J, Ole-MoiYoi OK, Nantulya VM: Sensitive and specific detection of Trypanosoma vivax using the polymerase chain reaction. Exp Parasitol 1997, 85:193-205.
• [17]Desquesnes M, McLaughlin G, Zoungrana A, Davila AMR: Detection and identification of Trypanosoma of African livestock through a single PCR based on internal transcribed spacer 1 of rDNA. Int J Parasitol 2001, 31:610-614.
• [18]Desquesnes M, Davila AMR: Applications of PCR-based tools for detection and identification of animal trypanosomes: a review and perspectives. Vet Parasitol 2002, 109:213-231.
• [19]Njiru ZK, Constantine CC, Guya S, Crowther J, Kiragu JM, Thompson RCA, Davila AMR: The use of ITS1 rDNA PCR in detecting pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasitol Res 2005, 95:186-192.
• [20]Cox A, Tilley A, McOdimba F, Fyfe J, Eisler MC, Hide G, Welburn SC: A PCR based assay for detection and differentiation of African trypanosome species in blood. Exp Parasitol 2005, 111:24-29.
• [21]Thumbi SM, McOdimba FA, Mosi RO, Jung’a JO: Comparative evaluation of three PCR based diagnostic assays for the detection of pathogenic trypanosomes in cattle blood. Parasit Vectors 2008, 1:46. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]de Clare Bronsvoort BM, von Wissmann B, Fèvre EM, Handel IG, Picozzi K, Welburn SC: No gold standard estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of two molecular diagnostic protocols for Trypanosoma brucei spp. in Western Kenya. PLoS One 2010, 5:e8628.
• [23]Cox AP, Tosas O, Tilley A, Picozzi K, Coleman P, Hide G, Welburn SC: Constraints to estimating the prevalence of trypanosome infections in East African zebu cattle. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:82. BioMed Central Full Text
• [24]Ahmed HA, MacLeod ET, Hide G, Welburn SC, Picozzi K: The best practice for preparation of samples from FTA®cards for diagnosis of blood borne infections using African trypanosomes as a model system. Parasit Vectors 2011, 4:68. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Kabasa JD: Public-private partnership works to stamp out sleeping sickness in Uganda. Trends Parasitol 2007, 23:191-192.
• [26]Becker S, Franco JR, Simarro PP, Stich A, Abel PM, Steverding D: Real-time PCR for detection of Trypanosoma brucei in human blood samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004, 50:193-199.
• [27]Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA: Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 1981, 86:127-37.
• [28]Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
• [29]Abramson JH: WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2011, 8:1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [30]Altman DG: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
• [31]Rodrigues AC, Campaner M, Takata CSA, Dell’Porto A, Milder RV, Takeda GF, Teixeira MMG: Brazilian isolates of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri: diagnosis and differentiation of isolates from cattle and water buffalo based on biological characteristics and randomly amplified DNA sequences. Vet Parasitol 2003, 116:185-207.
• [32]Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989.
• [33]Gashumba JK, Baker RD, Godfrey DG: Trypanosoma congolense: the distribution of enzymic variants in east and West Africa. Parasitol 1988, 96:475-486.
• [34]Auty H, Anderson NE, Picozzi K, Lembo T, Mubanga J, Hoare R, Fyumagwa RD, Mable B, Hamill L, Cleaveland S, Welburn SC: Trypanosome diversity in wildlife species from the Serengeti and Luangwa Valley ecosystems. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012, 6:e1828.