Retrospective diagnosis of a famous historical figure: ontological, epistemic, and ethical considerations

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine

Osamu Muramoto¹ 

[1] Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd. UHN-86, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA

关键词: Frédéric Chopin;    Plato;    Socrates;    Pathography;    Epistemology in medicine;    Ontology of disease;    Medical ethics;    History of medicine;    Philosophy of medicine;    Retrospective diagnosis;   

Others  :  816358
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-5341-9-10

 received in 2013-12-16, accepted in 2014-05-26,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

The aim of this essay is to elaborate philosophical and ethical underpinnings of posthumous diagnosis of famous historical figures based on literary and artistic products, or commonly called retrospective diagnosis. It discusses ontological and epistemic challenges raised in the humanities and social sciences, and attempts to systematically reply to their criticisms from the viewpoint of clinical medicine, philosophy of medicine, particularly the ontology of disease and the epistemology of diagnosis, and medical ethics. The ontological challenge focuses on the doubt about the persistence of a disease over historical time, whereas the epistemic challenge disputes the inaccessibility of scientific verification of a diagnosis in the past. I argue that the critics are in error in conflating the taxonomy of disease (nosology) and the act of diagnosing a patient. Medical diagnosis is fundamentally a hypothesis-construction and an explanatory device that can be generated under various degrees of uncertainty and limited amount of information. It is not an apodictic judgment (true or false) as the critics presuppose, but a probabilistic (Bayesian) judgment with varying degrees of plausibility under uncertainty. In order to avoid this confusion, I propose that retrospective diagnosis of a historical figure be syndromic without identifying underlying disease, unless there is justifiable reason for such specification. Moreover it should be evaluated not only from the viewpoint of medical science but also in a larger context of the scholarship of the humanities and social sciences by its overall plausibility and consistency. On the other hand, I will endorse their concerns regarding the ethics and professionalism of retrospective diagnosis, and call for the need for situating such a diagnosis in an interdisciplinary scope and the context of the scholarship of the historical figure. I will then enumerate several important caveats for interdisciplinary retrospective diagnosis using an example of the retrospective diagnosis of Socrates for his life-long intermittent neurologic symptoms. Finally, I will situate the present argument in a larger context of the major debate among the historians of medicine and paleopathologists, and discuss the similarities and differences.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Muramoto; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kean S: Retrodiagnoses: Investigating the ills of long-dead celebrities. Science 2012, 337:30-31.
• [2]Byard R, Jensen L: Retrospective diagnoses of conditions affecting historical individuals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2008, 4:70.
• [3]Karenberg A: Retrospective diagnosis: use and abuse in medical historiography. Prague Med Rep 2009, 110:140-145.
• [4]Karenberg A, Moog FP: Next emperor, please! No end to retrospective diagnostics. J Hist Neurosci 2004, 13:143-149.
• [5]Leven KH: ‘At times these ancient facts seem to lie before me like a patient on a hospital bed’-Retrospective diagnosis and ancient medical history. In Magic and Rationality in Ancient Near Eastern and Graeco-Roman Medicine. Edited by Horstmanshoff HFJ, Stol M. Leiden: Brill; 2004:369-386.
• [6]York GK, Steinberg DA: Commentary. The diseases of Alexander the Great. J Hist Neurosci 2004, 13:153-156.
• [7]Kubba AK, Young M: The long suffering of Frederic Chopin. Chest 1998, 113:210-216.
• [8]Bradford DT: Neuropathography: origins and methodology. Percept Mot Skills 2006, 103:471-485.
• [9]Hilken S, Bormuth M, Schmidt-Dgenhard M: Psychiatrische Anfänge der Pathographie. In Kunst und Krankheit: Studien zur Pathographie. Edited by Bormuth M, Podoll K, Spitzer C. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag; 2007:11-26.
• [10]Hawkins AH: Pathography: patient narratives of illness. West J Med 1999, 171:127-129.
• [11]Dubos R, Dubos J: The White Plague: Tuberculosis, Man, and Society. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1987.
• [12]Roberts C: Re-emerging infections: developments in bioarchaeological contributions to understanding tuberculosis today. In A Companion to Paleopathology. Edited by Grauer AL. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2012:1012-1069.
• [13]Mays S: The relationship between paleopathology and the clinical sciences. In A Companion to Paleopathology. Edited by Grauer AL. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2012:687-744.
