Health care providers’ opinions on abortion: a study for the implementation of the legal abortion public policy in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina

Reproductive Health

Agustina Ramón Michel¹  Mariana Romero²  Silvina Ramos¹ 

[1] Center for the Study of State and Society (CEDES), Sánchez de Bustamante 27, 1173 Buenos Aires, Argentina;Center for the Study of State and Society (CEDES) and CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council), Sánchez de Bustamante 27, 1173 Buenos Aires, Argentina

关键词: Argentina;    Health care providers;    Opinions;    Operations research;    Abortion;   

Others  :  1132338
DOI  :  10.1186/1742-4755-11-72

 received in 2014-03-30, accepted in 2014-09-17,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In Argentina, abortion has been decriminalized under certain circumstances since the enactment of the Penal Code in 1922. Nevertheless, access to abortion under this regulatory framework has been extremely limited in spite of some recent changes. This article reports the findings of the first phase of an operations research study conducted in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina, regarding the implementation of the local legal and safe abortion access policy.

Methods

The project combined research and training to generate a virtuous circle of knowledge production, decision-making, and the fostering of an informed healthcare policy. The project used a pre-post design of three phases: baseline, intervention, and evaluation. It was conducted in two public hospitals. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire (n = 157) and semi-structured interviews (n = 27) were applied to gather information about tacit knowledge about the regulatory framework; personal opinions regarding abortion and its decriminalization; opinions on the requirements needed to carry out legal abortions; and service’s responses to women in need of an abortion.

