Are surgeons and anesthesiologists lying to each other or gaming the system? A national random sample survey about “truth-telling practices” in the perioperative setting in the United States

Patient Safety in Surgery

Scott Segal⁶  Matthew Wynia⁴  Anthony Kirwan³  Yan Ma¹  Yuo-yu Lee⁵  Michael Nurok² 

[1] George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA;Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Heart Institute, 127 San Vicente Blvd, Suite 3100, Los Angeles 90048, CA, USA;Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA;Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA;Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

关键词: Perioperative;    Truth-Telling;    Professionalism;    Communication;    Teamwork;   

Others  :  1232612
DOI  :  10.1186/s13037-015-0080-7

 received in 2015-07-06, accepted in 2015-11-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The perioperative setting demands strong teamwork to ensure safe patient care, but anecdotally surgeons and anesthesiologists are not always fully truthful with each other. The present study sought to determine the frequency of misrepresentation of the truth in the perioperative setting.

Methods

Direct mailed survey in the United States about misrepresenting information to colleagues in a national random sample of 1130 anesthesiologists and 1130 surgeons.

Results

Reflecting the sensitive nature of these questions, only 252 (11 %) surveys were returned-128/1130 by anesthesiologists and 124/1130 by surgeons. While modest numbers of both anesthesiologists (34/128, 27 %) and surgeons (8/124, 7 %) acknowledged misreporting information at least once per month, misreporting was considerably more common among responding anesthesiologists. Among anesthesiologists the majority (68 %) were concerned that surgeons misreported information to them once a month or more often, though only 8 % of surgeons shared reciprocal concerns. More than a third of responding anesthesiologists (36 %) reported having seen their teachers misreport information to surgeons during their training.

Conclusions

These findings, though preliminary due to the small sample, raise concerns about a possible culture of misrepresentation, passed on between generations, in some perioperative environments. Misreporting of information should be examined in more detail and addressed at local levels whenever it is found. Further research is required to determine if the reported behaviors represent routine gaming of perioperative care systems or deliberate and intentional deception. Strategies aimed at fostering conditions in which open honest communication can thrive should be investigated.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Nurok et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y, Carney BT, West P, Berger DH et al.. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA. 2010; 304:1693-1700.
• [2]Nurok M, Sundt TM, Frankel A. Teamwork and communication in the operating room: relationship to discrete outcomes and research challenges. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011; 29:1-11.
• [3]Assessing 21st century skills: summary of a workshop. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC); 2011.
• [4]Leape LL, Shore MF, Dienstag JL, Mayer RJ, Edgman-Levitan S, Meyer GS et al.. Perspective: a culture of respect, part 1: the nature and causes of disrespectful behavior by physicians. Acad Med. 2012; 87:845-852.
• [5]Leape LL, Shore MF, Dienstag JL, Mayer RJ, Edgman-Levitan S, Meyer GS et al.. Perspective: a culture of respect, part 2: creating a culture of respect. Acad Med. 2012; 87:853-858.
• [6]Freeman VG, Rathore SS, Weinfurt KP, Schulman KA, Sulmasy DP. Lying for patients: physician deception of third-party payers. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159:2263-2270.
• [7]Wynia MK, Cummins DS, VanGeest JB, Wilson IB. Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients: between a rock and a hard place. JAMA. 2000; 283:1858-1865.
• [8]Werner RM, Alexander GC, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Lying to insurance companies: the desire to deceive among physicians and the public. Am J Bioeth. 2004; 4:53-59.
• [9]Novack DH, Plumer R, Smith RL, Ochitill H, Morrow GR, Bennett JM. Changes in physicians’ attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. JAMA. 1979; 241:897-900.
• [10]Wright IH, Kooperberg C, Bonar BA, Bashein G. Statistical modeling to predict elective surgery time. Comparison with a computer scheduling system and surgeon-provided estimates. Anesthesiology. 1996; 85:1235-1245.
• [11]Strum DP, Sampson AR, May JH, Vargas LG. Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92:1454-1466.
• [12]Eijkemans MJC, van Houdenhoven M, Nguyen T, Boersma E, Steyerberg EW, Kazemier G. Predicting the unpredictable: a new prediction model for operating room times using individual characteristics and the surgeon’s estimate. Anesthesiology. 2010; 112:41-49.
• [13]van Schalkwyk JM, Lowes D, Frampton C, Merry AF. Does manual anaesthetic record capture remove clinically important data? Br J Anaesth. 2011; 107:546-552.
• [14]Wauben LSGL, van Grevenstein WMU, Goossens RHM, van der Meulen FH, Lange JF. Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011; 98:1431-1436.
• [15]Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, Bonacum D, Brookey J, Graham S et al.. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009; 197:678-685.
• [16]Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat A-HS, Dellinger EP et al.. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20:102-107.
• [17]Asch DA. The role of critical care nurses in euthanasia and assisted suicide. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1374-1379.
• [18]Muller JH. Shades of blue: the negotiation of limited codes by medical residents. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 34:885-898.