Underage alcohol policies across 50 California cities: an assessment of best practices

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Ryan Treffers¹  Carol Cannon¹  Joel W Grube²  Mallie J Paschall²  Sue Thomas¹ 

[1] Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, P.O. Box 7042, Santa Cruz, CA, 95061, USA;Prevention Research Center, 1995 University Ave, Suite 450, Berkeley, CA, 94704, USA

关键词: Health policy;    Public policy;    Youth drinking;    Alcohol deterrents;    Alcohol laws;    Alcohol policy;   

Others  :  834493
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-597X-7-26

 received in 2011-12-08, accepted in 2012-05-16,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

We pursue two primary goals in this article: (1) to test a methodology and develop a dataset on U.S. local-level alcohol policy ordinances, and (2) to evaluate the presence, comprehensiveness, and stringency of eight local alcohol policies in 50 diverse California cities in relationship to recommended best practices in both public health literature and governmental recommendations to reduce underage drinking.

Methods

Following best practice recommendations from a wide array of authoritative sources, we selected eight local alcohol policy topics (e.g., conditional use permits, responsible beverage service training, social host ordinances, window/billboard advertising ordinances), and determined the presence or absence as well as the stringency (restrictiveness) and comprehensiveness (number of provisions) of each ordinance in each of the 50 cities in 2009. Following the alcohol policy literature, we created scores for each city on each type of ordinance and its associated components. We used these data to evaluate the extent to which recommendations for best practices to reduce underage alcohol use are being followed.

Results

(1) Compiling datasets of local-level alcohol policy laws and their comprehensiveness and stringency is achievable, even absent comprehensive, on-line, or other legal research tools. (2) We find that, with some exceptions, most of the 50 cities do not have high scores for presence, comprehensiveness, or stringency across the eight key policies. Critical policies such as responsible beverage service and deemed approved ordinances are uncommon, and, when present, they are generally neither comprehensive nor stringent. Even within policies that have higher adoption rates, central elements are missing across many or most cities’ ordinances.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the viability of original legal data collection in the U.S. pertaining to local ordinances and of creating quantitative scores for each policy type to reflect comprehensiveness and stringency. Analysis of the resulting dataset reveals that, although the 50 cities have taken important steps to improve public health with regard to underage alcohol use and abuse, there is a great deal more that needs to be done to bring these cities into compliance with best practice recommendations.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Thomas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1 .

