Establishment and implementation of an effective rule for the interpretation of computed tomography scans by emergency physicians in blunt trauma

World Journal of Emergency Surgery

Choichiro Tase¹  Jiro Shimada¹  Arifumi Hasegawa¹  Yasuhiko Tsukada¹  Chiaki Nemoto¹  Tsuyoshi Suzuki¹  Yukihiro Ikegami¹ 

[1] Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan

关键词: Misinterpretation;    Rule;    Computed tomography;    Blunt trauma;   

Others  :  1146317
DOI  :  10.1186/1749-7922-9-40

 received in 2014-02-12, accepted in 2014-06-17,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Computed tomography (CT) can detect subtle organ injury and is applicable to many body regions. However, its interpretation requires significant skill. In our hospital, emergency physicians (EPs) must interpret emergency CT scans and formulate a plan for managing most trauma cases. CT misinterpretation should be avoided, but we were initially unable to completely accomplish this. In this study, we proposed and implemented a precautionary rule for our EPs to prevent misinterpretation of CT scans in blunt trauma cases.

Methods

We established a simple precautionary rule, which advises EPs to interpret CT scans with particular care when a complicated injury is suspected per the following criteria: 1) unstable physiological condition; 2) suspicion of injuries in multiple regions of the body (e.g., brain injury plus abdominal injury); 3) high energy injury mechanism; and 4) requirement for rapid movement to other rooms for invasive treatment. If a patient meets at least one of these criteria, the EP should exercise the precautions laid out in our newly established rule when interpreting the CT scan. Additionally, our rule specifies that the EP should request real-time interpretation by a radiologist in difficult cases. We compared the accuracy of EPs’ interpretations and resulting patient outcomes in blunt trauma cases before (January 2011, June 2012) and after (July 2012, January 2013) introduction of the rule to evaluate its efficacy.

Results

Before the rule’s introduction, emergency CT was performed 1606 times for 365 patients. We identified 44 cases (2.7%) of minor misinterpretation and 40 (2.5%) of major misinterpretation. After introduction, CT was performed 820 times for 177 patients. We identified 10 cases (1.2%) of minor misinterpretation and two (0.2%) of major misinterpretation. Real-time support by a radiologist was requested 104 times (12.7% of all cases) and was effective in preventing misinterpretation in every case. Our rule decreased both minor and major misinterpretations in a statistically significant manner. In particular, it conspicuously decreased major misinterpretations.

Conclusion

Our rule was easy to practice and effective in preventing EPs from missing major organ injuries. We would like to propose further large-scale multi-center trials to corroborate these results.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ikegami et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Soto JA, Anderson SW: Multidetector CT of blunt abdominal trauma. Radiology 2012, 265:678-693.
• [2]Merchant N, Scalea T, Stein D: Can CT angiography replace conventional bi-planar angiography in the management of severe scapulothoracic dissociation injuries? Am Surg 2012, 78:875-882.
• [3]Flohr TG, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Petersilka M, Schmidt B, McCollough CH: Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a dual source CT scanner. Med Phys 2008, 35:5882-5897.
• [4]Wing VW, Federle MP, Morris JA Jr, Jeffrey RB, Bluth R: The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma. AJR 1985, 145:1191-1194.
• [5]Huber-Wagner S, Lefering R, Qvick LM, Körner M, Kay MV, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser M, Mutschler W, Kanz KG, Working Group on Polytrauma of the German Trauma Society: Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicenter study. Lancet 2009, 373:1455-1461.
• [6]O’Leary MR, Smith M, Olmsted WW, Curtis DJ: Physician assessments of practice pattern in emergency department radiograph interpretation. Ann Emerg Med 1988, 17:1019-1023.
• [7]James MR, Bracegirdle A, Yates DW: X-ray reporting in accident and emergency departments-an area for improvements in efficiency. Arch Emerg Med 1991, 8:266-270.
• [8]Tienq N, Grinberg D, Li SF: Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents. Am J Emerg Med 2007, 25:45-48.
• [9]Chung JH, Strigel RM, Chew AR, Albrecht E, Gunn ML: Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center: an analysis and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2009, 16:1155-1160.
• [10]Vorhies RW, Harrison PB, Smith RS, Helmer SD: Senior surgical residents can accurately interpret trauma radiographs. Am Surg 2002, 68:221-226.
• [11]Tien HC, Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB, Gelberg J, Spencer F, Caldwell C, Brenneman FD: Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 2007, 62:151-156.
• [12]Broder J, Warshauer DM: Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2005–2006. Emerg Radiol 2006, 13:25-30.
• [13]Lee J, Pawa KS, Kirschner J, Pawa S, Wiener DE, Newman DH, Shah K: Computed tomography use in the adult emergency department of an academic urban hospital from 2001 to 2007. Ann Emerg Med 2010, 56:591-596.
• [14]Smith CB, Barrett TW, Berger CL, Berger CL, Zhou C, Thurman RJ, Wrenn KD: Prediction of blunt traumatic injury in high-acuity patients: bedside examination vs. computed tomography. Am J Emerg Med 2011, 29:1-10.
• [15]Hunter TB, Krupinski EA, Hunt KR, Erly WK: Emergency department coverage by academic department of radiology. Acad Radiol 2000, 7:165-170.
• [16]Torreggiani WC, Nicolaou S, Lyburn ID, Harris AC, Buckley AR: Emergency radiology in Canada: a national survey. Can Assoc Radiol J 2002, 53:160-167.
• [17]Petinaux B, Bhat R, Boniface K, Aristizabal J: Accuracy of radiographic readings in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2011, 29:18-25.
• [18]Gray HR: Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J 2001, 18:263-269.
• [19]Keijzers G, Sithirasenan V: The effect of a chest imaging lecture on emergency department doctors’ ability to interpret chest CT images: a randomized study. Europ J Emerg Med 2012, 19:40-45.
• [20]Saketkhoo DD, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Forman HP: Emergency department image interpretation services at private community hospitals. Radiology 2004, 231:190-197.