Factors that may improve outcomes of early traumatic brain injury care: prospective multicenter study in Austria

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Walter Mauritz²  Helmut Trimmel³  Johannes Leitgeb¹  Marek Majdan⁴  Alexandra Brazinova⁴ 

[1] Department of Traumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Vienna, 1090, Austria;Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Hospital ‘Lorenz Boehler”, Donaueschingenstraße 13, Vienna, 1200, Austria;Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Wiener Neustadt Regional Hospital, Corvinusring 3-5, Wiener Neustadt, 2700, Austria;Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University, Univerzitne nam.1, Trnava, 91843, Slovak Republic

关键词: Comparative effectiveness research;    Emergency care;    Early care;    Prehospital care;    Traumatic brain injury;   

Others  :  1219585
DOI  :  10.1186/s13049-015-0133-z

 received in 2015-02-12, accepted in 2015-07-06,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Existing evidence concerning the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients underlines the importance of appropriate treatment strategies in both prehospital and early in-hospital care. The objectives of this study were to analyze the current state of early TBI care in Austria with its physician-based emergency medical service. Subsequently, identified areas for improvement were transformed into treatment recommendations. The proposed changes were implemented in participating emergency medical services and hospitals and evaluated for their effect.

Methods

14 Austrian centers treating TBI patients participated in the study. Between 2009 and 2012 all patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13 and/or AIS head > 2 within 48 h after the accident, were enrolled. Data were collected in 2 phases: in the first phase data of 408 patients were analyzed. Based on this, a set of recommendations expected to improve outcomes was developed by the study group and implemented in participating centers. Recommendations included time factors (transport to appropriate trauma center, avoiding secondary transfer), adequate treatment strategies (prehospital fluid and airway management, anesthesia, ventilation), monitoring (pulse oximetry and blood pressure monitoring in all patients, capnography in ventilated patients) for prehospital treatment. In the emergency department focus was on first CT scan as soon as possible, short interval between CT scan and surgery and early use of thrombelastometry to optimize coagulation. Following implementation of these recommendations, data on 325 patients were collected and analyzed in phase 2. Final analysis investigated the impact of the recommendations on patient outcomes.

Results

Patients in both data collection phases showed comparable demographic and injury severity characteristics. Treatment changes, especially in terms of fluid management, monitoring and normoventilation as well as thrombelastometry measurements were implemented successfully in phase 2, and led to significant improvement of patient outcomes. Hospital mortality was reduced from 31 % to 23 %. We found a lower rate of unfavorable outcomes, a significant increase in unexpected survivors and more patients with unexpected favorable outcomes as well.

