Changes in sex ratio from fertilization to birth in assisted-reproductive-treatment cycles

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Antonio Cano¹  Carlos Hermenegildo³  Miguel A García-Pérez⁴  Juan J Tarín² 

[1] Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia 46010; and Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia 46017, Spain;Department of Functional Biology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia 46100, Spain;Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia 46010; and Research Unit-INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain;Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia 46100; and Research Unit-INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain

关键词: X-chromosome inactivation;    Sex ratio;    Preimplantation embryo development;    Cleavage-stage transfer;    Blastocyst-stage transfer;   

Others  :  802246
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7827-12-56

 received in 2014-04-07, accepted in 2014-06-10,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In Western gender-neutral countries, the sex ratio at birth is estimated to be approximately 1.06. This ratio is lower than the estimated sex ratio at fertilization which ranges from 1.07 to 1.70 depending on the figures of sex ratio at birth and differential embryo/fetal mortality rates taken into account to perform these estimations. Likewise, little is known about the sex ratio at implantation in natural and assisted-reproduction-treatment (ART) cycles. In this bioessay, we aim to estimate the sex ratio at fertilization and implantation using data from embryos generated by standard in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles. Thereafter, we compare sex ratios at implantation and birth in cleavage- and blastocyst-stage-transfer cycles to propose molecular mechanisms accounting for differences in post-implantation male and female mortality and thereby variations in sex ratios at birth in ART cycles.

Methods

A literature review based on publications up to December 2013 identified by PubMed database searches.

Results

Sex ratio at both fertilization and implantation is estimated to be between 1.29 and 1.50 in IVF cycles and 1.07 in ICSI cycles. Compared with the estimated sex ratio at implantation, sex ratio at birth is lower in IVF cycles (1.03 after cleavage-stage transfer and 1.25 after blastocyst-stage transfer) but similar and close to unity in ICSI cycles (0.95 after cleavage-stage transfer and 1.04 after blastocyst-stage transfer).

