期刊论文详细信息
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in treatment of rectal adenomas and T1 low-risk carcinomas
Andreas Kirschniak1  Gerhard F Buess1  Claudius Falch1  Christian Stratz3  Jens Burghardt4  Ali Modabber2  Michael Amann3 
[1] Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tübingen University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany;Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany;Department of Cardiology, Bad Krozingen Heart Center, Südring 15, 79189, Bad Krozingen, Germany;Department of Surgery, Freikirchliches Krankenhaus und Poliklinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Germany
关键词: Endoscopic surgery;    Local excision;    Rectal carcinoma;    Rectal adenoma;    Transanal endoscopic microsurgery;   
Others  :  826832
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7819-10-255
 received in 2012-07-07, accepted in 2012-10-31,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as a local therapy option for rectal neoplasms is a tissue-sparing technique that protects the anal sphincter. The present retrospective analysis reports the course of observation after local excision of adenomas and T1 low-risk carcinomas using transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis we examined data on 279 patients for local recurrence. A total of 144 patients had a rectal adenoma (n = 103) or a R0 resection of low-risk T1 carcinomas (n = 41). In this collective, we also examined parameters concerning perioperative management, complications, intraoperative blood loss and duration of hospital stay.

Results

Patients with adenoma were on average 64.9 (range 37 to 90) years old; 83.5% of the adenomas were located 3 to 11 cm from the anocutaneous line. In adenoma patients the recurrence rate was 2.9% for an observation period of 21.8 months. The postoperative course was without any complications in 98.1% of patients.

Patients with T1 low-risk carcinoma were 64.6 (range 30 to 89) years old. In all cases, an R0 resection could be performed. The recurrence rate was 9.8% for an observation period of 34.4 months. In this group the postoperative course was free of complications in 97.6% of patients.

