The leaf angle distribution of natural plant populations: assessing the canopy with a novel software tool

Plant Methods

Uwe Rascher¹  Hanno Scharr¹  Francisco Pinto-Espinosa¹  Mark Müller-Linow¹ 

[1] Institute of Bio and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str, Jülich 52425, Germany

关键词: Leaf angle distribution;    Leaf angle;    Structural canopy straits;    Canopy;    Leaf modeling;    Leaf segmentation;    3-d reconstruction;    Stereo imaging;   

Others  :  1162825
DOI  :  10.1186/s13007-015-0052-z

 received in 2014-08-30, accepted in 2015-01-29,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Three-dimensional canopies form complex architectures with temporally and spatially changing leaf orientations. Variations in canopy structure are linked to canopy function and they occur within the scope of genetic variability as well as a reaction to environmental factors like light, water and nutrient supply, and stress. An important key measure to characterize these structural properties is the leaf angle distribution, which in turn requires knowledge on the 3-dimensional single leaf surface. Despite a large number of 3-d sensors and methods only a few systems are applicable for fast and routine measurements in plants and natural canopies. A suitable approach is stereo imaging, which combines depth and color information that allows for easy segmentation of green leaf material and the extraction of plant traits, such as leaf angle distribution.

Results

We developed a software package, which provides tools for the quantification of leaf surface properties within natural canopies via 3-d reconstruction from stereo images. Our approach includes a semi-automatic selection process of single leaves and different modes of surface characterization via polygon smoothing or surface model fitting. Based on the resulting surface meshes leaf angle statistics are computed on the whole-leaf level or from local derivations. We include a case study to demonstrate the functionality of our software. 48 images of small sugar beet populations (4 varieties) have been analyzed on the base of their leaf angle distribution in order to investigate seasonal, genotypic and fertilization effects on leaf angle distributions. We could show that leaf angle distributions change during the course of the season with all varieties having a comparable development. Additionally, different varieties had different leaf angle orientation that could be separated in principle component analysis. In contrast nitrogen treatment had no effect on leaf angles.

