Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Maria Y Makuch¹  Luis Bahamondes¹ 

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil

关键词: Inequity;    Low cost;    Assisted reproductive technologies;    Infertility;   

Others  :  1139772
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7827-12-87

 received in 2014-07-07, accepted in 2014-09-01,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The overall prevalence of infertility was estimated to be 3.5–16.7% in developing countries and 6.9–9.3% in developed countries. Furthermore, according to reports from some regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence rate is 30–40%. The consequences of infertility and how it affects the lives of women in poor-resource settings, particularly in developing countries, has become an important issue to be discussed in reproductive health. In some societies, the inability to fulfill the desire to have children makes life difficult for the infertile couple. In many regions, infertility is considered a tragedy that affects not only the infertile couple or woman, but the entire family.

Methods

This is a position paper which encompasses a review of the needs of low-income infertile couples, mainly those living in developing countries, regarding access to infertility care, including ART and initiatives to provide ART at low or affordable cost. Information was gathered from the databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL, POPLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and ICTRP with the key words: infertility, low income, assisted reproductive technologies, affordable cost, low cost.

Results

There are few initiatives geared toward implementing ART procedures at low cost or at least at affordable cost in low-income populations. Nevertheless, from recent studies, possibilities have emerged for new low-cost initiatives that can help millions of couples to achieve the desire of having a biological child.