• [14]Haensch S, Bianucci R, Signoli M, Rajerison M, Schultz M, Kacki S, Vermunt M, Weston DA, Hurst D, Achtman M, Carniel E, Bramanti B: Distinct clones of Yersinia pestis caused the black death. PLoS Pathog 2010, 6(10):e1001134. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001134
• [15]Mitchell PD: Integrating historical sources with paleopathology. In A Companion to Paleopathology. Edited by Grauer AL. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2012:745-776.
• [16]Murphy M: Realism about the past. In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Edited by Tucker A. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2009:181-188.
• [17]Simon JR: Medical ontology. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 16. Edited by Gifford F. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011:65-114. [Philosophy of Medicine]
• [18]Murphy EA: The Logic of Medicine. 2nd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.
• [19]Wilson A: On the history of disease concepts: the case of pleurisy. Hist Sci 2000, 38:271-319.
• [20]Cunningham A: Identifying disease in the past: cutting the Gordian knot. Asclepio 2002, 54:13-34.
• [21]Shorter E: The history of the doctor-patient relationship. In Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. Edited by Bynum WF, Porter R. New York: Routledge; 1997:783-800.
• [22]Nicolson M: The art of diagnosis: medicine and the five senses. In Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. Edited by Bynum WF, Porter R. New York: Routledge; 1997:801-825.
• [23]Nardone DA: Collecting and analyzing data: doing and thinking. In Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. Edited by Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW. Boston: Butterworths; 1990:22-28.
• [24]Hajek A, Hartmann S, Dancy J, Sosa E: Bayesian epistemology. In A Companion to Epistemology. Second edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2010:93-105.
• [25]Chiong W: Diagnosing and defining disease. In Health, Disease, and Illness: Concepts in Medicine. Edited by Caplan AL, McCartney JJ, Sisti DA. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press; 2004:128-131.
• [26]Temkin O: The Falling Sickness: A History of Epilepsy from the Greeks to the Beginning of Modern Neurology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1994.
• [27]Bynum WF: Nosology. In Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. Edited by Bynum WF, Porter R. New York: Routledge; 1997:334-356.
• [28]Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Seymour C: Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. BMJ 1975, 2(5969):486-489.
• [29]Day M, Radick G: Historiographic evidence and confirmation. In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Edited by Tucker A. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2009:87-97.
• [30]Bäzner H, Hennerici MG: Painting after right-hemisphere stroke – case studies of professional artists. In Neurological Disorders in Famous Artists – Part 2. Edited by Bogousslavsky J, Hennerici MG. Basel: Karger; 2007:1-13.
• [31]McKie R: Row over plan to DNA test Chopin’s heart. 2008. http://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/jul/27/classicalmusicandopera.genetics webcite [Accessed 13 December, 2013]
• [32]Callahan JC: On harming the dead. Ethics 1987, 97:341-352.
• [33]Luper S: Posthumous harm. Am Philos Q 2004, 41:63-72.
• [34]AFP: In Poland, Chopin’s heart may hold secret of his death. 2008. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hlgSnrgcPV8f8GewQyE3O-QHRlzA webcite [Accessed 13 December 2013]
• [35]Muramoto O, Englert WG: Socrates and temporal lobe epilepsy: a pathographic diagnosis 2,400 years later. Epilepsia 2006, 47:652-654.
• [36]Cooper JM (Ed): Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co; 1997.
• [37]McPherran ML: The Religion of Socrates. Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park, PA; 1996.
• [38]Nussbaum M: Commentary on Edmunds, Volume 1. 1986, 231-240. [Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy]
• [39]Vlastos G, Brickhouse TC, McPherran ML, Smith ND: Socrates and his Daimonion. Correspondence among the authors. In Reason and Religion in Socratic Philosophy. Edited by Smith ND, Woodruff PB. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:176-204.
• [40]Bussanich J: Socrates and religious experience. In A Companion to Socrates. Edited by Ahbel-Rappe S, Kamtekar R. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006:200-213.
• [41]Russell B: A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1945/1977.
• [42]Joyal MA: ‘The Divine sign did not oppose me’: A problem in Plato’s Apology? In Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Edited by Joyal MA. Brookfield: Ashgate; 1997:43-58.
• [43]Arrizabalaga J: Problematizing retrospective diagnosis in the history of disease. Asclepio 2002, 54:51-70.
• [44]Mitchell PD: Retrospective diagnosis and the use of historical texts for investigating disease in the past. Int J Paleopathol 2011, 1:81-88.