Conclusions

We show that a stereo imaging setup together with the appropriate image processing tools is capable of retrieving the geometric leaf surface properties of plants and canopies. Our software package provides whole-leaf statistics but also a local estimation of leaf angles, which may have great potential to better understand and quantify structural canopy traits for guided breeding and optimized crop management.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Müller-Linow et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Rascher U, Nedbal L. Dynamics of plant photosynthesis under fluctuating natural conditions. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9:671-8.
• [2]Rosa LM, Forseth IN. Diurnal patterns of soybean leaf inclination angles and azimuthal orientation under different levels of UVb radiation. Agric For Meteorol. 1995; 78:107-19.
• [3]Wofford TJ, Allen FL. Variation in leaflet orientation among soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 1982; 22:999-1004.
• [4]Bawhey CI, Grant RH, Gao W. Digital measurement of heliotropic leaf response in soybean cultivars and leaf exposure to solar uvb radiation. Agric For Meteorol. 2003; 120:161-76.
• [5]Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ. 2006; 29:315-30.
• [6]Schurr U, Walter A, Rascher U. Functional dynamics of plant growth and photosynthesis ? from steady-state to dynamics ? from homogeneity to heterogeneity. Plant Cell Environ. 2006; 29:340-52.
• [7]Biskup B, Kuesters R, Scharr H, Walter A, Rascher U. Quantification of plant surface structures from small baseline stereo images to measure the three-dimensional surface from the leaf to the canopy scale. Nova Acta Leopoldina. 2009; 96(357):31-47.
• [8]Loomis RS, Williams WA, Duncan WG. Community architecture and the productivity of terrestrial plant communities. New York Academic, New York, USA; 1967.
• [9]Rascher U, Biskup B, Leakey ADB, McGrath JM, Ainsworth EA. Altered physiological function, not structure, drives increased radiation-use efficiency of soybean grown at elevated CO2. Photosynth Res. 2010; 105(1):15-25.
• [10]Zhu X-GZ, Long SP, Ort DR. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61:235-61.
• [11]Hosoi F, Omasa K. Factors contributing to accuracy in the estimation of the woody canopy leaf area densitiy profile using 3d portable LIDAR imaging. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58:3463-73.
• [12]Hosoi F, Nakai Y, Omasa K. Estimation and error analysis of woody canopy leaf area density profiles using 3-d airborne and ground-based scanning lidar remote-sensing techniques. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2010; 48(5):2215-23.
• [13]Hosoi F, Omasa K. Estimation of vertical plant area density profiles in a rice canopy at different growth stages by high-resolution portable scanning LIDAR with a lightweight mirror. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens. 2012; 74:11-9.
• [14]Bellasio C, Olejnickova J, Tesar R, Sebela D, Nedbal L. Computer reconstruction of plant growth and chlorophyll fluorescence emission in three spatial dimensions. Sensors. 2012; 12:1052-71.
• [15]Mullen JL, Weinig C, Hangarter RP. Shade avoidance and the regulation of leaf inclination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2006; 29:1099-106.
• [16]Dornbusch T, Lorrain S, Kuznetsov D, Fortier A, Liechti R, Xenarios I et al.. Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in Arabidopsis - a novel phenotyping approach using laser scanning. Func Plant Biol. 2012; 39:860-9.
• [17]Watanabe T, Hanan JS, Room PM, Hasegawa T, Nakagawa H, Takahashi W. Rice morphogenesis and plant architecture: Measurement, specification and the reconstruction of structural development by 3d architectural modelling. Ann Bot. 2005; 95:1131-43.
• [18]Vos J, Evers JB, Buck-Sorlin GH, Andrieu B, Chelle M, de Visser PHB. Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. J Exp Bot. 2010; 61(8):2101-15.
• [19]Sarlikioti V, de Visser PHB, Marcelis LFM. Exploring the spatial distribution of light interception and photosynthesis of canopies by means of a functional-structural plant model. Ann Bot. 2011; 107:875-83.
• [20]Deckmyn G, Nijs I, Ceulemans R. A simple method to determine leaf angles of grass species. J Exp Bot. 2000; 51(349):1467-70.
• [21]Ivanov N, Boissard P, Chapron M, Valery P. Estimation of the height and angles of orientation of the upper leaves in the maize canopy using stereovision. Agronomie. 1994; 2:183-94.
• [22]Hosoi F, Omasa K. Voxel-based 3-d modeling of individual trees for estimating leaf area density using high-resolution portable scanning LIDAR. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2006; 44:3610-8.
• [23]Pisek J, Ryu Y, Alikas K. Estimating leaf inclination and g-function from leveled digital camera photography in broadleaf canopies. Trees. 2011; 25:919-24.
• [24]Duvick DN, Smith JSC, Cooper M. Long-Term Selection in a Commercial Hybrid Maize Breeding Program. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA; 2010.
• [25]Ford ED, Cocke A, Horton L, Fellner E, Van Volkenburgh M. Estimation, variation and importance of leaf curvature in zea mays hybrids. Agric Forest Meteorol. 2008; 148(10):1598-610.
