Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in apparently healthy and CVBD-suspect dogs in Portugal - a national serological study

Particle and Fibre Toxicology

Luís Madeira de Carvalho³  Cláudio Mendão²  Luís Cardoso¹ 

[1] Parasite Disease Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Universidade do Porto, Portugal;Bayer Portugal S.A., Animal Health Division, Carnaxide, Portugal;Interdisciplinary Centre for Research in Animal Health (CIISA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal

关键词: Portugal;    Leishmania infantum;    In-Clinic ELISA Tests;    Epidemiology;    Ehrlichia canis;    Dirofilaria immitis;    Dogs;    Canine Vector-Borne Diseases;    Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato;    Anaplasma spp.;   

Others  :  1233014
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-3305-5-62

 received in 2012-01-11, accepted in 2012-03-27,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) are caused by a wide range of pathogens transmitted to dogs by arthropods including ticks and insects. Many CVBD-agents are of zoonotic concern, with dogs potentially serving as reservoirs and sentinels for human infections. The present study aimed at assessing the seroprevalence of infection with or exposure to Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in dogs in Portugal.

Methods

Based on 120 veterinary medical centres from all the regions of mainland and insular Portugal, 557 apparently healthy and 628 CVBD-suspect dogs were sampled. Serum, plasma or whole blood was tested for qualitative detection of D. immitis antigen and antibodies to E. canis, B. burgdorferi s. l., Anaplasma spp. and L. infantum with two commercial in-clinic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors of exposure to the vector-borne agents.

Results

Total positivity levels to D. immitis, E. canis, B. burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., L. infantum, one or more agents and mixed agents were 3.6%, 4.1%, 0.2%, 4.5%, 4.3%, 14.0% and 2.0% in the healthy group, and 8.9%, 16.4%, 0.5%, 9.2%, 25.2%, 46.3% and 11.6% in the clinically suspect group, respectively. Non-use of ectoparasiticides was a risk factor for positivity to one or more agents both in the apparently healthy (OR = 2.1) and CVBD-suspect (OR = 1.5) dogs. Seropositivity to L. infantum (OR = 7.6), E. canis (OR = 4.1) and D. immitis (OR = 2.4) were identified as risk factors for the presence of clinical signs compatible with CVBDs. Positivity to mixed agents was not found to be a risk factor for disease.

