期刊论文详细信息
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
The outcome of oncoplastic techniques in defect reconstruction after resection of central breast tumors
Adel Denewer2  Aiman El-Saed1  Fayez Shehatto2  Mahmoud Mesbah2  Emad-Eldeen Hamed2  Adel Fathi2  Ahmad Senbe2  Ashraf Khater2  Sameh Roshdy2  Essam Attia2  Omar Farouk2 
[1] Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt;Surgical Oncology Department, Oncology Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词: Grisotti technique;    SSM;    Breast reconstruction;    Conservative breast surgery;    Oncoplastic breast surgery;    Central breast cancer;   
Others  :  1227037
DOI  :  10.1186/s12957-015-0688-1
 received in 2015-03-05, accepted in 2015-09-07,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Traditionally, conservative breast surgery was contraindicated in centrally located breast tumors, with total mastectomy as the treatment of choice. However, restorations of the central defects by the oncoplastic volume displacement or replacement techniques have been shown to be effective. The aim of the current study was to assess the surgical outcome of oncoplastic techniques after central breast tumors resection.

Methods

Thirty patients with central breast cancer, including two patients with Paget disease, treated at the Oncology Center of Mansoura University (Egypt) between June 2011 and December 2014 were included in this study. The oncoplastic techniques performed were Grisotti advancement rotational flap in eight (26.7 %) patients, classic skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with latissimus dorsi pedicled flap in 20 (66.7 %) patients, and skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) with latissimus dorsi pedicled flap using wise pattern inverted T incision in two (6.7 %) patients. The choice of the oncoplastic techniques depends on the achievement of free safety margins, the breast volume, and its ptotic degree.

Results

The median age was 40.5 years (range; 23–55). There were no major complications that require repeating the oncoplastic techniques. Recorded complications included wound dehiscence (4/30, 13.3 %) donor site seroma (4/30, 13.3 %), and surgical site infection (1/30, 3.3 %). The 6-month subjective patient satisfaction was excellent in 21 (70 %) patients, good in 6 (20 %) patients, and fair in 3 (10 %) patients. There was no episode of local recurrence or systemic metastasis after an average follow-up duration of 24 months (range; 6–42).

Conclusions

Restoring the central defect after resection of the central breast tumors can be safely achieved using oncoplastic procedures including the Grisotti technique or the design of SSM or SRM with immediate breast reconstruction. In our patients, these procedures yield a satisfactory esthetic outcome with lower morbidity.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Farouk et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150927085746735.pdf 2147KB PDF download
Fig. 7. 29KB Image download
Fig. 6. 29KB Image download
Fig. 5. 96KB Image download
Fig. 4. 96KB Image download
Fig. 3. 99KB Image download
Fig. 2. 87KB Image download
Fig. 1. 92KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Grisotti A, Casella D, Calabrese C. Immediate reconstruction of central quadrantectomy defects with a rotation flap—the Grisotti technique. In: Oncoplastic breast surgery; a guide to clinical practice. Fitzal F, Schrenk P, editors. Springer-Verlag Wien, New York; 2010: p.97.
  • [2]Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002; 9(2):165-8.
  • [3]Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55:240-4.
  • [4]Audretsch W, Rezai M, Kolotas C. Oncoplastic surgery: “target” volume reduction, (BCT mastopexy) lumpectomy reconstruction (BCT reconstruction) and flap supported operability in breast cancer. In: Proceedings of the second European congress on senology. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi, Viena, Austria; 1994: p.139-57.
  • [5]Schrenk P. Oncoplastic breast surgery. In: Oncoplastic breast surgery; a guide to clinical practice. Fitzal F, Schrenk P, editors. Springer-Verlag/Wien, Printed in Austria; 2010: p.29-40.
  • [6]Fitzal F, Nehrer G, Hoch D, Riedl O, Gutharc S, Deutinger M et al.. An oncoplastic procedure for central and medio-cranial breast cancer. EJSO. 2007; 33:1158-63.
  • [7]Wagner E, Schrenk P, Huemer GM, Sir A, Schreiner M, Wayand W. Central quadrantectomy with resection of the nipple-areola complex compared with mastectomy in patients with retroareolar breast cancer. Breast J. 2007; 13(6):557-63.
  • [8]Nebril BA. Oncoplastic techniques in the management of central breast cancer. CIR ESP. 2009; 85(1):14-9.
  • [9]Denewer A, Farouk O. Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome among patients with breast carcinoma? World J Surg. 2007; 31:1169-77.
  • [10]Denewer A, Setit A, Hussein O, Farouk O. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction by a new modification of extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. World J Surg. 2008; 32:2586-92.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:38次 浏览次数:19次