【 参考文献 】

• [1]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy people 2010. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; 2005. [http://www.healthypeople.gov/ webcite] Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [2]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Underage Drinking. 2007. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/underagedrinking/ webcite. Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [3]Guide to Community Preventive Services: Preventing excessive alcohol consumption. Last updated: May 16, 2011. http://www.thecommunityguide.org/alcohol/index.html webcite. Accessed on November 30, 2011
• [4]Flewelling RL, Paschall MJ, Ringwalt C: The epidemiology of underage drinking in the United States: An overview. In educing underage drinking: A collective responsibility, background papers [CD-ROM]. Committee on Developing a Strategy to Reduce and Prevent Underage Drinking. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Edited by Bonnie R, O’Connell ME. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2004.
• [5]Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE: Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2010. Institute for Social Research: The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; 2011.
• [6]Hingson RW, Kenkel D: Social, health, and economic consequences of underage drinking. In Reducing Underage Drinking: A Collective Responsibility. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2004.
• [7]Brown SA, Tapert SF, Granholm E, Delis DC: Neurocognitive functioning of adolescents: Effects of protracted alcohol use. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2000, 24(2):164.
• [8]Grant BF, Dawson DA: Age at Onset of Alcohol Use and its Association with DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. Journal of Substance Abuse 1997, 9:103-110.
• [9]National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: About Alcohol Policy. Alcohol Policy Information System (APIS) Web site  . [http://www.alcoholpolicy.niaaa.nih.gov/About_Alcohol_Policy.html webcite]. Accessed May 11, 2012
• [10]Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Sacks JJ, Simon CJ, Brewer RD: Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., 2006. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011, 41:516-524.
• [11]Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation/Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Regulatory strategies for preventing youth access to alcohol: Best practices. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD; 1999. [http://www.udetc.org/documents/accesslaws.pdf webcite]. Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [12]Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation/Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: How to use local regulatory and land use power to reduce underage drinking. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD; 2000. [http://www.udetc.org/documents/regulatory.pdf webcite]. Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [13]National Research Council and Institute of Medicine: Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Committee on Developing a Strategy to Reduce and Prevent Underage Drinking. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2004.
• [14]Grube JW: Preventing alcohol-related problems: public policy strategies. Transportation Research Circular 2005, E-C072:97-126. http://trb.org/publications/circulars/ec072.pdf webcite Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [15]Grube JW, Nygaard P: Alcohol policy and youth drinking: Overview of effective interventions for young people. In Preventing Harmful Substance Use: The Evidence Base For Policy And Practice. Edited by Stockwell T, Gruenewald PJ, Toumbourou J, Loxley W. Wiley, New York; 2001:113-127.
• [16]Grube JW, Nygaard P: Alcohol policy and youth drinking: Overview of effective interventions for young people. In Preventing Harmful Substance Use: The Evidence Base for Policy and Practice. Edited by Stockwell T, Gruenewald P, Toumbourou J, Loxley W. JOHN WILEY & SONS, WEST SUSSEX; 2005.
• [17]Toomey TL, Wagenaar AC: Policy options for prevention: the case of alcohol. Journal of Public Health Policy 1999, 20:193-212.
• [18]DuMouchel W, Williams AF, Zador P: Raising the alcohol purchase age: its effects on fatal motor vehicle crashes in twenty-six states. Journal of Legal Studies 1987, 16:249-266.
• [19]Klepp KI, Schmid LA, Murray DM: Effects of the increased minimum drinking age law on drinking and driving behavior among adolescents. Addiction Research 1996, 4:237-244.
• [20]O’Malley PM, Wagenaar AC: Effects of minimum drinking age laws on alcohol use, related behaviors and traffic crash involvement among American youths: 1976–1987. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1991, 52:478-491.
• [21]Wagenaar AC: Effects of an increase in the legal minimum drinking age. Journal of Health Policy 1981, 2:206-225.
• [22]Yu J, Varone R, Shacket RW: Fifteen-year review of drinking age laws: Preliminary findings of the 1996 New York State Youth Alcohol Survey. Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse, New York; 1997.
• [23]Brand DA, Saisana M, Rynn LA, Pennoni F, Lowenfels AB: Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries. Plos Med 2007., 4
• [24]Paschall MJ, Grube JW, Kypri K: Alcohol control policies and alcohol consumption by youth: a multi-national study. Addiction 2009, 104:1849-1855.
