Barriers and opportunities in assessing calls to emergency medical communication centre - a qualitative study

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Ann-Charlotte Falk²  Maaret Castrèn⁴  Katarina Bohm⁴  Kristiina Heikkilä³  Veronica Lindström¹ 

[1] Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset and Academic EMS, Stockholm, Sweden;Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden;Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linneaus University, Kalmar, Sweden;Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education and Section of Emergency Medicine Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden

关键词: Assessment;    Registered nurse;    Emergency medical dispatcher;    Dispatch centre;    Emergency medical communication centre;    Emergency medical services;   

Others  :  1151691
DOI  :  10.1186/s13049-014-0061-3

 received in 2014-05-11, accepted in 2014-10-15,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Previous studies have described the difficulties and the complexity of assessing an emergency call, and assessment protocols intended to support the emergency medical dispatcher¿s (EMD) assessment have been developed and evaluated in recent years. At present, the EMD identifies about 50-70 % of patients suffering from cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction or stroke. The previous research has primarily been focused on specific conditions, and it is still unclear whether there are any overall factors that may influence the assessment of the call to the emergency medical communication centre (EMCC).

Aim

The aim of the study was to identify overall factors influencing the registered nurses¿ (RNs) assessment of calls to the EMCC.

Method

A qualitative study design was used; a purposeful selection of calls to the EMCC was analysed by content analysis.

Results

One hundred calls to the EMCC were analysed. Barriers and opportunities related to the RN or the caller were identified as the main factors influencing the RN¿s assessment of calls to the EMCC. The opportunities appeared in the callers¿ symptom description and the communication strategies used by the RN. The barriers appeared in callers¿ descriptions of unclear symptoms, paradoxes and the RN¿s lack of communication strategies during the call.

Conclusion

Barriers in assessing the call to the EMCC were associated with contradictory information, the absence of a primary problem, or the structure of the call. Opportunities were associated with a clear symptom description that was also repeated, and the RN¿s use of different communication strategies such as closed loop communication.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Lindström et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Castrén M, Karlsten R, Lippert F, Christensen EF, Bovim E, Kvam AM, Robertson-Steel I, Overton J, Kraft T, Engerstrom L, Garcia-Castrill Riego L: Recommended guidelines for reporting on emergency medical dispatch when conducting research in emergency medicine: the Utstein style. Resuscitation 2008, 79(2):193-197.
• [2]Bohm K, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, Biber B, Engerstrom L, Svensson L: Dispatcher-assisted telephone-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an underused lifesaving system. Eur J Emerg Med 2007, 14(5):256-259.
• [3]Berdowski J, Beekhuis F, Zwinderman AH, Tijssen JG, Koster RW: Importance of the first link: description and recognition of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an emergency call. Circulation 2009, 119(15):2096-2102.
• [4]Fourny M, Lucas AS, Belle L, Debaty G, Casez P, Bouvaist H, Francois P, Vanzetto G, Labarere J: Inappropriate dispatcher decision for emergency medical service users with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 2011, 29(1):37-42.
• [5]Ramanujam P, Guluma KZ, Castillo EM, Chacon M, Jensen MB, Patel E, Linnick W, Dunford JV: Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics¿San Diego experience. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008, 12(3):307-313.
• [6]Tonje L, Elisabeth S, Lars W: Handling of drug-related emergencies: an evaluation of emergency medical dispatch. Eur J Emerg Med 2009, 16(1):37-42.
• [7]Calle P, Vanhaute O, Lagaert L, Houbrechts H, Buylaert W: The `early access¿ link in the chain of survival for cardiac arrest victims in Ghent. Belgium Eur J Emerg Med 1994, 1(3):145-148.
• [8]Wahlberg AC, Cedersund E, Wredling R: Factors and circumstances related to complaints in emergency medical dispatching in Sweden: an exploratory study. Eur J Emerg Med 2003, 10(4):272-278.
• [9]Forslund K, Kihlgren A, Kihlgren M: Operators¿ experiences of emergency calls. J Telemed Telecare 2004, 10(5):290-297.
• [10]Grow RW, Sztajnkrycer MD, Moore BR: Language barriers as a reported cause of prehospital care delay in Minnesota. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008, 12(1):76-79.
• [11]Bang A, Herlitz J, Holmberg S: Possibilities of implementing dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the community. An evaluation of 99 consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Resuscitation 2000, 44(1):19-26.
• [12][http://www.emergencydispatch.org/ResourcesEDS] webcite Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS). In []
• [13]The Leardal Foundation for Acute Medicine; Swedish Index to Emergency Medical Assistance. Laerdal A/S, Stavanger, Norway; 2001.
• [14]Ambulance and emergency care services: A handbook for drawing up an alarm procedures (in Swedish). Social-och-Hälsovårdsministeriet, Helsinki, Finland; 2006.
• [15][http://www.sosalarm.se] webcite SOS Alarm, information Swedish dispatch organization (in Swedish). In []
• [16][http://www.1177.se/Stockholm/Regler-och-rattigheter/Liggande-persontransport/] webcite 1177 Health Care Guide, Stockholm County Council (in Swedish). In []
• [17]Lindstrom V, Karlsten R, Falk AC, Castren M: Feasibility of a computer-assisted feedback system between dispatch centre and ambulances. Eur J Emerg Med 2011, 18(3):143-147.
• [18]Patton M: Qualitative researche & evaluation methods. Sage, London; 2002.
• [19]Stålhandske B: Dispatching Prehospital emergency care (in Swedish). In Prehospital emergency Care. Sweden Liber, Stockholm; 2009.
• [20]Elo S, Kyngas H: The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008, 62(1):107-115.
• [21]Clawson JJ, Sinclair R: The emotional content and cooperation score in emergency medical dispatching. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001, 5(1):29-35.
• [22]Salas E, Wilson KA, Murphy CE, King H, Salisbury M: Communicating, coordinating, and cooperating when lives depend on it: tips for teamwork. Joint Commission Resour 2008, 34(6):333-341.
• [23]Pettinari CJ, Jessopp L: ¿Your ears become your eyes¿: managing the absence of visibility in NHS Direct. J Adv Nurs 2001, 36(5):668-675.
• [24]Salk ED, Schriger DL, Hubbell KA, Schwartz BL: Effect of visual cues, vital signs, and protocols on triage: a prospective randomized crossover trial. Ann Emerg Med 1998, 32(6):655-664.
• [25]Nemitz B: Advantages and limitations of medical dispatching: the French view. Eur J Emerg Med 1995, 2(3):153-159.
• [26]Hjalte L, Suserud BO, Herlitz J, Karlberg I: Initial emergency medical dispatching and prehospital needs assessment: a prospective study of the Swedish ambulance service. Eur J Emerg Med 2007, 14(3):134-141.
• [27]Neely KW, Norton RL, Schmidt TA: The strength of specific EMS dispatcher questions for identifying patients with important clinical field findings. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000, 4(4):322-326.
• [28]Downe-Wamboldt B: Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Int 1992, 13(3):313-321.