Conclusions

Dogs in Portugal are at risk of becoming infected with vector-borne pathogens, some of which are of zoonotic concern. CVBDs should be considered by practitioners and prophylactic measures must be put in place to protect dogs and limit the risk of transmission of vector-borne agents to humans. This study is expected to give veterinary and public health authorities an increased awareness about CVBDs in Portugal and to serve as a reference for future investigations and control actions.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Cardoso et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Day MJ: One health: the importance of companion animal vector-borne diseases. Parasit Vectors 2011, 4:49. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB: Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: part one. Trends Parasitol 2009, 25:157-163.
• [3]Day MJ: The immunopathology of canine vector-borne diseases. Parasit Vectors 2011, 4:48. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]McCall JW, Genchi C, Kramer LH, Guerrero J, Venco L: Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Adv Parasitol 2008, 66:193-285.
• [5]Dantas-Torres F: Canine vector-borne diseases in Brazil. Parasit Vectors 2008, 1:25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F: Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: current situation and perspectives. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Araujo AM: Canine and human Dirofilaria immitis infections in Portugal. A review [abstract]. Parassitologia 1996, 38(Suppl 1-2):366.
• [8]Irwin PJ, Jefferies R: Arthropod-transmitted diseases of companion animals in Southeast Asia. Trends Parasitol 2004, 20:27-34.
• [9]Shaw SE, Day MJ, Birtles RJ, Breitschwerdt EB: Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs. Trends Parasitol 2001, 17:74-80.
• [10]Neer TM, Breitschwerdt EB, Greene RT, Lappin MR: Consensus statement on ehrlichial disease of small animals from the infectious disease study group of the ACVIM. J Vet Intern Med 2002, 16:309-315.
• [11]Harrus S, Bark H, Waner T: Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: an update. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1997, 19:431-444.
• [12]Perez M, Bodor M, Zhang C, Xiong Q, Rikihisa Y: Human infection with Ehrlichia canis accompanied by clinical signs in Venezuela. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1078:110-117.
• [13]Fritz CL: Emerging tick-borne diseases. Vet Clin Small Anim 2009, 39:265-278.
• [14]Steere AC: Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:115-125.
• [15]Littman MP, Goldstein RE, Labato MA, Lappin MR, Moore GE: ACVIM small animal consensus statement on Lyme disease in dogs: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. J Vet Intern Med 2006, 20:422-434.
• [16]Alleman AR, Wamsley HL: An update on anaplasmosis in dogs. Vet Med 2008, 103:212-220.
• [17]Egenvall AE, Hedhammar AA, Bjoersdorff AI: Clinical features and serology of 14 dogs affected by granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Sweden. Vet Rec 1997, 140:222-226.
• [18]Dumler JS, Choi KS, Garcia-Garcia JC, Barat NS, Scorpio DG, Garyu JW, Grab DJ, Bakken JS: Human granulocytic anaplasmosis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Emerg Infect Dis 2005, 11:1828-1834.
• [19]Harrus S, Aroch I, Lavy E, Bark H: Clinical manifestations of infectious canine cyclic thrombocytopenia. Vet Rec 1997, 141:247-250.
• [20]Solano-Gallego L, Miró G, Koutinas A, Cardoso L, Pennisi MG, Ferrer L, Bourdeau P, Oliva G, Baneth G: LeishVet guidelines for the practical management of canine leishmaniosis. Parasit Vectors 2011, 4:86. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Koutinas AF, Polizopoulou ZS, Saridomichelakis MN, Argyriadis D, Fytianou A, Plevraki KG: Clinical considerations on canine visceral leishmaniasis in Greece: a retrospective study of 158 cases (1989-1996). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999, 35:376-383.
• [22]Molina R, Amela C, Nieto J, San-Andrés M, González F, Castillo JA, Lucientes J, Alvar J: Infectivity of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum to colonized Phlebotomus perniciosus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1994, 88:491-493.
• [23]Desjeux P: Worldwide increasing risk factors for leishmaniasis. Med Microbiol Immunol 2001, 190:77-79.
• [24]Palatnik-de-Sousa CB, Day MJ: One Health: the global challenge of epidemic and endemic leishmaniasis. Parasit Vectors 2011, 4:197. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Cardoso L, Yisaschar-Mekuzas Y, Rodrigues FT, Costa A, Machado J, Diz-Lopes D, Baneth G: Canine babesiosis in northern Portugal and molecular characterization of vector-borne co-infections. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Gaunt S, Beall M, Stillman B, Lorentzen L, Diniz P, Chandrashekar R, Breitschwerdt E: Experimental infection and co-infection of dogs with Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis: hematologic, serologic and molecular findings. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:33. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Bowman D, Little SE, Lorentzen L, Shields J, Sullivan MP, Carlin EP: Prevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in the United States: results of a national clinic-based serologic survey. Vet Parasitol 2009, 160:138-148.
• [28]Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB: Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: part two. Trends Parasitol 2009, 25:228-235.
• [29]Casimiro E, Calheiros J, Santos FD, Kovats S: National assessment of human health effects of climate change in Portugal: approach and key findings. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114:1950-1956.
• [30]Gray JS, Dautel H, Estrada-Peña A, Kahl O, Lindgren E: Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Europe. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2009, 2009:593232.