• [25]Fell JC, Fisher DA, Voas RB, Blackman K, Tippetts AS: The relationship of underage drinking laws to reductions in drinking drivers in fatal crashes in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2008, 40:1430-1440.
• [26]Fell JC, Fisher DA, Voas RB, Blackman K, Tippetts AS: The impact of underage drinking laws on alcohol-related fatal crashes of young drivers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2009, 33(5):1-12.
• [27]Ringwalt CL, Paschall MJ: The utility of keg registration laws: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Adolescent Health 2011, 48:106-108.
• [28]Shults RA, Sleet DA, Elder RW, Ryan GW, Sehgal M: Association between state level drinking and driving countermeasures and self reported alcohol impaired driving. Injury Prevention 2002, 8:106-110.
• [29]Kypri K, Voas RB, Langley JD, Stephenson SC, Begg DJ, Tippetts AS, Davie GS: Minimum purchasing age for alcohol and traffic crash injuries among 15- to 19-year-olds in New Zealand. American Journal of Public Health 2006, 96:126-131.
• [30]Cal. Const: Article XX. §22
• [31]Mosher JF, Reynolds B: How to use local regulatory and land use powers to prevent underage drinking. In Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws Series. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquincy Prevention of the U.S. Department of Justice,  ; 1999.
• [32]Forster JL, McGovern PG, Wagenaar AC, Wolfson M, Perry CL, Anstine PS: The ability of young people to purchase alcohol without age identification in northeastern Minnesota, USA. Addiction 1994, 89:699-705.
• [33]Montgomery JM, Foley KL, Wolfson M: Enforcing the minimum drinking age: state, local and agency characteristics associated with compliance checks and Cops in Shops programs. Addiction 2006, 101:223-231.
• [34]Mosher JF, Toomey TL, Good C, Harwood E, Wagenaar AC: State laws mandating or promoting training programs for alcohol servers and establishment managers: an assessment of statutory and administrative procedures. Journal of Public Health Policy 2002, 23:90-113.
• [35]Wagenaar AC, Wolfson M: Deterring sales and provision of alcohol to minors: a study of enforcement in 295 counties in four states. Public Health Reports 1995, 110:419-427.
• [36]Wittman FD, Hilton ME: Use of planning and zoning ordinances to regulate alcohol outlets in California cities. In Advances in Substance Abuse: Behavioral and Biological Research. Edited by Holder Harold D. Jai Press Inc, Greenwich; 1987:337-366.
• [37]Wittman FD: Community control of alcohol and drug risk environments: the California experience. Subst Use Misuse 2007, 42(12-13):1835-49.
• [38]Gorman DM, Labouvie EW, Subaiya AP: Risk of assaultive violence and alcohol availability in New Jersey. American Journal of Public Health 1998, 88:97-100.
• [39]Gruenewald PJ, Ponicki WR, Holder HD: The relationship of outlet densities to alcohol consumption: a time series cross-sectional analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 1993, 17:38-47.
• [40]Gruenewald PJ, Johnson FW, Treno AJ: Outlets, drinking and driving: a multilevel analysis of availability. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2002, 63:460-468.
• [41]Scribner RA, MacKinnon DP, Dwyer JH: Alcohol outlet density and motor vehicle crashes in Los Angeles County cities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1994, 55:447-453.
• [42]Scribner RA, Cohen DA, Kaplan S, Allen SH: Alcohol availability and homicide in New Orleans: conceptual considerations for small area analysis of the effect of alcohol outlet density. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1999, 60:310-316.
• [43]Scribner RA, Cohen DA, Fisher W: Evidence of a structural effect for alcohol outlet density: a multilevel analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2000, 24:188-195.
• [44]Speer PW, Gorman DM, Labouvie EW, Ontkush MA: Violent crime and alcohol availability: relationships in an urban community. Journal of Public Health Policy 1998, 19:303-318.
• [45]Treno AJ, Grube JW, Martin S: Alcohol outlet density as a predictor of youth drinking and driving: a hierarchical analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2003, 27:835-840.
• [46]Rammohan V, Hahn RA, Elder R, et al.: Effects of dram shop liability and enhanced overservice law enforcement initiatives on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms: two Community Guide systematic reviews. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41(3):334-43.
• [47]Hahn RA, Kuzara JL, Elder R, Brewer R, Chattopadhyay S, et al.: Effectiveness of policies restricting hours of alcohol sales in preventing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2010, 39:590-604.
• [48]Middleton JC, Hahn RA, Kuzara JL, Elder R, Brewer R, Chattopadhyay S, et al.: Effectiveness of policies maintaining or restricting days of alcohol sales on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2010, 39:575-589.
• [49]Humphreys DK, Eisner MP: Evaluating a natural experiment in alcohol policy: the Licensing Act (2003) and the requirement for attention to implementation. Criminology & Public Policy 2010, 9:41-68.
• [50]Campbell CA, Hahn RA, Elder R, Brewer R, Chattopadhyay S, et al.: The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2009, 37:556-569.
• [51]Freisthler B, Gruenewald PJ, Treno AJ, Lee J: Evaluating alcohol access and alcohol environment in neighborhood areas. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2003, 27:477-484.
• [52]Paschall MJ, Grube JW, Black C, Flewelling RL, Ringwalt CL, Biglan A: Alcohol Outlet Characteristics and Alcohol Sales to Youth: Results of Alcohol Purchase Surveys in 45 Oregon Communities. Prevention Science 2007, 8:153-159.
