Home birth and barriers to referring women with obstetric complications to hospitals: a mixed-methods study in Zahedan, southeastern Iran

Reproductive Health

AbouAli Vedadhir¹  Zahra Moudi¹  Mahmoud Ghazi Tabatabaie¹ 

[1] Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14395-773, Iran

关键词: complication;    women;    maternal mortality;    delay;    referral system;    home birth;   

Others  :  820908
DOI  :  10.1186/1742-4755-9-5

 received in 2011-12-09, accepted in 2012-03-20,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

One factor that contributes to high maternal mortality in developing countries is the delayed use of Emergency Obstetric-Care (EmOC) facilities. The objective of this study was to determine the factors that hinder midwives and parturient women from using hospitals when complications occur during home birth in Sistan and Baluchestan province, Iran, where 23% of all deliveries take place in non- hospital settings.

Methods

In the study and data management, a mixed-methods approach was used. In the quantitative phase, we compared the existing health-sector data with World Health Organization (WHO) standards for the availability and use of EmOC services. The qualitative phase included collection and analysis of interviews with midwives and traditional birth attendants and twenty-one in-depth interviews with mothers. The data collected in this phase were managed according to the principles of qualitative data analysis.

Results

The findings demonstrate that three distinct factors lead to indecisiveness and delay in the use of EmOC by the midwives and mothers studied. Socio-cultural and familial reasons compel some women to choose to give birth at home and to hesitate seeking professional emergency care for delivery complications. Apprehension about being insulted by physicians, the necessity of protecting their professional integrity in front of patients and an inability to persuade their patients lead to an over-insistence by midwives on completing deliveries at the mothers' homes and a reluctance to refer their patients to hospitals. The low quality and expense of EmOC and the mothers' lack of health insurance also contribute to delays in referral.

