Evaluation of emergency department performance – a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Jakob Lundager Forberg¹  Peter Jacobsen²  Christian Michel Sørup² 

[1] The Emergency Department, Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark;DTU Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, building 424, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

关键词: Quality;    Quality improvement;    Emergency department;    Indicators;    Measures;    Performance;   

Others  :  810817
DOI  :  10.1186/1757-7241-21-62

 received in 2013-01-23, accepted in 2013-08-05,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Evaluation of emergency department (ED) performance remains a difficult task due to the lack of consensus on performance measures that reflects high quality, efficiency, and sustainability.

Aim

To describe, map, and critically evaluate which performance measures that the published literature regard as being most relevant in assessing overall ED performance.

Methods

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of review articles reporting accentuated ED performance measures was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria includes: 1) the main purpose was to discuss, analyse, or promote performance measures best reflecting ED performance, 2) the article was a review article, and 3) the article reported macro-level performance measures, thus reflecting an overall departmental performance level.

Results

A number of articles addresses this study’s objective (n = 14 of 46 unique hits). Time intervals and patient-related measures were dominant in the identified performance measures in review articles from US, UK, Sweden and Canada. Length of stay (LOS), time between patient arrival to initial clinical assessment, and time between patient arrivals to admission were highlighted by the majority of articles. Concurrently, “patients left without being seen” (LWBS), unplanned re-attendance within a maximum of 72 hours, mortality/morbidity, and number of unintended incidents were the most highlighted performance measures that related directly to the patient. Performance measures related to employees were only stated in two of the 14 included articles.

