期刊论文详细信息
Reproductive Health
Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women’s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda
Lynn Atuyambe5  James Ntozi1  Gorette Nalwadda4  Alice Reid2  Larissa Jennings3  Allen Kabagenyi1 
[1] Center for Population and Statistics, College of Business and Management Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda;Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK;Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Interventions, 615 N. Wolfe Street, E5038, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda;Department of Community and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Kampala, Uganda
关键词: Uganda;    Qualitative research;    Reproductive health;    Family planning;    Contraception;    Male involvement;   
Others  :  820058
DOI  :  10.1186/1742-4755-11-21
 received in 2013-06-16, accepted in 2014-02-25,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Spousal communication can improve family planning use and continuation. Yet, in countries with high fertility rates and unmet need, men have often been regarded as unsupportive of their partner’s use of family planning methods. This study examines men and women’s perceptions regarding obstacles to men’s support and uptake of modern contraceptives.

Methods

A qualitative study using 18 focus group discussions (FGDs) with purposively selected men aged 15–54 and women aged 15–49 as well as eight key informant interviews (KIIs) with government and community leaders was conducted in 2012 in Bugiri and Mpigi Districts, Uganda. Open-ended question guides were used to explore men and women’s perceptions regarding barriers to men’s involvement in reproductive health. All FGDs and KIIs were recorded, translated, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti.

Results

Five themes were identified as rationale for men’s limited involvement: (i) perceived side effects of female contraceptive methods which disrupt sexual activity, (ii) limited choices of available male contraceptives, including fear and concerns relating to vasectomy, (iii) perceptions that reproductive health was a woman’s domain due to gender norms and traditional family planning communication geared towards women, (iv) preference for large family sizes which are uninhibited by prolonged birth spacing; and (v) concerns that women’s use of contraceptives will lead to extramarital sexual relations. In general, knowledge of effective contraceptive methods was high. However, lack of time and overall limited awareness regarding the specific role of men in reproductive health was also thought to deter men’s meaningful involvement in issues related to fertility regulation.