Results

Firstly, a fairly high percentage of health care providers lack accurate information on current legal framework. This deficit goes side by side with a restrictive understanding of both health and rape indications. Secondly, while a great majority of health care providers support abortion under the circumstances consider in the Penal Code, most of them are reluctant towards unrestricted access to abortion. Thirdly, health care providers’ willingness to perform abortions is noticeably low given that only half of them are ready to perform an abortion when a woman’s life is at risk. Willingness is even lower for each of the other current legal indications.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that there are important challenges for the implementation of a legal abortion policy. Results of the study call for specific strategies targeting health care providers in order to better inform about current legal abortion regulations and to sensitize them about abortion social determinants. The interpretation of the current legal framework needs to be broadened in order to reflect a comprehensive view of the health indication, and stereotypes regarding women’s sexuality and abortion decisions need to be dismantled.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ramos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES): Morbilidad Materna Severa en la Argentina: Prevención y Calidad de la Atención para Reducir la Incidencia y las Consecuencias Adversas del Aborto. Buenos Aires: Comisión Nacional Salud Investiga, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación; 2005.
• [2]Pantelides E, Mario S: Estimación de la magnitud del aborto inducido en la Argentina. Notas de Población (CEPAL) 2009, 87:95-120.
• [3]Observatorio de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva (OSSyR): Sala de Situación 3. http://www.ossyr.org.ar/sala/sala_tres.asp webcite (accesed July 15 2014)
• [4]World Health Organization (WHO): Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
• [5]Ministerio de Salud de la Nación: Estadísticas Vitales-Información Básica- 2012. Serie 5 Num. 56. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación; 2013. http://www.deis.gov.ar/Publicaciones/Archivos/Serie5Nro56.pdf webcite (Accesed July 14 2014)
• [6]Observatorio de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva (OSSyR). La Reducción de la Mortalidad Materna está Estancada. http://www.muertematernaenargentina.org/ webcite (Accesed July 14 2014)
• [7]Cavallo M, Amette R: Aborto no punible. A cuatro meses de “F.,A.L. s/medida autosatisfactiva”. ¿Qué obtuvimos y qué nos queda por obtener? In Una Cuestión de Derechos Edited by Asociación por los Derechos Civiles (ADC). 2012. [No. 2. 1er semestre de 2012] http://www.cuestiondederechos.org.ar/pdf/numero2/09-Aborto-no-punible.pdf webcite (accessed September 23 2014)
• [8]Ramón Michel A: El fenómeno de inaccesibilidad al aborto no punible. In Aborto y Justicia Reproductiva. Edited by Bergallo P. Buenos Aires: Editores del Puerto; 2011:137-200.
• [9]Carbajal M: El aborto en Debate: Aportes para una Discusión Pendiente. Buenos Aires: Paidós; 2009.
• [10]Fisher A, Laing J, Stoeckel J, Townsend J: Handbook for Family Planning Operations Research Design. New York: Population Council; 1998.
• [11]Fisher A, Foreit J: Designing HIV/AIDS Intervention Studies: an Operations Research Handbook. New York: Population Council; 2002.
• [12]Brandeau M, Sainfort F, Pierskalla W: Operations Research and Health Care: a Handbook of Methods and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 2004.
• [13]International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF): Aborto Legal: Regulaciones Sanitarias Comparadas. New York: IPPF/RHO; 2007.
• [14]Collumbien M, Busza J, Cleland J, Campbell O: Social Science Methods for Research on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
• [15]Bart Johnston H, Schurmann A, Oliveras E, Akhter H: Scaled up and marginalized: a review of Bangladesh’s menstrual regulation. In Social Determinants Approaches to Public Health: from Concept to Practice. Edited by Blas E, Sommerfeld J, Sivasanka A. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011:9-24.
• [16]Panisset U, Koehlmoos T, Alkhatib A, Pantoja T, Singh P, Kengey-Kayondo J: Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making. BMC Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 12(1):1.
• [17]Gilson L: Health Policy and Systems Research: a Methodology Reader. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. World Health Organization; 2012.
• [18]Simmons R, Ghiron L, Fajans P: Scaling up Health Service Delivery: From Pilot Innovations to Policies and Programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
• [19]Madon T, Kupfer L, Hofman K, Glass R: Public health. Implementation science. Science 2007, 318(5857):1728-1729.
• [20]Campbell D, Stanley J, Gage N: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1963.
• [21]Ramos S, Viladrich A: Abortos Hospitalizados Entrada y Salida de Emergencia. CEDES: Buenos Aires; 1993.
• [22]Cruess S, Cruess R: Professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 449:170-176.
• [23]May C: Agency and implementation: understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Soc Sci Med 2013, 78:26-33.
• [24]Silva M, Billings D, García S, Lara D: Physicians’ agreement with and willingness to provide abortion services in the case of pregnancy from rape in Mexico. Contraception 2009, 79:56-64.
• [25]Luker K: Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.
• [26]Kane G: Abortion law reform in Latin America: lessons for advocacy. Gender Dev 2008, 16(2):361-375.
• [27]Shiffman J, Smith S: Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet 2007, 370(9595):1370-1379.
• [28]Joffe C, Weitz T, Stacey C: Uneasy allies: pro-choice physicians, feminist health activists and the struggle for abortion rights. Sociol Health Illn 2004, 26(6):775-796.
• [29]Aries N: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the evolution of abortion policy, 1951–1973: The Politics of Science. Am J Public Health 2003, 93(11):1810-1819.
• [30]Gasman N, Blandon M, Crane B: Abortion, social inequity, and women’s health: obstetrician-gynecologists as agents of change. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006, 94(3):310-316.
• [31]Petracci M: Sondeos y políticas: la opinión pública sobre derechos sexuales y reproductivos en la Argentina, 2003–2006. In Opinión Pública. Una Mirada Desde América Latina. Edited by Braun M, Straw C. Buenos Aires: Emecé; 2009:429-441.
• [32]García López S, Lara Pineda D, Goldman L: Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas de los médicos mexicanos sobre el aborto: resultados de una encuesta nacional. Gac Med Mex 2003, 139:91-102.
• [33]Shotorbani S, Zimmerman F, Bell J, Ward D, Assef N: Attitudes and intentions of future health care providers toward abortion provision. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004, 36(2):58-63.
• [34]Kestler E: Obstetrician–gynecologists’ knowledge of and attitudes toward medical abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012, 116:120-123.
• [35]Pace L, Grossman D, Chávez S, Távara L, Lara D, Guerrero Vásquez R: Legal abortion in Peru: knowledge, attitudes and practices among a group of physician leaders. Gac Med Mex 2006, 142:91-94.
• [36]Faundes A, Alves Duarte G, Andalaft Neto J, Olivatto A, Martins Simone R: Conhecimento, Opinião e Conduta de Ginecologistas e Obstetras Brasileiros sobre o Aborto Induzido. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2004, 26(2):89-96.
• [37]Oppezzi M: Percepciones, Prácticas y Actitudes de los Profesionales Médicos en la Atención del Aborto: Un Estudio en el Subsector Público de Salud de la Provincia del Neuquén. Programa de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva Subsecretaria de Salud - Provincia de Neuquén y Programa Nacional de Salud Reproductiva y Procreación Responsable; 2011. In press
• [38]Guillaume A, Lerner S: El aborto en América Latina y El Caribe: Una Revisión de la Literatura de los Años 1990–2005. Paris: Centro de Estudios de Población y Desarrollo (CEPED); 2007.
• [39]Petracci M: Hoja informativa 1: Opinión Pública Sobre Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo y Despenalización del Aborto en la Argentina y América Latina. http://www.despenalizacion.org.ar/pdf/Hojas_Informativas/01_Petracci.pdf webcite (accesed September 23 2014)