Conclusions

In-vitro-culture-induced precocious X-chromosome inactivation together with ICSI-induced decrease in number of trophectoderm cells in female blastocysts may account for preferential female mortality at early post-implantation stages and thereby variations in sex ratios at birth in ART cycles.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Tarín et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hesketh T, Xing ZW: Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:13271-13275.
• [2]Pergament E, Toydemir PB, Fiddler M: Sex ratio: a biological perspective of ‘Sex and the City’. Reprod Biomed Online 2002, 5:43-46.
• [3]Griffin DK, Handyside AH, Harper JC, Wilton LJ, Atkinson G, Soussis I, Wells D, Kontogianni E, Tarín J, Geber S, Ao A, Winston RML, Delhanty JDA: Clinical experience with preimplantation diagnosis of sex by dual fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1994, 11:132-143.
• [4]Viloria T, Rubio MC, Rodrigo L, Calderon G, Mercader A, Mateu E, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Pellicer A: Smoking habits of parents and male: female ratio in spermatozoa and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:2517-2522.
• [5]Bowman M, De Boer K, Cullinan R, Catt J, Jansen R: Do alterations in the sex ratio occur at fertilization? a case report using fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998, 15:320-322.
• [6]Graffelman J, Fugger EF, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD: Human live birth and sperm-sex ratios compared. Hum Reprod 1999, 14:2917-2920.
• [7]Setti AS, Figueira RC, Braga DP, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr: Gender incidence of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection-derived embryos: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 2012, 24:420-423.
• [8]Gutiérrez-Adán A, Granados J, Pintado B, De La Fuente J: Influence of glucose on the sex ratio of bovine IVM/IVF embryos cultured in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 2001, 13:361-365.
• [9]Kimura K, Spate LD, Green MP, Roberts RM: Effects of D-glucose concentration, D-fructose, and inhibitors of enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway on the development and sex ratio of bovine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev 2005, 72:201-207.
• [10]Kimura K, Iwata H, Thompson JG: The effect of glucosamine concentration on the development and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 2008, 103:228-238.
• [11]Betts DH, Madan P: Permanent embryo arrest: molecular and cellular concepts. Mol Hum Reprod 2008, 14:445-453.
• [12]Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S: Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature 1988, 332:459-461.
• [13]Munné S, Tang YX, Weier HU, Stein J, Finkelstein M, Grifo J, Cohen J: Sex distribution in arrested precompacted human embryos. Zygote 1993, 1:155-162.
• [14]Ben-Yosef D, Amit A, Malcov M, Frumkin T, Ben-Yehudah A, Eldar I, Mey-Raz N, Azem F, Altarescu G, Renbaum P, Beeri R, Varshaver I, Eldar-Geva T, Epsztejn-Litman S, Levy-Lahad E, Eiges R: Female sex bias in human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells Dev 2012, 21:363-372.
• [15]Fiala KL: On estimating the primary sex ratio from incomplete data. Am Nat 1980, 115:442-444.
• [16]Han TL, Flaherty SP, Ford JH, Matthews CD: Detection of X- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa after motile sperm isolation by swim-up. Fertil Steril 1993, 60:1046-1051.
• [17]De Jonge CJ, Flaherty SP, Barnes AM, Swann NJ, Matthews CD: Failure of multitube sperm swim-up for sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1997, 67:1109-1114.
• [18]Yan J, Feng HL, Chen ZJ, Hu J, Gao X, Qin Y: Influence of swim-up time on the ratio of X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006, 129:150-154.
• [19]Moohan JM, Lindsay KS: Spermatozoa selected by a discontinuous percoll density gradient exhibit better motion characteristics, more hyperactivation, and longer survival than direct swim-up. Fertil Steril 1995, 64:160-165.
• [20]Lin SP, Lee RK, Tsai YJ, Hwu YM, Lin MH: Separating X-bearing human spermatozoa through a discontinuous percoll density gradient proved to be inefficient by double-label fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998, 15:565-569.
• [21]Grant VJ, Chamley LW: Can mammalian mothers influence the sex of their offspring peri-conceptually? Reproduction 2010, 140:425-433.
• [22]Ellis PJ, Yu Y, Zhang S: Transcriptional dynamics of the sex chromosomes and the search for offspring sex-specific antigens in sperm. Reproduction 2011, 142:609-619.
• [23]Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Baker VL, Ginsburg E, Stern JE, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group: The sex ratio of singleton offspring in assisted-conception pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2009, 92:1579-1585.
• [24]Dean JH, Chapman MG, Sullivan EA: The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures–an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002–2006. BJOG 2010, 117:1628-1634.
• [25]Chang HJ, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH: Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2009, 91:2381-2390.
• [26]Ericson A, Källén B: Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2001, 16:504-509.
• [27]Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991–1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983–1999). Hum Reprod 2002, 17:671-694.
• [28]Fedder J, Loft A, Parner ET, Rasmussen S, Pinborg A: Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm: a controlled national cohort study. Hum Reprod 2013, 28:230-240.
• [29]Maalouf WE, Mincheva MN, Campbell BK, Hardy IC: Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertil Steril 2014, 101:1321-1325.
• [30]Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D: The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril 2011, 95:520-524.
• [31]Ray PF, Conaghan J, Winston RM, Handyside AH: Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1995, 104:165-171.