Conclusions

It is necessary for healthcare professionals and policymakers to take into account these new initiatives in order to implement ART in resource-constrained settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Bahamondes and Makuch; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Greenhall E, Vessey M: The prevalence of subfertility: a review of the current confusion and a report of two new studies. Fertil Steril 1990, 54(6):978-983.
• [2]World Health Organization: Infertility: A Tabulation of Available Data on Prevalence of Primary and Secondary Infertility. In Geneva Programme on Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning. Division of Family Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991.
• [3]Lunenfeld B, Van Steirteghem A: Infertility in the third millennium: implications for the individual, family and society: condensed meeting report from the Bertarelli Foundation’s second global conference. Hum Reprod Update 2004, 10(4):317-326.
• [4]Larsen U: Research on infertility: which definition should we use? Fertil Steril 2005, 83(4):846-852.
• [5]Rutstein SO, Iqbal HS: Infecundity, Infertility, and Childlessness in Developing Countries. Geneve, Switzerland: DHS Comparative Reports, WHO; 2004.
• [6]Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins AJ, Nygren GK: International estimates of infertility prevalence and infertility treatment seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007, 22(6):1506-1512.
• [7]Ombelet W: Reproductive healthcare systems should include accessible infertility diagnosis and treatment: an important challenge for resource poor countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 106(2):168-171.
• [8]Leke RJ, Oduma JA, Bassol-Mayagoitia S, Bacha AM, Grigor KM: Regional and geographical variations in infertility: effects of environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic factors. Environ Health Perspect 1993, 101(Suppl 2):73-80.
• [9]Daniluk J: infertility: intrapersonal and interpersonal impact. Fertil Steril 1988, 49(6):982-990.
• [10]Daniels K: Management of the psychosocial aspects of infertility. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynecol 1992, 32(1):57-61.
• [11]Langridge P: Children are not just miniature adults. Nurs Times 2005, 101(10):47.
• [12]Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlström P, Tydén T: Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod 2006, 21(2):558-564.
• [13]Dyer SJ: The value of children in African countries: insights from studies on infertility. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2007, 28(2):69-77.
• [14]Holton S, Fisher J, Rowe H: To have or not to have? Australian women’s childbearing desires, expectations and outcomes. J Pop Res 2011, 28(4):353-379.
• [15]Roberts E, Metcalfe A, Jack M, Tough SC: Factors that influence the childbearing intentions of Canadian men. Hum Reprod 2011, 26(5):1202-1208.
• [16]Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C: Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod 2012, 27(5):1375-1382.
• [17]Menning B: The emotional needs of infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1980, 34(4):313-319.
• [18]Shapiro C: Infertility and Pregnancy Loss. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
• [19]Sandelowski M: Without a child: the world of infertile women. Health Care Women Int 1988, 9(3):147-161.
• [20]Kraft AD, Palombo J, Mitchell D, Dean C, Meyers S, Schmidt AW: The psychological dimensions of infertility. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1980, 50(4):618-628.
• [21]Seibel MM, Taymor ML: Emotional aspects of infertility. Fertil Steril 1982, 37(2):137-145.
• [22]Platt JJ, Ficher I, Silver MJ: Infertile couples: personality traits and self-ideal concept discrepancies. Fertil Steril 1973, 24(12):972-976.
• [23]Elstein M: Effect of infertility on psychosexual function. Br Med J 1975, 3(5978):296-299.
• [24]Vassard D, Lund R, Pinborg A, Boivin J, Schmidt L: The impact of social relations among men and women in fertility treatment on the decision to terminate treatment. Hum Reprod 2012, 27(12):3502-3512.
• [25]Van Balen F, Trimbos-Kemper T, Verdurmen J: Perception of diagnosis and openness of patients about infertility. Patient Educ Couns 1996, 28(3):247-252.
• [26]Greil AL: Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1997, 11(11):1506-1512.
• [27]Schmidt L: Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction—what are the research priorities? Hum Fertil (Camb) 2009, 12(1):14-20.
• [28]Read SC, Carrier ME, Boucher ME, Whitley R, Bond S, Zelkowitz P: Psychosocial services for couples in infertility treatment: what do couples really want? Patient Educ Couns 2014, 94(3):390-395.
• [29]The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group: Europe the continent with the lowest fertility. Hum Reprod Updated 2010, 16(6):590-602.
• [30]Daar AS, Merali Z: Infertility and social suffering: the case of ART in developing countries. In Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Edited by Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002:15-21.
• [31]Dyer SJ, Abrahams N, Hoffman M, van der Spuy ZM: ‘Men leave me as I cannot have children’: women’s experiences with involuntary childlessness. Hum Reprod 2002, 17(6):1663-1668.
• [32]Van Balen F, Gerrits T: Quality of infertility care in poor-resource areas and the introduction of new reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 2001, 16(2):215-219.
• [33]Van Balen F: The psychologization of infertility. In Infertility Around the Globe. Edited by Inhorn MC, van Balen F. London: University of California Press; 2002:79-98.
• [34]Widge A: Sociocultural attitudes towards infertility and assisted reproduction in India. In Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Edited by Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002:60-74.
• [35]Araoye MO: Epidemiology of infertility: social problems of the infertile couple. West Afr J Med 2003, 22(2):190-196.
• [36]Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P: Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update 2008, 14(6):605-621.
• [37]Dhont N, van de Wijgert J, Coene G, Gasarabwe A, Temmerman M: ‘Mama and papa nothing’: living with infertility among an urban population in Kigali, Rwanda. Hum Reprod 2011, 26(3):623-629.
• [38]Brkovich AM, Fisher WA: Psychological distress and infertility: forty years of research. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1998, 19(4):218-228.
• [39]Inhorn MC: Right to assisted reproductive technology: overcoming infertility in low-resource countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 106(2):172-174.
• [40]Van Balen F, Bos HMW: The social and cultural consequences of being childless in poor-resources areas. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2009, 1(2):106-121.
• [41]Hammarberg K, Kirkman M: Infertility in resource-constrained settings: moving towards amelioration. Reprod Biomed Online 2013, 26(2):189-195.
