Social networks and female reproductive choices in the developing world: a systematized review

Reproductive Health

Spencer Moore²  Samantha MP Lowe¹ 

[1] School of Kinesiology& Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston K7L 3 N6, ON, Canada;Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston K7L 3 N6, ON, Canada

关键词: Network mechanisms;    Reproductive health;    Maternal health;    Social network analysis;   

Others  :  1131958
DOI  :  10.1186/1742-4755-11-85

 received in 2014-01-23, accepted in 2014-11-29,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Continuing high global maternal mortality and morbidity rates in developing countries have resulted in an increasing push to improve reproductive health services for women. Seeking innovative ways for assessing how positive health knowledge and behaviors spread to this vulnerable population has increased the use of social network theories and analysis in health promotion research. Despite the increased research on social networks and health, no overarching review on social networks and maternal health literature in developing countries has been conducted. This paper attempts to synthesize this literature by identifying both published and unpublished studies in major databases on social networks and maternal and child health. This review examined a range of study types for inclusion, including experimental and non-experimental study designs including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, cohort studies, case control studies, longitudinal studies, and cross-sectional observational studies. Only those that occurred in developing countries were included in the review. Eighteen eligible articles were identified; these were published between 1997 and 2012. The findings indicated that the most common social network mechanisms studied within the literature were social learning and social influence. The main outcomes studied were contraceptive use and fertility decisions. Findings suggest the need for continuing research on social networks and maternal health, particularly through the examination of the range of social mechanisms through which networks may influence health behaviors and knowledge, and the analysis of a larger variety of reproductive outcomes.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Lowe and Moore; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO: Maternal and reproductive health. [http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/en/index.html webcite]
• [2]Say L, Raine R: A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 10:812-819.
• [3]Rossier C, Bernardi L: Social interaction effects on fertility: Intentions and behaviors. Eur J Popul/Revue européenne de Démographie 2009, 25:467-485.
• [4]Dynes M, Stephenson R, Rubardt M, Bartel D: The influence of perceptions of community norms on current contraceptive use among men and women in Ethiopia and Kenya. Health Place 2012, 18:766-773.
• [5]Bove RM, Vala-Haynes E, Valeggia C: Women’s health in Urban Mali: social predictors and health itineraries. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75:1392-1399.
• [6]Marston C, Renedo A, McGowan CR, Portela A: Effects of community participation on improving uptake of skilled care for maternal and newborn health: a systematic review. PLoS One 2013, 2:e55012.
• [7]Hindin MJ, Fatusi AO: Adolescent sexual and reproductive health in developing countries: an overview of trends and interventions. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009, 2:58-62.
• [8]Valente TW, Fosados R: Diffusion of innovations and network segmentation: the part played by people in promoting health. Sex Transm Dis 2006, 2006(7):S23-S31.
• [9]Mackian S, Bedri N, Lovel H: Up the garden path and over the edge: where might health-seeking behaviour take us? Health Policy Plan 2004, 2004(3):137-146.
• [10]Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G: Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 2009, 323:892-895.
• [11]Berkman L, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman T: From social integration to health: Durkheim in the New Millennium. Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:843.
• [12]Edwards G: Mixed-Method Approaches to Social Network Analysis. National Centre for Research Methods Discussion Paper NCRM/015; 2010:1-30.
• [13]Madhavan S, Adams A, Simon D: Women’s networks and the social world of fertility behavior. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2003, 29:58-68.
• [14]Kincaid DL: Social networks, ideation, and contraceptive behavior in Bangladesh: a longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med 2000, 2:215-231.
• [15]Kohler H: Fertility and Social Interaction. An Economic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
• [16]Behrman JR, Kohler HP, Watkins SC: Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: evidence from a longitudinal study in rural Kenya. Demography 2002, 39:713-738.
• [17]Valente TW, Saba WP: Mass media and interpersonal influence in a reproductive health communication campaign in Bolivia. Commun Res 1998, 25:96-124.
• [18]Gayen K, Raeside R: Social networks, normative influence and health delivery in rural Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65:900-914.
• [19]Edmonds JK, Hruschka DH, Bernard R, Sibley L: Women’s social networks and birth attendant decisions: application of the network-episode model. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:452-459.
• [20]Gayen K, Raeside R: Social networks and contraception practice of women in rural Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71:1584-1592.
• [21]Billari FC, Philipov D, Testa MR: Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. Eur J Popul/Revue Européenne de Démographie 2009, 25:439-465.
• [22]Boulay M, Valente TW: The relationship of social affiliation and interpersonal discussion to family planning knowledge, attitudes and practice. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1999, 25:112-138.
• [23]Lindstrom DP, Muñoz‒Franco E: Migration and the diffusion of modern contraceptive knowledge and use in rural Guatemala. Stud Fam Plann 2005, 36:277-288.
• [24]Kohler HP, Behrman JR, Watkins SC: The density of social networks and fertility decisions: evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demography 2001, 38:43-58.
• [25]Musalia JM: Extraconjugal determinants of spousal communication about family planning in Kenya. Sex Roles 2003, 49:597-607.
• [26]Musalia JM: Gender, social networks, and contraceptive use in Kenya. Sex Roles 2005, 53:835-846.
• [27]Valente TW, Watkins SC, Jato MN, Van Der Straten A, Tsitsol LP: Social network associations with contraceptive use among Cameroonian women in voluntary associations. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45:677-687.
• [28]Godley J: Kinship networks and contraceptive choice in Nang Rong, Thailand. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001, 27:4-41.
• [29]Sandberg J: The influence of network mortality experience on nonnumeric response concerning expected family size: evidence from a Nepalese mountain village. Demography 2005, 42:737-756.
• [30]Meards E: Method Approaches to Social Network Analysis. National Centre for Research Methods Discussion Paper NCRM/015; 2010:1-30.
• [31]Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, Wardlaw T: Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2010, 375:2032-2044.