• [26]Paproki A, Sirault X, Berry S, Furbank R, Fripp J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3d plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12(63):13.
• [27]Biskup B, Scharr H, Schurr U, Rascher U. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 2007; 30(10):1299-308.
• [28]Ehlert D, Heisig M, Adamek R. Assessment of a Laser Scanner on Agricultural Machinery. In: Engineering for Rural Development - 9th International Scientific Conference. University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia: 2010. p. 32–36.
• [29]Sanz-Cortiella R, Llorens-Calveras J, Escolà A, Arnó-Satorra J, Ribes-Dasi M, Masip-Vilalta J et al.. Innovative LIDAR 3d dynamic measurement system to estimate fruit-tree leaf area. Sensors. 2011; 11(6):5769-91.
• [30]Lumme J, Karjalainen M, Kaartinen H, Kukko A, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, et al. Terrestrial laser scanning of agricultural crops. In: Proceedings of the XXI. IS-PRS Congress: Silk Road for Information from Imagery. Bejing, China: 2008. p. 563–66.
• [31]Bouguet J-Y. Calibration toolbox for Matlab. 2005. http://vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/index.html.
• [32]Fusiello A, Trucco E, Verri A. A compact algorithm for rectification of stereo pairs. Mach Vis Appl. 2000; 12(1):16-22.
• [33]Vedaldi A, Fulkerson B. VLFeat: An Open and Portable Library of Computer Vision Algorithms. 2008. http://www.vlfeat.org/.
• [34]Engwirda D. MESH2D - Automatic Mesh Generation. 2009. http://www.mathworks.de/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25555-mesh2d-automatic-mesh-generation.
• [35]Agoston M. Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling: Implementation and Algorithms. Springer, London, UK; 2005.
• [36]Shapiro L, Stockman G. Computer Vision. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA; 2001.
• [37]Hartley R, Zisserman A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2003.
• [38]Zhang Z. Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations. In: ICCV. Kerkyra, Corfu, Greece: 1999. p. 666–73.
• [39]Zhang Z. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000; 22:1330-4.
• [40]Brown MZ, Burschka D, Hager GD. Advances in computational stereo. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2003; 25(8):993-1008.
• [41]Scharstein D, Szeliski R. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. Int J Comput Vis. 2002; 47(1-3):7-42.
• [42]Trucco E, Verri A. Introductory Techniques for 3D Computer Vision. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA; 1998.
• [43]Lowe DG. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis. 2004; 60(2):91-110.
• [44]Fusiello A, Roberto V, Trucco E. Efficient Stereo with Multiple Windowing. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Juan, Puerto Rico: 1997. p. 858–863.
• [45]Fua P. Combining Stereo and Monocular Information to Compute Dense Depth Maps that Preserve Depth Discontinuities. In: 12th International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence: 1991. p. 1292–1298.
• [46]Fua P. A parallel stereo algorithm that produces dense depth maps and preserves image features. Mach Vis Appl. 1993; 6:35-49.
• [47]Khongsab P. Signal processing and performance evaluation of a PMD camera for space docking. Master’s thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Kiruna; 2009.
• [48]Lejeune A, Piérard S, Van Droogenbroeck M, Verly J. A new jump edge detection method for 3D cameras. In: International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D). Liège, Belgium: 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/103459.
• [49]Huang T, Yang G, Tang G. A fast two-dimensional median filtering algorithm. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process. 1979; 27(1):13-8.
• [50]Ma Z, He K, Wei Y, Sun J, Wu E. Constant Time Weighted Median Filtering for Stereo Matching and Beyond. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Sydney, NSW, Australia: 2013. p. 49–56.
• [51]Felzenszwalb PF, Huttenlocher DP. Efficiently computing a good segmentation. In: Proceedings DARPA Image Understanding Workshop. Monterey, California, USA: 1998. p. 251–8.
• [52]Desbrun M, Meyer M, Schröder P, Barr AH. Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA; 1999.
• [53]Zhang Y, Hamza AB. Vertex-based diffusion for 3-d mesh denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007; 16(4):1036-45.
• [54]Hansen GA, Douglass RW, Zardecki A. Mesh enhancement: selected elliptic methods, foundations and applications. London Imperial College Press, London, UK; 2005.
• [55]Delaunay BN. Sur la sphere vide. Bull Acad Sci USSR. 1934; 7:793-800.
• [56]de Berg M, Cheong O, van Kreveld M, Overmars M. Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications. Springer, London, UK; 2008.
• [57]Golub G, van Loan C. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 1996.
• [58]Fischler M, Bolles R. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Comm ACM. 1981; 24(6):381-95.
• [59]Welles JM. Some indirect methods of estimating canopy structure. Remote Sensing Rev. 1990; 5:31-43.
• [60]Breda NJJ. Ground-based measurement of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54(392):2403-17.
• [61]Li G, Zucker SW. Differential Geometric Consistency Extends Stereo to Curved Surfaces. ECCV (3). Springer, London, UK; 2006.