• [42]Blackwell RE, Hammond KR, Steinkampf MP: A one year experience with a capitated health care plan for infertility. Fertil Steril 2001, 75(4):749-753.
• [43]Luna F: Assisted reproductive technology in Latin America: some ethical and sociocultural issues. In Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Edited by Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002:31-40.
• [44]Makuch MY, Petta CA, Osis MJ, Bahamondes L: Low priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case study. Hum Reprod 2010, 25(2):430-435.
• [45]Makuch MY, SimôniadePadua K, Petta CA, Duarte Osis MJ, Bahamondes L: Inequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod 2011, 26(8):2054-2060.
• [46]Makuch MY, Bahamondes L: Barriers to access to infertility care and assisted reproductive technology within the public health sector in Brazil. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2012, 4(4):221-226.
• [47]Steptoe PC, Edwards RG: Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978, 2(8085):366.
• [48]Vayena E, Peterson HB, Adamson D, Nygren KG: Assisted reproductive technologies in developing countries: are we caring yet? Fertil Steril 2009, 92(2):413-416.
• [49]Soullier N, Bouyer J, Pouly JL, Guibert J, Rochebrochard E: Estimating the success of an in vitro fertilization programme using multiple imputation. Hum Reprod 2008, 23(1):187-192.
• [50]Johnson MH, Everitt BJ: Essential Reproduction. Oxford: Blackwell Sciences Ltd.; 2000.
• [51]Serour GI: Reproductive and sexual health rights: 15 years after the International Conference on Population and Development. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 106(2):99-101.
• [52]Obermeyer CM: The consequences of female circumcision for health and sexuality: an update on the evidence. Cult Health Sex 2005, 7(5):443-461.
• [53]World Health Organization: Infections, pregnancies and infertility: perspectives on prevention. Fertil Steril 1987, 47(6):944-949.
• [54]Nachtigall RD: International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 2006, 85(4):871-875.
• [55]United Nations: Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, Egypt, 5–13 September 1994. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 1995. E.95.XIII.18
• [56]Nations U: The Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations; 2000.
• [57]Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD: Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. In Report of a Meeting. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002:383-385.
• [58]Hovatta O, Cooke I: Cost-effective approaches to in vitro fertilization: means to improve access. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006, 94(3):287-291.
• [59]Ombelet W, Campo R: Affordable IVF for developing countries. Reprod Biomed Online 2007, 15(3):267-265.
• [60]Gerrits T: Biomedical infertility care in low resource countries: barriers and access. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Monog 2012, 2:1-6.
• [61]European Society for Human Reproduction (ESHRE): Task Force Developing Countries and Infertility. http://www.eshre.eu/Specialty-groups/Task-Forces/Task-Force-Developing-Countries-and-Infertility webcite. (10 May 2014, date last accessed)
• [62]Okonofua FE: The case against new reproductive technologies in developing countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996, 103(10):957-962.
• [63]Hamberger L, Janson PO: Global importance of infertility and its treatment: role of fertility technologies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997, 58(1):149-158.
• [64]Kawachiya S, Segawa T, Kato K, Takehara Y, Teramoto S, Kato O: The effectiveness of clomiphene citrate in suppressing the LH surge in the minimal stimulation IVF protocol. Fertil Steril 2006, 86(Suppl. 2):S412.
• [65]Teramoto S, Kato O: Minimal ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: a large-scale retrospective study. Reprod Biomed Online 2007, 15(2):134-148.
• [66]Allersma T, Farquhar C, Cantineau AE: Natural cycle in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013., 8CD010550
• [67]Aleyamma TK, Kamath MS, Muthukumar K, Mangalaraj AM, George K: Affordable ART: a different perspective. Hum Reprod 2011, 26(12):3312-3318.
• [68]von Wolff M, Nitzschke M, Stute P, Bitterlich N, Rohner S: Low-dosage clomiphene reduces premature ovulation rates and increases transfer rates in natural-cycle IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2014, 29(2):209-215.
• [69]Kato K, Takehara Y, Segawa T, Kawachiya S, Okuno T, Kobayashi T, Bodri D, Kato O: Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of a large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012, 10:35. BioMed Central Full Text
• [70]López-Regalado ML, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Serrano M, Martínez L, Mozas J, Rodríguez-Serrano F, Fontes J, Castilla JA: Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014, 178(7):192-198.
• [71]Ercan CM, Kerimoglu OS, Sakinci M, Korkmaz C, Duru NK, Ergun A: Pregnancy outcomes in a university hospital after legal requirement for single-embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014, 175(4):163-166.
• [72]Chai J, Yeung TW, Lee VC, Li RH, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho PC, Ng EH: Live birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and obstetric outcomes of elective single and double embryo transfers: Hong Kong experience. Hong Kong Med J 2014, 20(2):102-106.
• [73]Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S: Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013., 7CD003416
• [74]Frydman R, Ranoux C: INVO: a simple, low cost effective assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod ESHRE Monographs 2008, 1:85-89.
• [75]Van Blerkom J, Ombelet W, Klerkx E, Janssen M, Dhont N, Nargund G, Campo R: First births with a simplified culture system for clinical IVF and embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2014, 28(3):310-320.
• [76]Ombelet W: The Walking Egg Project: Universal access to infertility care - from dream to reality. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2013, 5(2):161-175.
• [77]Henne MB, Bundorf MK: Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril 2008, 89(1):66-73.
• [78]van Rooij FB, van Balen F, Hermanns JM: Migrants and the meaning of parenthood: involuntary childless Turkish migrants in The Netherlands. Hum Reprod 2006, 21(7):1832-1838.
• [79]Kessler LM, Craig BM, Plosker SM, Reed DR, Quinn GP: Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States. Fertil Steril 2013, 100(4):1025-1032.
• [80]Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013, 100(3):645-650.
• [81]Ombelet W: Is global access to infertility care realistic? The Walking Egg Project. Reprod Biomed Online 2014, 28(3):267-272.
• [82]Johnson MH, Cohen J, Grudzinskas G: Accessible and affordable IVF: is Bob Edwards’ dream about to become reality? Reprod BioMed Online 2014, 28(3):265-266.
• [83]Fathalla MF, Sinding SW, Rosenfield A, Fathalla MMF: Sexual and reproductive health for all: a call for action. Lancet 2006, 368(9552):2095-2100.