• [53]Toomey TL, Wagenaar AC, Gehan JP, Kilian G, Murray D, Perry CL: Project ARM: Alcohol risk management to prevent sales to underage and intoxicated patrons. Health Education and Behavior 2001, 28:186-199.
• [54]Toomey TL, Wagenaar AC: Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: options and research findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2002, 14(suppl):193-205.
• [55]Ker K, Chinnock P: Interventions in the alcohol setting for preventing injuries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008., 3
• [56]Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): Report to Congress: Interim report on the development of a plan for combating underage drinking. , ; 2000. http://www.camy.org/washington/files/samhsareport.pdf webcite Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [57]Mosher JF, Cannon C, Treffers R: Reducing Community Alcohol Problems Associated With Alcohol Sales: The Case Of Deemed Approved Ordinances In California. Ventura County Behavioral Health Department, Ventura CA; 2009. http://venturacountylimits.org/resource_documents/VC_CommAlcProb_1upPress_FNL.pdf webcite. Accessed on April 19, 2012
• [58]Center for the Study of Law and Enforcement Policy, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation: Model Social Host Liability Ordinance with Legal Commentary. Ventura County Behavioral Health Department Publication, Ventura, CA; 2005. [http://www.cslep.org/publications/VCL_MSHLO.pdf]. webcite Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [59]Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth (CAMY): State alcohol adverting laws: Current status and model policies. CAMY, Washington, D.C; 2003. [http://camy.org/research/files/statelaws0403.pdf webcite]. Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [60]Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation: Drinking in America: Myths, realities and prevention policy. , ; 2002. [http://www.udetc.org/documents/Drinking_in_America.pdf webcite]. Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [61]Barry R, Edwards E, Pelletier A, Brewer R, Miller J, Naimi T, Redmond A, Ramsey L: Enhanced enforcement of laws to prevent alcohol sales to underage persons. -- New Hampshire, 1999–2004. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 2004, 53:452-454.
• [62]Dent C, Grube JW, Biglan A: Community level alcohol availability and enforcement of possession laws as predictors of youth drinking. Preventive Medicine 2005, 40:355-362.
• [63]Dills AK: Social host liability for minors and underage drunk-driving accidents. Journal of Health Economics 2010, 29:241-249.
• [64]Forster JL, Murray DM, Wolfson M, Wagenaar AC: Commercial availability of alcohol to young people: results of alcohol purchase attempts. Preventive Medicine 1995, 24:342-347.
• [65]Holder HD, Saltz RF, Grube JW, Voas RB, Gruenewald PJ, Treno AJ: A community prevention trial to reduce alcohol-involved accidental injury and death: Overview. Addiction 1997, 92(suppl. 2):s155-s171.
• [66]Laixuthai A, Chaloupka FJ: Youth alcohol use and public policy. Contemporary Policy Issues 1993, 11:70-81.
• [67]Stout EM, Sloan FA, Liang L, Davies HH: Reducing harmful alcohol-related behaviors: effective regulatory methods. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2000, 61:402-412.
• [68]Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Fell J: Assessing the effectiveness of minimum legal drinking age and zero tolerance laws in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2003, 35:579-587.
• [69]Wagenaar AC, Harwood E, Silianoff C, Toomey T: Measuring public policy: the case of beer keg registration laws. Evaluation and Program Planning 2005, 28:359-367.
• [70]Whetten-Goldstein K, Sloan FA, Stout E, Liang L: Civil liability, criminal law, and other policies and alcohol-related motor vehicle fatalities in the United States: 1984–1995. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2000, 32:723-733.
• [71]Institute for Public Strategies: Adult Accountability for Underage Drinking: the Case for Social Host Laws. Issue Briefing 2003. May 2003 http://www.youthconnectionscoalition.org/pdfs/issuebriefing-adultaccountability.pdf webcite Accessed On May 23, 2012
• [72]Tremper C, Thomas S, Wagenaar AC: Measuring law for public health research. A methodology monograph for the public health law research program (PHLR). Temple University Beasley School of Law  ; 2010.
• [73]Tremper C, Thomas S, Wagenaar AC: Measuring Law for Evaluation Research. Evaluation Review 2010, 34:242-66.
• [74]Center for the Study of Law and Enforcement Policy, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation: Best practices in municipal regulation to reduce alcohol-related harms from licensed alcohol outlets, with model ordinance and bibliography. Ventura County Behavioral Health Department Publication, Ventura, CA; 2007. [http://enjoypb.com/wordpress/wp-admin/documents/batf-ip/cup/ventura-county-limits/vcl_bestpractices_sm_final_rev.pdf webcite.] Accessed on February 16, 2010
• [75]Pelissero JP: Cities, Politics, and Policy: A Comparative Analysis. CQ Press, Washington, D. C.; 2002.
• [76]Chen MJ, Gruenewald PJ, Remer LG: Does alcohol outlet density affect youth access to alcohol? Journal of Adolescent Health 2009, 44(6):582-589.
• [77]GeoLytics Inc: Estimates Premium 2010. [DVD], East Brunswick, NJ; 2010.
• [78]Mothers Against Drunk Driving: Social Host. http://www.madd.org/laws/social-host-1.html webcite Accessed on May 23, 2012