Conclusions

Women who choose to give birth at home accept the risk that complications may arise. Training midwives and persuading mothers and significant others who make decisions about the value of referring women to hospitals at the onset of life-threatening complications are central factors to increasing the use of available hospitals. The hospitals must be safe, comfortable and attractive environments for parturition and should give appropriate consideration to the ethical and cultural concerns of the women. Appropriate management of financial and insurance-related issues can help midwives and mothers make a rational decision when complications arise.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Tabatabaie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO: Trends in maternal mortality: 1990-2008. [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241500265_eng.pdf] webciteWorld Health Organization Geneva; 2010.
• [2]Koblinsky M, Conroy C, Kureshy N, Stanton ME, Jessop S: Issues in programming for safe motherhood. [http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACK513.pdf] webcite
• [3]Killewo J, Anwar I, Bashir I, Yunus M, Chakraborty J: Perceived delay in healthcare -seeking for episodes of serious illness and its implications for safe motherhood interventions in rural Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 2006, 24(4):403-412.
• [4]Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman D, Fry D, Lobis S: The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005, 88:181-193.
• [5]Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR: Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery services use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009, 9(34):1-18.
• [6]Thaddeus S, Maine D: Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:1091-1110.
• [7]Murray SF, Pearson S: Maternal referral systems in developing countries: Current knowledge and future research needs. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62:2205-2215.
• [8]Donnay F: Maternal survival in developing countries: what has been done, what can be achieved in the next decade? Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000, 70:89-97.
• [9]IMES: Maternal program index. (Information Management Evaluation System/IMES, Ministry of Health & Medical Education of Iran, Tehran, 2009; The Official Statistics)
• [10]MHO: Maternal health index. (Maternal Health Office/MHO, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, 2011; The Official Statistics
• [11]Teddlie C, Tashakkori A: Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
• [12]UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA: Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services. [http://www.childinfo.org/files/maternal_mortality_finalgui.pdf] webciteUNICEF. New York; 1997.
• [13]UNFPA: Maternal mortality update: a focus on emergency obstetric care. [http://www.unfpa.org/upload/lib_pub_file/201_filename_mmupdate-2002.pdf] webciteUNFPA. New York; 2003.
• [14]AMDD working group on indicators: Averting maternal death and disability program note using UN process indicators to assess needs in emergency obstetric services: Bhutan, Cameroon and Rajestan, India. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002, 78:277-284.
• [15]Admasu K, Haile-Mariam A, Bailey P: Indicators for availability, utilization, and quality of emergency obstetric care in Ethiopia, 2008. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011, 115:101-105.
• [16]Holton JA: The coding process and its challenges. In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Edited by Bryant A, Chatmaz K. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007:265-289.
• [17]Creswell JW: Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
• [18]McGhee G, Marland GR, Atkinson J: Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. J Adv Nurs 2007, 60(3):334-342.
• [19]Lelle U: The development of categories: different approaches in grounded theory. In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Edited by Bryant A, Chatmaz K. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007:191-213.
• [20]Nahar S, Banu M, Nasreen HE: Women-focused development intervention reduces delays in accessing emergency obstetric care in urban slums in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Goffman E: Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin; 1963.
• [22]Baldwin LM, Hutchinson HL, Rosenblatt RA: Professional relationships between midwives and physicians: Collaboration or conflict? Am J Public Health 1992, 82(2):262-264.
• [23]Reiger KM: Domination or mutual Recognition? Professional subjectivity in midwifery and obstetrics. Soc Theory Health 2008, 6:132-147.
• [24]Reiger KM, Lane KL: Working together: collection between midwives and doctors in public hospitals. Aust Health Rev 2009, 33(2):315-324.
• [25]Glei D, Goldman N, Rodriguez G: Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter? Soc Sci Med 2003, 57(12):2447-2463.
• [26]Lindstrom D, Munoz-Franco E: Migration and maternal health services utilization in rural Guatemala. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63(3):706-721.
• [27]Freedman LP, Graham WJ, Smith JM, Ensor T, Fauveav V, Themmen E, Currie S, Agarwal K: Practical lessons from global safe motherhood initiatives: time for a new focus on implementation. The Lancet 2007, 370(9595):1383-1391.
• [28]Makowiecka K, Achadi E, Izati Y, Ronsmans C: Midwifery provision in two district in Indonesia:how well are rural areas served? Health Policy Plan 2008, 23:67-75.
• [29]Rööst M, Jonsson C, Lijestrand J, Essen B: Social differentiation and embodied dispositions: a qualitative study of maternal care-seeking behavior for near-miss morbidity in Bolivia. Reprod Health 2009, 6:13.
• [30]Anderson RM: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995, 36(1):1-10.
• [31]Sunil TS, Rajaram S, Zottarelli LK: Do individual and program factors matter in utilization of maternal care services in rural India. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62:1943-1957.
• [32]Jordan RG, Murphy PA: Risk assessment and risk distortion: Finding the balance. J Midwifery Women’s Health 2009, 54(3):191-200.
• [33]Finucane ML, Holup JL: Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60(7):1603-1612.
• [34]Oltedal S, Moen BE, Klempe H, Rundmo T: Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of cultural theory. [http://www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/Torbjorn.Rundmo/Cultural_theory.pdf] webcite
• [35]Murphy S: Reclaiming a moral identity: stillbirth, stigma and moral mothers. Midwifery 2011. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.06.005
• [36]Kleinman A: Stigma a social, cultural and moral process. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63(6):418-419.
• [37]Yang LH, Kleinman A: Face and the embodiment of stigma in China: the cases of schizophrenia and AIDS. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67(3):398-408.
• [38]Berry NS: Kaqchikel midwives, home births, and emergency obstetric referrals in Guatemala: contextualizing the choice to stay at home. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62:1958-1969.
• [39]Gifford SM: The meaning of lump: a case study of the ambiguities of risk. In Anthropology and epidemiology: interdisciplinary approaches to the study of health and disease. Edited by Janes CR. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Riedel Publishing Company; 1986:213-248.
• [40]Yang LH, Kleinman A, Link BG, Phelan JC, Lee S, Good B: Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64:1524-1535.
• [41]Lindgren H, Hildingsson I, Radestad I: A Swedish interview study: Parent's assessment of risk in home births. Midwifery 2006, 22(1):15-22.
• [42]Schooley J, Mundt C, Wagner P, Fullerton J, O Donnell M: Factors influencing health care-seeking behaviors among Mayan women in Guatemala. Midwifery 2009, 25(4):411-421.
• [43]Bossyns P, Van Lerberghe W: The weakest link: competence and prestige as constraints to referral by isolated nurses in rural Niger. [http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/pdf/1478-4491-2-1.pdf] webciteBMC Human Resources for Health; 2004, 2:1.
• [44]Berry NS: Who's judging the quality of care: Indigenous Maya and the problem of not being attended. Med Anthropol 2008, 27(2):164-189.
• [45]Raven JH, Tolhurst rJ, Tang S, Broek NVD: What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.003
• [46]Navaneetham K, Dharmalingam A: Utilization of maternal health care services in Southern India. Soc Sci Med 2002, 55:1849-1869.