Conclusions

The high efficacy of transanal endoscopic microsurgery ensures minimally invasive treatment of adenomas and low-risk T1 carcinomas with low complication rates and a low rate of therapeutic failure.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Amann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140713103618615.pdf 615KB PDF download
Figure 8. 29KB Image download
Figure 7. 38KB Image download
Figure 6. 37KB Image download
Figure 5. 44KB Image download
Figure 4. 27KB Image download
Figure 3. 34KB Image download
Figure 2. 38KB Image download
Figure 1. 36KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Schmol H-J, Arnold D: Kolorektale Karzinom. In Kompendium Internistische Onkologie. Therpiekonzepte maligner Tumoren Volume 2. 4th edition. Edited by Schmoll H, Höffken K, Possinger . Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag; 2006:3787-3937.
  • [2]Vatn MH, Stalsberg H: The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo – an autopsy study. Cancer 1982, 49:819-825.
  • [3]Williams AR, Balasdoriya BAW, Day DW: Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982, 23:835-842.
  • [4]Mason AY: The place of local resection in the treatment of rectal carcinoma. Proc R Soc Med 1970, 63:1259-1262.
  • [5]Parks AG: A technique for the removal of large villous tumours in the rectum. Proc R Soc Med 1970, 63:89-91.
  • [6]Hon SS, Ng SS, Chiu PW, Chan FK, Ng EK, Li JC, Lee JF, Leung KL: Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus local excision for early rectal neoplasm: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:3923-3927.
  • [7]Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V, Kondo S, Tanaka T, Mizuno N, Hara K, Hijioka S, Imaoka H, Ogura T, Haba S, Yamao K: Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 23:1042-1049.
  • [8]Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu KI, Itoi T, Fujii T: Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:343-352.
  • [9]Buess G, Kipfmüller K, Hack D, Grüssner R, Heintz A, Junginger T: Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 1988, 2:71-75.
  • [10]Cocilovo C, Smith LE, Stahl T, Douglas J: Transanal endoscopic excision of rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:1461-1463.
  • [11]Endreseth BH, Wibe A, Svinsas M, Marvik R, Myrvold HE: Postoperative morbidity and recurrence after local excision of rectal adenomas and rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis 2005, 7:133-137.
  • [12]Langer C, Liersch T, Süss M, Siemer A, Markus P, Ghadimi B, Füzesi L, Becker H: Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003, 18:222-229.
  • [13]Steele RJC, Hershman MJ, Mortensen NJ, Armitage NCM, Scholefield JH: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery – initial experience from three centres in the United Kingdom. Br J Surg 1996, 83:207-210.
  • [14]Häring R, Karavias T, Konradt J: Die posteriore Proktorectotomie. Chirurg 1978, 49:265-271.
  • [15]Schiessel R, Wunderlich M, Karner-Hanusch J: Transanale Excision und Anastomosentechnik. Chirurg. 1986, 57:773-778.
  • [16]Hermanek P, Gall FP: Early (microinvasive) colorectal carcinoma: pathology, diagnosis, surgical treatment. Int J Colorect Dis 1986, 1:79-84.
  • [17]Hermanek P, Marzoli GP (Eds): Lokale Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Verfahren in kurativer Intention. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 1994:7-14.
  • [18]Schildberg FW, Wenk H: Der Posteriore Zugang zum Rectum. Chirurg 1986, 57:779-791.
  • [19]Lin GL, Meng WC, Lau PY, Qiu HZ, Yip AW: Local resection for early rectal tumours: comparative study of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus posterior trans-sphincteric approach (Mason’s operation). Asian J Surg 2006, 29:227-232.
  • [20]Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48:270-284.
  • [21]Floyd ND, Saclarides TJ: Transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of pT1 rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 2006, 49:164-168.
  • [22]Morino M, Allaix ME, Caldart M, Scozzari G, Arezzo A: Risk factors for recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal malignant neoplasm. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:3683-3690.
  • [23]Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss R, Boebel M, Isselhard W, Pichelmaier H: Das System für die transanale endoskopische Rektumoperation. Chirurg 1984, 55:677-680.
  • [24]Mentges B, Buess G: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal tumours. Perspect Colon Rectal Surg 1991, 4:265-279.
  • [25]Ashraf S, Hompes R, Slater A, Lindsey I, Bach S, Mortensen NJ, Cunningham C, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Collaboration: A critical appraisal of endorectal ultrasound and transanal endoscopic microsurgery and decision-making in early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2012, 14:821-826.
  • [26]Zorcolo L, Fantola G, Cabras F, Marongiu L, D’Alia G, Casula G: Preoperative staging of patients with rectal tumours suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): comparison of endorectal ultrasound and histopathologic findings. Surg Endosc 2009, 23:1384-1389.
  • [27]Kneist W, Terzic A, Burghardt J, Heintz A, Junginger T: Selection of patients with rectal tumors for local excision based on preoperative diagnosis. Results of a consecutive evaluation study of 552 patients. Chirurg 2004, 75:168-175.
  • [28]Lee W, Lee D, Choi S, Chun H: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 cancer. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:1283-1287.
  • [29]Salm R, Lampe H, Bustos A, Matern U: Experience with TEM in Germany. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994, 2:251-254.
  • [30]Winde G, Schmid KW, Reers B, Bünte H: Mikrochirurgie (TEM) im prospektiven Vergleich zu konventioneller transanaler Abtragung oder anteriorer Rektumresektion bei Adenomen und oberflächlichen Karzinomen. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1996, 113:265-268.
  • [31]Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, Mashimo Y, Joeng HK, Moriya J, Kuwano H: Comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection with transanal resection for non-invasive rectal tumor: a retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 26:1028-1033.
  • [32]Lezoche G, Guerrieri M, Baldarelli M, Paganini AM, D’Ambrosio G: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for 135 patients with small nonadvanced low rectal cancer (iT1–iT2, iN0): short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:1222-1229.
  • [33]De-Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RA, Meershoek-Klein , Kranenbarg E, De-Boer AC, Bekkering FC, Van-Der Velde CJ: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009, 35:1280-1285.
  • [34]Doornebosch PG, Zeestraten E, de Graaf EJ, Hermsen P, Dawson I, Tollenaar RA, Mourreau H: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer: size matters! Surg Endosc 2012, 26:551-557.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:143次 浏览次数:6次