Conclusion

Decision-making on contraceptive use is the shared responsibility of men and women. Effective development and implementation of male-involvement family planning initiatives should address barriers to men’s supportive participation in reproductive health, including addressing men's negative beliefs regarding contraceptive services.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kabagenyi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140712023432418.pdf 226KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Hartmann M, Gilles K, Shattuck D, Kerner B, Guest G: Changes in couple’s communication as a result of a male-involvement family planning intervention. J Health Commun 2012, 17(7):802-819.
  • [2]Sternberg P, Hubley J: Evaluating men’s involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health program. Health Promo Int 2004, 19:389-396.
  • [3]Bawah A: Spousal communication and family planning behavior in Navrongo: a longitudinal assessment. Stud Fam Plann 2002, 33(2):185-194.
  • [4]Sharan M, Valente T: Spousal communication and family planning adoption: effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspec 2002, 28(1):16-25.
  • [5]Kim Y, Kols A: Counseling and communicating with men to promote family planning in Kenya and Zimbabwe: findings, lessons learned, and programme suggestions. In Programming for male involvement in reproductive health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. [Report of the Meeting of WHO Regional Advisors in Reproductive Health]
  • [6]Yue K, O’Donnel C, Sparks PL: The effect of spousal communication on contraceptive use in Central Terai, Nepal. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 81(3):402-408.
  • [7]Tuloro T, Deressa W, Ali A, Gail DG: The role of men in contraceptive use and fertility preference in Hossana Town, southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev 2009, 20(3):1-8.
  • [8]Dudgeon M, Inhorn M: Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59:1379-1395.
  • [9]Greene ME: Changing women and avoiding men: gender stereotypes and reproductive health programmes. IDS Bull Inst Deve Stud 2000, 31(2):49-59.
  • [10]Soldan V: How family planning ideas are spread with social groups in rural Malawi. Stud Family Plann 2004, 35:275-290.
  • [11]Oyediran K, Isiugo-Abanihe U: Husband-wife communication and couple’s fertility desires among the Yoruba of Nigeria. Afr Pop Stud 2002, 17:61-80.
  • [12]Miller W, Severy L, Pasta D: A framework for modeling fertility motivation in couples. Pop Stud 2004, 58:193-205.
  • [13]Bankole A, Singh S: Couple’s fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the man’s voice. Int Fam Plan Perspec 1998, 24(1):15-24.
  • [14]Biddlecom A, Fapohunda B: Covert contraceptive use: prevalence, motivations, and consequences. Stud Fam Plann 1998, 29:360-372.
  • [15]Mosha I, Ruben R, Kakoko D: Family planning decision, perceptions and gender dynamics among couples in Mwanza, Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:523. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]Westoff CF: Unmet need at the end of the century. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro; 2001. [DHS Comparative Reports No. 1]
  • [17]Shahjahan M, Mumu S, Afroz A, Chowdhury H, Kabir R, Ahmed K: Determinants of male participation in reproductive healthcare services: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health 2013, 10:27. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [18]Stover J, Ross J: How increased contraceptive use has reduced maternal mortality. Matern Child Healt J 2010, 14(5):687-695.
  • [19]Tsui A, McDonald-Mosely R, Burke A: Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev 2010, 32(1):152-174.
  • [20]Yeakey MP, Muntifering CJ, Ramachandran DV, Myint Y, Creanga AA, Tsui AO: How contraceptive use affects birth intervals: results of a literature review. Stud Fam Plann 2009, 40(3):205-214.
  • [21]Rosliza A, Majdah M: Male participation and sharing of responsibility in strengthening family planning activities in Malaysia. Malays J Pub Healt Med 2010, 10(1):23-27.
  • [22]Blake M, Babalola S: Impact of a male motivation campaign on family planning ideation and practice in Guinea. In Field Report No.13. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs; 2002. Retrieved from URL: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACS563.pdf webcite
  • [23]Azmat SK: Mobilizing male opinion leaders’ support for family planning to improve maternal health: a theory-based qualitative study from Pakistan. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011, 4:421-431.
  • [24]Haider S, Todd C, Ahmadzai M, Rahimi S, Azfar P, Morris JL, Miller S: Childbearing and contraceptive decision making amongst Afghan men and women: a qualitative analysis. Health Care Women Int 2009, 30(10):935-953.
  • [25]Save D, Erbaydar T, Kalaca S, Harmanci S, Cali S, Karavus M: Resistance against contraception or medical contraceptive methods: a qualitative study on women and men in Instanbul. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004, 9(2):94-101.
  • [26]Petro-Nustas W, Al-Qutob R: Jordanian men’s attitudes and views of birth-spacing and contraceptive use (A qualitative approach). Health Care Women Int 2002, 23(6–7):516-529.
  • [27]Kaida A, Kipp W, Hessel P, Konde-Lule J: Male participation in family planning: results from a qualitative study in Mpigi District, Uganda. J Biosocial Sci 2005, 37:269-286.
  • [28]Onyango MA, Owoko S, Oguttu M: Factors that influence male involvement in sexual and reproductive health in western Kenya: a qualitative study. Afr J Reprod Health 2010, 14(4 Spec no):32-42.
  • [29]Nalwadda G, Mirembe F, Byamugisha J, Faxelid E: Persitstent high fertility in Uganda: young people recount obstacles and enabling factors to use of contraceptives. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:530. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [30]Ntozi JP, Odwee JO: High fertility in rural Uganda: the role of socioeconomic and biological factors, 3: xi. Kampala, Uganda: Foundation Publishers; 1995:218.
  • [31]Ijadunola MY, Abiona TC, Ijadunola KT, Afolabi OT, Esimai OA, OlaOlorun FM: Male involvement in family planning decision making in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health 2010, 14(4 Spec no):43-50.
  • [32]Population Secretariat (POPSEC): The State of Uganda’s Population Report 2010:. Kampala: Ministry of Finance and Economic Development; 2010. [Population and Sustainable development-Emerging Challenges, Opportunities and prospects] Retrieved from URL: http://www.poposec.org/publications 3 1868272171.pdf webcite
  • [33]Guttmacher Institute 2013: Unintended pregnancy and abortion in Uganda: in brief. Series 2013, 2 2013, 1-8. Retrieved from URL: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/IB-Unintended-Pregnancy-Uganda.pdf webcite
  • [34]Balal A, Nelson E, Marie Stopes International (MSI): MSI Case Studies. MSI in Uganda: Addressing gaps in family planning services. 2009. Retrieved from URL: http://www.mariestopes.org/sites/default/files/MSI_in_Uganda_addressing_gaps_in_family_planning_access_FINAL_0109.pdf webcite
  • [35]Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS): Uganda Population and Housing Census, Vol. 3. Kampala-Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistic; 2002. [Population Size and Distribution]
  • [36]Khan S, Bradley S, Fishel J, Mishra V: Uganda further analysis: unmet need and the demand for family planning in Uganda. Further analysis of the Uganda Demographic and Health Surveys, 1995–2006 2008. Retrieved from URL: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FA60/FA60.pdf webcite
  • [37]Saha K, Singh N, Saha U, Roy J: Male involvement in reproductive health among scheduled tribe: experience from Khairwars of central India. Rur Rem Healt 2007, 7(605):1-9.
  • [38]Campbell M, Nuriye N, Malcolm P: Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2006, 37(Suppl 2):87-98.
  • [39]Marchi NM, de Alvarenga AT, Osis MJ, Bahamondes L: Contraceptive methods with male participation: a perspective of Brazilian couples. Int Nurs Rev 2008, 55(1):103-109.
  • [40]Ramerez-Ferrero E, Lusti-Narasimhan M: The role of men as partners in the prevention of mothers-to-child transmission of HIV and in the promotion of sexual and reproductive health. Reprod Health matters 2012, 20(39):103-109. Retrieved from URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968808012396420 webcite
  • [41]Mullany B, Hindin M, Becker S: Can women’s autonomy impede male involvement in pregnant health in Katmandu, Nepal? Soc Sci Med 2005, 61:1993-2006.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:12次