Conclusions

A total of 55 ED performance measures were identified. ED time intervals were the most recommended performance measures followed by patient centeredness and safety performance measures. ED employee related performance measures were rarely mentioned in the investigated literature. The study’s results allow for advancement towards improved performance measurement and standardised assessment across EDs.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Sørup et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Alberti G: Transforming emergency care in England. 2005. http://aace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Transforming-Emergency-Care-in-England.pdf webcite
• [2]Danish Health and Medicines Authority: Styrket akutberedskab - planlægningsgrundlag for det regionale sundhedsvæsen. 2007. http://www.sst.dk/publ/publ2007/plan/akutberedskab/styrketakutberedskab.pdf webcite
• [3]Solberg LI, Asplin BR, Weinick RM, Magid DJ: Emergency department crowding: consensus development of potential measures. Ann Emerg Med 2003, 42(6):824-834.
• [4]Walley P, Silvester K, Mountford S: Health-care process improvement decisions: a systems perspective. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2006, 19(1):93-104.
• [5]Shetty A, Gunja N, Byth K, Vukasovic M: Senior streaming assessment further evaluation after Triage zone: a novel model of care encompassing various emergency department throughput measures. Emerg Med Australas 2012, 24(4):374-382.
• [6]Hallas P, Ekelund U, Bjornsen LP, Brabrand M: Hoping for a domino effect: a new specialty in Sweden is a breath of fresh air for the development of Scandinavian emergency medicine. SJTREM 2013, 21(1):26.
• [7]Göransson KE, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M: Triage in emergency departments: national survey. J Clin Nurs 2005, 14(9):1067-1074.
• [8]Graff L, Stevens C, Spaite D, Foody J: Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2002, 9(11):1091-1107.
• [9]Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K: Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. IJOPM 2005, 25(12):1228-1263.
• [10]Kaplan RS, Norton DP: The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev (USA) 2005, 83(7):172-180.
• [11]Nicolay CR, Purkayastha S, Greenhalgh A, Benn J, Chaturvedi S, Phillips N, Darzi A: Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare. Br J Surg 2012, 99(3):324-335.
• [12]Neely A, Bourne M: Why measurement initatives fail. MBE 2000, 4(4):3-7.
• [13]Huang S, Chen P, Yang M, Chang W, Lee H: Using a balanced scorecard to improve the performance of an emergency department. Nurs Econ 2004, 22(3):140-146.
• [14]Samani DZ, Kohan MZ: Framework for implementing balanced scorecard in hospitals. JIBED 2011, 5(4):362-368.
• [15]Alessandrini EA, Knapp J: Measuring quality in pediatric emergency care. Clin Ped Emerg Med 2011, 12(2):102-112.
• [16]Coleman P, Nicholl J: Consensus methods to identify a set of potential performance indicators for systems of emergency and urgent care. J Health Serv Res Policy 2010, 15:12-18.
• [17]Kelman S, Friedman JN: Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: an empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. JPART 2009, 19(4):917-946.
• [18]Department of Health: A&E Clinical Quality Indicators - data definitions. 2011. http://www.fadelibrary.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/09/AE-clinical-quality-indicators-data-definitions.pdf webcite
• [19]Cameron PA, Schull MJ, Cooke MW: A framework for measuring quality in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2011, 28(9):735-740.
• [20]Lindsay P, Schull M, Bronskill S, Anderson G: The development of indicators to measure the quality of clinical care in emergency departments following a modified-Delphi approach. Acad Emerg Med 2002, 9(11):1131-1139.
• [21]Schull MJ, Guttmann A, Leaver CA, Vermeulen M, Hatcher CM, Rowe BH, Zwarenstein M, Anderson GM: Prioritizing performance measurement for emergency department care: consensus on evidence-based quality of care indicators. CJEM 2011, 13(5):300-309.
• [22]Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010, 8(5):336-341.
• [23]Traberg A: Management-By-Objectives in Healthcare. Technical University of Denmark: DTU Management Engineering; 2011. [PhD Thesis]
• [24]Persell SD, Kaiser D, Dolan NC, Andrews B, Levi S, Khandekar J, Gavagan T, Thompson JA, Friesema EM, Baker DW: Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record-based quality improvement system. Med Care 2011, 49(2):117-125.
• [25]Stelfox HT, Bobranska-Artiuch B, Nathens A, Straus SE: A systematic review of quality indicators for evaluating pediatric trauma care. Crit Care Med 2010, 38(4):1187-1196.
• [26]Stelfox HT, Straus SE, Nathens A, Bobranska-Artiuch B: Evidence for quality indicators to evaluate adult trauma care: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2011, 39(4):846-859.
• [27]Pines JM, Fermann GJ, Ferroggiaro AA, Irvin CB, Mazer M, Frank Peacock W, Schuur JD, Weber EJ, Pollack CV: The role of the society for academic emergency medicine in the development of guidelines and performance measures. Acad Emerg Med 2010, 17(11):e130-e140.
• [28]Baker DW, Qaseem A: Evidence-based performance measures: preventing unintended consequences of quality measurement. Ann Intern Med 2011, 155(9):638-640.
• [29]Beniuk K, Boyle AA, Clarkson PJ: Emergency department crowding: prioritising quantified crowding measures using a Delphi study. Emerg Med J 2012, 29(11):868-871.
• [30]Hung GR, Chalut D: A consensus-established set of important indicators of pediatric emergency department performance. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008, 24(1):9-15.
• [31]Guttmann A, Razzaq A, Lindsay P, Zagorski B, Anderson G: Development of measures of the quality of emergency department care for children using a structured panel process. Pediatrics 2006, 118(1):114-123.
• [32]Welch SJ, Asplin BR, Stone-Griffith S, Davidson SJ, Augustine J, Schuur J: Emergency department operational metrics, measures and definitions: results of the second performance measures and benchmarking summit. Ann Emerg Med 2011, 58(1):33-40.
• [33]McClelland MS, Jones K, Siegel B, Pines JM: A field test of time-based emergency department quality measures. Ann Emerg Med 2012, 59(1):1-10. e2
• [34]Ekelund U, Kurland L, Eklund F, Torkki P, Letterstål A, Lindmarker P, Castrén M: Patient throughput times and inflow patterns in Swedish emergency departments. A basis for ANSWER, A National SWedish emergency registry. SJTREM 2011, 19(1):19-37.
• [35]Heyworth J: Emergency medicine - quality indicators: the United Kingdom perspective. Acad Emerg Med 2011, 18(12):1239-1241.
• [36]Sibbritt D, Isbister GK, Walker R: Emergency department performance indicators that encompass the patient journey. Qual Manag Health Care 2006, 15(1):27-38.
• [37]Boudreaux ED, O’Hea EL: Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: a review of the literature and implications for practice. J Emerg Med 2004, 26(1):13-26.
• [38]Muntlin Å, Gunningberg L, Carlsson M: Patients’ perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement. J Clin Nurs 2006, 15(8):1045-1056.
• [39]Göransson KE, von Rosen A: Patient experience of the triage encounter in a Swedish emergency department. Int Emerg Nurs 2010, 18(1):36-40.
• [40]Crouch R, Cooke M: Making care count: introducing the emergency department quality indicators. Int Emerg Nurs 2011, 19(2):67-68.
• [41]Lin BYJ, Wan TTH, Hsu CC, Hung F, Juan C, Lin C: Relationships of hospital-based emergency department culture to work satisfaction and intent to leave of emergency physicians and nurses. Health Serv Manage Res 2012, 25(2):68-77.
• [42]Benneyan JC, Lloyd RC, Plsek PE: Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2003, 12(6):458-464.
• [43]Gordon BD, Flottemesch TJ, Asplin BR: Accuracy of staff-initiated emergency department tracking system timestamps in identifying actual event times. Ann Emerg Med 2008, 52(5):504-511.
• [44]Jones P, Schimanski K: The four hour target to reduce emergency department ‘waiting time’: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Emerg Med Australas 2010, 22(5):391-398.