Conclusions

The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the outcomes of TBI patients can be improved with appropriate early care.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Brazinova et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ghajar J. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 2000; 356(9233):923-9.
• [2]Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006; 148(3):255-68.
• [3]Ackery A, Hagel BE, Provvidenza C, Tator CH. An international review of head and spinal cord injuries in alpine skiing and snowboarding. Inj Prev. 2007; 13(6):368-75.
• [4]Auman KM, Kufera JA, Ballesteros MF, Smialek JE, Dischinger PC. Autopsy study of motorcyclist fatalities: the effect of the 1992 Maryland motorcycle helmet use law. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(8):1352-5.
• [5]Bowman SM, Aitken ME, Helmkamp JC, Maham SA, Graham CJ. Impact of helmets on injuries to riders of all-terrain vehicles. Inj Prev. 2009; 15(1):3-7.
• [6]Steudel WI, Cortbus F, Schwerdtfeger K. Epidemiology and prevention of fatal head injuries in Germany--trends and the impact of the reunification. Acta Neurochir. 2005; 147(3):231-42.
• [7]World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2004.
• [8]Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7(8):728-41.
• [9]Stocchetti N, Paterno R, Citerio G, Beretta L, Colombo A. Traumatic brain injury in an aging population. J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29(6):1119-25.
• [10]Bulger EM, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, Moore M, MacKenzie EJ, Jurkovich GJ. Management of severe head injury: institutional variations in care and effect on outcome. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(8):1870-6.
• [11]Fakhry SM, Trask AL, Waller MA, Watts DD. Management of brain-injured patients by an evidence-based medicine protocol improves outcomes and decreases hospital charges. J Trauma. 2004; 56(3):492-9.
• [12]Bullock R, Chesnut RM, Clifton G, Ghajar J, Marion DW, Narayan RK et al.. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Brain Trauma Foundation. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996; 3(2):109-27.
• [13]Rusnak M, Janciak I, Majdan M, Wilbacher I, Mauritz W. Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria VI: effects of guideline-based management. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007; 119(1-2):64-71.
• [14]Gabriel EJ, Ghajar J, Jagoda A, Pons PT, Scalea T, Walters BC. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2002; 19(1):111-74.
• [15]Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir. 1976; 34(1-4):45-55.
• [16]Bull JP. Measures of severity of injury. Injury. 1978; 9(3):184-7.
• [17]Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998; 15(8):573-85.
• [18]Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S et al.. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. Br Med J. 2008; 336(7641):425-9.
• [19]Majdan M, Lingsma HF, Nieboer D, Mauritz W, Rusnak M, Steyerberg EW. Performance of IMPACT, CRASH and Nijmegen models in predicting six months outcome of patients with severe or moderate TBI: an external validation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014; 22(1):68. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Tohme S, Delhumeau C, Zuercher M, Haller G, Walder B. Prehospital risk factors of mortality and impaired consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury: an epidemiological study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014; 22:1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Hartl R, Gerber LM, Iacono L, Ni Q, Lyons K, Ghajar J. Direct transport within an organized state trauma system reduces mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2006; 60(6):1250-6.
• [22]Weninger P, Mauritz W, Fridrich P, Spitaler R, Figl M, Kern B et al.. Emergency room management of patients with blunt major trauma: evaluation of the multislice computed tomography protocol exemplified by an urban trauma center. J Trauma. 2007; 62(3):584-91.
• [23]Fung Kon Jin PH, Penning N, Joosse P, Hijdra AH, Bouma GJ, Ponsen KJ et al.. The effect of the introduction of the Amsterdam Trauma Workflow Concept on mortality and functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2008; 25(8):1003-9.
• [24]Helm M, Schuster R, Hauke J, Lampl L. Tight control of prehospital ventilation by capnography in major trauma victims. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 90(3):327-32.
• [25]Warner KJ, Cuschieri J, Garland B, Carlbom D, Baker D, Copass MK et al.. The utility of early end-tidal capnography in monitoring ventilation status after severe injury. J Trauma. 2009; 66(1):26-31.
• [26]Myburgh J, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Norton R, Bishop N et al.. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(9):874-84.
• [27]Cooper DJ, Myles PS, McDermott FT, Murray LJ, Laidlaw J, Cooper G et al.. Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 291(11):1350-7.
• [28]Lier H, Krep H, Schochl H. Coagulation management in the treatment of multiple trauma. Anaesthesist. 2009; 58(10):1010-26.
• [29]Schochl H, Nienaber U, Hofer G, Voelckel W, Jambor C, Scharbert G et al.. Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate. Crit Care. 2010; 14(2):R55. BioMed Central Full Text
• [30]Schochl H, Solomon C, Traintinger S, Nienaber U, Tacacs-Tolnai A, Windhofer C et al.. Thromboelastometric (ROTEM) findings in patients suffering from isolated severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011; 28(10):2033-41.
• [31]Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, Cottingham R, El-Sayed H, Farrell B et al.. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months. Lancet. 2005; 365(9475):1957-9.
• [32]Masson F, Thicoipe M, Aye P, Mokni T, Senjean P, Schmitt V et al.. Epidemiology of severe brain injuries: a prospective population-based study. J Trauma. 2001; 51(3):481-9.
• [33]Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14(3):187-96.