Optimizing acceleration-based ethograms: the use of variable-time versus fixed-time segmentation

Movement Ecology

Jan A van Gils¹  Kees Oosterbeek²  Theunis Piersma³  Willem Bouten⁴  Roeland A Bom¹ 

[1] Department of Marine Ecology, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), 1790 AB Den Burg, P.O. Box 59, Texel, The Netherlands;SOVON Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Coastal Ecology Team, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands;Chair in Global Flyway Ecology, Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, PO Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands;Computational Geo-Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

关键词: Video annotation;    Tri-axial acceleration;    Supervised classification;    Random forest;    Movement ethogram;    Dromas ardeola;    Crab plover;    Change-point model;    Behaviour classification;   

Others  :  802394
DOI  :  10.1186/2051-3933-2-6

 received in 2014-01-16, accepted in 2014-03-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Animal-borne accelerometers measure body orientation and movement and can thus be used to classify animal behaviour. To univocally and automatically analyse the large volume of data generated, we need classification models. An important step in the process of classification is the segmentation of acceleration data, i.e. the assignment of the boundaries between different behavioural classes in a time series. So far, analysts have worked with fixed-time segments, but this may weaken the strength of the derived classification models because transitions of behaviour do not necessarily coincide with boundaries of the segments. Here we develop random forest automated supervised classification models either built on variable-time segments generated with a so-called ‘change-point model’, or on fixed-time segments, and compare for eight behavioural classes the classification performance. The approach makes use of acceleration data measured in eight free-ranging crab plovers Dromas ardeola.

Results

Useful classification was achieved by both the variable-time and fixed-time approach for flying (89% vs. 91%, respectively), walking (88% vs. 87%) and body care (68% vs. 72%). By using the variable-time segment approach, significant gains in classification performance were obtained for inactive behaviours (95% vs. 92%) and for two major foraging activities, i.e. handling (84% vs. 77%) and searching (78% vs. 67%). Attacking a prey and pecking were never accurately classified by either method.

Conclusion

Acceleration-based behavioural classification can be optimized using a variable-time segmentation approach. After implementing variable-time segments to our sample data, we achieved useful levels of classification performance for almost all behavioural classes. This enables behaviour, including motion, to be set in known spatial contexts, and the measurement of behavioural time-budgets of free-living birds with unprecedented coverage and precision. The methods developed here can be easily adopted in other studies, but we emphasize that for each species and set of questions, the presented string of work steps should be run through.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Bom et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE: Movement ecology special feature: a movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:19052-19059.
• [2]Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP: Trends and perspectives in animal-attached remote sensing. Front Ecol Environ 2005, 3:437-444.
• [3]Rutz C, Hays GC: New frontiers in biologging science. Biol Lett 2009, 5:289-292.
• [4]Nathan R, Spiegel O, Fortmann-Roe S, Harel R, Wikelski M, Getz WM: Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures. J Exp Biol 2012, 215:986-996.
• [5]Bouten W, Baaij EW, Shamoun-Baranes J, Camphuysen CJ: A flexible GPS tracking system for studying bird behaviour at multiple scales. J Ornithol 2013, 154:571-580.
• [6]Shepard ELC, Wilson RP, Quintana F, Laich AG, Liebsch N, Albareda DA, Halsey LG, Gleiss A, Morgan DT, Myers AE, Newman C, Macdonald DW: Identification of animal movement patterns using tri-axial accelerometry. Endang Species Res 2008, 10:47-60.
• [7]Sakamoto KQ, Sato K, Ishizuka M, Watanuki Y, Takahashi A, Daunt F, Wanless S: Can ethograms be automatically generated using body acceleration data from free-ranging birds? PLoS One 2009, 4:e5379.
• [8]Shamoun-Baranes J, Bom R, van Loon EE, Ens BJ, Oosterbeek K, Bouten W: From sensor data to animal behaviour: an oystercatcher example. PLoS One 2012, 7:e37997.
• [9]Ravi N, Dandekar N, Mysore P, Littman ML: Activity recognition from accelerometer data. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2005, 1541-1546.
• [10]Watanabe S, Izawa M, Kato A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Naito Y: A new technique for monitoring the detailed behaviour of terrestrial animals: a case study with the domestic cat. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005, 94:117-131.
• [11]Lagarde F, Guillon M, Dubroca L, Bonnet X, Ben Kaddour K, Slimani T, El mouden EH: Slowness and acceleration: a new method to quantify the activity budget of chelonians. Anim Behav 2008, 75:319-329.
• [12]Martiskainen P, Järvinen M, Skön J-P, Tiirikainen J, Kolehmainen M, Mononen J: Cow behaviour pattern recognition using a three-dimensional accelerometer and support vector machines. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009, 119:32-38.
• [13]Robert B, White BJ, Renter DG, Larson RL: Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle. Comput Electron Agric 2009, 67:80-84.
• [14]Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, Bassett D, Freedson P: An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 2009, 107:1300-1307.
• [15]Nishizawa H, Noda T, Yasuda T, Okuyama J, Arai N, Kobayashi M: Decision tree classification of behaviors in the nesting process of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from tri-axial acceleration data. J Ethol 2013, 31:315-322.
• [16]Ross GJ: cpm: sequential parametric and nonparametric change detection. R package version 1.1. 2013. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cpm webcite
• [17]R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
• [18]Komsta L, Novomestky F: Moments: moments, cumulants, skewness, kurtosis and related tests. R package version 0.13. 2012. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=moments webcite
• [19]Torgo L: Data mining with R: learning with case studies. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2010.
• [20]Liaw A, Wiener M: Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2002, 2:18-22.
• [21]Grünewälder S, Broekhuis F, Macdonald DW, Wilson AM, McNutt JW, Shawe-Taylor J, Hailes S: Movement activity based classification of animal behaviour with an application to data from cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). PLoS One 2012, 7:e49120.
• [22]Halsey LG, Shepard ELC, Quintana F, Gomez Laich A, Green JA, Wilson RP: The relationship between oxygen consumption and body acceleration in a range of species. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2009, 152:197-202.
• [23]Sato K, Daunt F, Watanuki Y, Takahashi A, Wanless S: A new method to quantify prey acquisition in diving seabirds using wing stroke frequency. J Exp Biol 2008, 211:58-65.
• [24]Brown JS: Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1988, 22:37-47.
• [25]Holling CS: Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomolt 1959, 91:385-398.
• [26]van der Meer J, Ens BJ: Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators. J Anim Ecol 1997, 66:846-858.
• [27]van Gils JA, Piersma T: Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition. J Anim Ecol 2004, 73:386-398.
• [28]Moreau M, Siebert S, Buerkert A, Schlecht E: Use of a tri-axial accelerometer for automated recording and classification of goats’ grazing behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009, 119:158-170.
• [29]Campbell HA, Gao L, Bidder OR, Hunter J, Franklin CE: Creating a behavioural classification module for acceleration data: using a captive surrogate for difficult to observe species. J Exp Biol 2013, 216:4501-4506.
• [30]Dwyer RG, Bearhop S, Campbell HA, Bryant DM, Roulin A: Shedding light on light: benefits of anthropogenic illumination to a nocturnally foraging shorebird. J Anim Ecol 2012, 82:478-485.
• [31]van Gils JA, Spaans B, Dekinga A, Piersma T: Foraging in a tidally structured environment by red knots (Calidris canutus): ideal, but not free. Ecology 2006, 87:1189-1202.