• [32]Richter KS, Anderson M, Osborn BH: Selection for faster development does not bias sex ratios resulting from blastocyst embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2006, 12:460-465.
• [33]Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Cioppettini FV, Miller KA, Scott RT Jr, Frattarelli JL: Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2009, 92:913-917.
• [34]Weston G, Osianlis T, Catt J, Vollenhoven B: Blastocyst transfer does not cause a sex-ratio imbalance. Fertil Steril 2009, 92:1302-1305.
• [35]Krackow S: The developmental asynchrony hypothesis for sex ratio manipulation. J Theor Biol 1995, 176:273-280.
• [36]Tarín JJ, Bernabeu R, Baviera A, Bonada M, Cano A: Sex selection may be inadvertently performed in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programmes. Hum Reprod 1995, 10:2992-2998.
• [37]Krackow S, Burgoyne PS: Timing of mating, developmental asynchrony and the sex ratio in mice. Physiol Behav 1998, 63:81-84.
• [38]Jiménez A, Fernández R, Madrid-Bury N, Moreira PN, Borque C, Pintado B, Gutiérrez-Adán A: Experimental demonstration that pre- and post-conceptional mechanisms influence sex ratio in mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2003, 66:162-165.
• [39]Lee JT, Bartolomei MS: X-inactivation, imprinting, and long noncoding RNAs in health and disease. Cell 2013, 152:1308-1323.
• [40]Lessing D, Lee JT: X chromosome inactivation and epigenetic responses to cellular reprogramming. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013, 14:85-110.
• [41]Hemberger M: Epigenetic landscape required for placental development. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007, 64:2422-2436.
• [42]Gasperowicz M, Natale DR: Establishing three blastocyst lineages–then what? Biol Reprod 2011, 84:621-630.
• [43]van den Berg IM, Laven JS, Stevens M, Jonkers I, Galjaard RJ, Gribnau J, van Doorninck JH: X chromosome inactivation is initiated in human preimplantation embryos. Am J Hum Genet 2009, 84:771-779.
• [44]Okamoto I, Patrat C, Thépot D, Peynot N, Fauque P, Daniel N, Diabangouaya P, Wolf JP, Renard JP, Duranthon V, Heard E: Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development. Nature 2011, 472:370-374.
• [45]Teklenburg G, Weimar CH, Fauser BC, Macklon N, Geijsen N, Heijnen CJ, de Sousa Lopes SM C, Kuijk EW: Cell lineage specific distribution of H3K27 trimethylation accumulation in an in vitro model for human implantation. PLoS One 2012, 7:e32701.
• [46]Migeon BR: Why females are mosaics, X-chromosome inactivation, and sex differences in disease. Gend Med 2007, 4:97-105.
• [47]Renault NK, Pritchett SM, Howell RE, Greer WL, Sapienza C, Orstavik KH, Hamilton DC: Human X-chromosome inactivation pattern distributions fit a model of genetically influenced choice better than models of completely random choice. Eur J Hum Genet 2013, 21:1396-1402.
• [48]Brown CJ, Greally JM: A stain upon the silence: genes escaping X inactivation. Trends Genet 2003, 19:432-438.
• [49]Aiken CE, Ozanne SE: Sex differences in developmental programming models. Reproduction 2013, 145:R1-13.
• [50]Hemberger M: The role of the X chromosome in mammalian extra embryonic development. Cytogenet Genome Res 2002, 99:210-217. ç45
• [51]Schulz EG, Heard E: Role and control of X chromosome dosage in mammalian development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013, 23:109-115.
• [52]Lengner CJ, Gimelbrant AA, Erwin JA, Cheng AW, Guenther MG, Welstead GG, Alagappan R, Frampton GM, Xu P, Muffat J, Santagata S, Powers D, Barrett CB, Young RA, Lee JT, Jaenisch R, Mitalipova M: Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 2010, 141:872-883. ç48
• [53]Bontekoe S, Mantikou E, van Wely M, Seshadri S, Repping S, Mastenbroek S: Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012., 7CD008950
• [54]Oliveira CS, Saraiva NZ, Cruz MH, Mazeti B, Oliveira LZ, Lopes FL, Garcia JM: HDAC inhibition decreases XIST expression on female IVP bovine blastocysts. Reproduction 2013, 145:9-17.
• [55]Shen Y, Matsuno Y, Fouse SD, Rao N, Root S, Xu R, Pellegrini M, Riggs AD, Fan G: X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:4709-4714.
• [56]Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A: Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012., 7CD002118
• [57]van der Gaast MH, Classen-Linke I, Krusche CA, Beier-Hellwig K, Fauser BC, Beier HM, Macklon NS: Impact of ovarian stimulation on mid-luteal endometrial tissue and secretion markers of receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online 2008, 17:553-563.
• [58]Bourgain C, Devroey P: The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update 2003, 9:515-522.
• [59]Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC: Serum HCG measured in the peri-implantation period predicts IVF cycle outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2012, 25:248-253.
• [60]Poikkeus P, Hiilesmaa V, Tiitinen A: Serum HCG 12 days after embryo transfer in predicting pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 2002, 17:1901-1905.
• [61]Eiben B, Bartels I, Bähr-Porsch S, Borgmann S, Gatz G, Gellert G, Goebel R, Hammans W, Hentemann M, Osmers R, Rauskolb R, Hansmannt I: Cytogenetic analysis of 750 spontaneous abortions with the direct-preparation method of chorionic villi and its implications for studying genetic causes of pregnancy wastage. Am J Hum Genet 1990, 47:656-663.
• [62]Yusuf RZ, Naeem R: Cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception: a relationship revisited. Am J Reprod Immunol 2004, 52:88-96.
• [63]Huether CA, Martin RL, Stoppelman SM, D’Souza S, Bishop JK, Torfs CP, Lorey F, May KM, Hanna JS, Baird PA, Kelly JC: Sex ratios in fetuses and liveborn infants with autosomal aneuploidy. Am J Med Genet 1996, 63:492-500.
• [64]Dumoulin JC, Derhaag JG, Bras M, Van Montfoort AP, Kester AD, Evers JL, Geraedts JP, Coonen E: Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:484-491.
• [65]James WH: The human sex ratio part 1: a review of the literature. Hum Biol 1987, 59:721-752.
• [66]James WH: The variation of the probability of a son within and across couples. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:1184-1188.