• [31]Menn B, Lorentz S, Naucke TJ: Imported and travelling dogs as carriers of canine vector-borne pathogens in Germany. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:34. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Seixas R, Alho AM, Guerra D, Madeira de Carvalho L: Doenças caninas de transmissão vectorial: uma picada com muitas consequências! Vet Med 2011, (77):23-46.
• [33]Maia C, Campino L, Marques M, Cristóvão J, Ramada J, Neves R, Cardoso L, Cortes S: "A semana da leishmaniose" - ONLeish. Resultados preliminares. Acta Parasitol Port 2009, 16:22-23.
• [34]Chandrashekar R, Mainville CA, Beall MJ, O'Connor T, Eberts MD, Alleman AR, Gaunt SD, Breitschwerdt EB: Performance of a commercially available in-clinic ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, and Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2010, 71:1443-1450.
• [35]O'Connor TP, Hanscom JL, Hegarty BC, Groat RG, Breitschwerdt EB: Comparison of an indirect immunofluorescence assay, western blot analysis, and a commercially available ELISA for detection of Ehrlichia canis antibodies in canine sera. Am J Vet Res 2006, 67:206-210.
• [36]Philipp MT, Bowers LC, Fawcett PT, Jacobs MB, Liang FT, Marques AR, Mitchell PD, Purcell JE, Ratterree MS, Straubinger RK: Antibody response to IR6, a conserved immunodominant region of the VlsE lipoprotein, wanes rapidly after antibiotic treatment of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in experimental animals and in humans. J Infect Dis 2001, 184:870-878.
• [37]O'Connor TP, Esty KJ, Hanscom JL, Shields P, Philipp MT: Dogs vaccinated with common Lyme disease vaccines do not respond to IR6, the conserved immunodominant region of the VlsE surface protein of Borrelia burgdorferi. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2004, 11:458-462.
• [38]Lim S, Irwin PJ, Lee S, Oh M, Ahn K, Myung B, Shin S: Comparison of selected canine vector-borne diseases between urban animal shelter and rural hunting dogs in Korea. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:32. BioMed Central Full Text
• [39]Ferroglio E, Centaro E, Mignone W, Trisciuoglio A: Evaluation of an ELISA rapid device for the serological diagnosis of Leishmania infantum infection in dog as compared with immunofluorescence assay and Western blot. Vet Parasitol 2007, 144:162-166.
• [40]Petrie A, Watson P: Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.
• [41]Pantchev N, Schaper R, Limousin S, Norden N, Weise M, Lorentzen L: Occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis in domestic dogs in France: results of a countrywide serologic survey. Parasitol Res 2009, 105(Suppl 1):S101-114.
• [42]Atkins CE: Comparison of results of three commercial heartworm antigen test kits in dogs with low heartworm burdens. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003, 222:1221-1223.
• [43]Figueiredo TCD: Estudo da prevalência de doenças associadas a vectores em canídeos domésticos do distrito de Bragança. In MSc dissertation. Lisbon University, Faculty of Medicine; 2008.
• [44]Cardoso L, Tuna J, Vieira L, Yisaschar-Mekuzas Y, Baneth G: Molecular detection of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis in dogs from the North of Portugal. Vet J 2008, 183:232-233.
• [45]Alexandre N, Santos AS, Núncio MS, Sousa R, Boinas F, Bacellar F: Detection of Ehrlichia canis by polymerase chain reaction in dogs from Portugal. Vet J 2009, 181:343-344.
• [46]Caeiro V: General review of tick species present in Portugal. Parassitologia 1999, 41(Suppl 1):11-15.
• [47]Matuschka F-R, Klug B, Schinkel TW, Spielman A, Richter D: Diversity of European Lyme disease spirochetes at the southern margin of their range. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64:1980-1982.
• [48]De Michelis S, Sewell HS, Collares-Pereira M, Santos-Reis M, Schouls LM, Benes V, Holmes EC, Kurtenbach K: Genetic diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks from mainland Portugal. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38:2128-2133.
• [49]Alexandre NML: Estudo clínico e epidemiológico da febre botonosa, ehrlichiose canina e borreliose de Lyme numa população de canídeos domésticos do Algarve. In MSc dissertation. Technical University of Lisbon, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; 2006.
• [50]Santos AS, Bacellar F, Dumler JS: A 4-year study of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Portugal. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009, 15(Suppl 2):46-47.
• [51]Santos AS, Alexandre N, Sousa R, Núncio MS, Bacellar F, Dumler JS: Serological and molecular survey of Anaplasma species infection in dogs with suspected tickborne disease in Portugal. Vet Rec 2009, 164:168-171.
• [52]Cardoso L, Mendão C: Inquérito sobre a leishmaniose canina em Portugal - resultados preliminares. Vet Med 2009, (52):57-62.
• [53]Dantas-Torres F: Biology and ecology of the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3:26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [54]Otranto D, de Caprariis D, Lia RP, Tarallo V, Lorusso V, Testini G, Dantas-Torres F, Latrofa S, Diniz PP, Mencke N, Maggi RG, Breitschwerdt E, Capelli G, Stanneck D: Prevention of endemic canine vector-borne diseases using imidacloprid 10% and permethrin 50% in young dogs: a longitudinal field study. Vet Parasitol 2010, 172:323-332.
• [55]McCall JW, Baker CF, Mather TN, Chester ST, McCall SD, Irwin JP, Young SL, Cramer LG, Pollmeier MG: The ability of a topical novel combination of fipronil, amitraz and (S)-methoprene to protect dogs from Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infections transmitted by Ixodes scapularis. Vet Parasitol 2011, 179:335-342.
• [56]Cardoso L: Dogs, arthropod-transmitted pathogens and zoonotic diseases. Trends Parasitol 2010, 26:61-62.
• [57]Carrade D, Foley J, Sullivan M, Foley CW, Sykes JE: Spatial distribution of seroprevalence for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Washington, Oregon, and California. Vet Clin Pathol 2011, 40:293-302.