Engaging the normative question in the H5N1 avian influenza mutation experiments

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine

Norman K Swazo¹ 

[1] College of Science and General Studies, Alfaisal University, PO Box 50927, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia

关键词: Ethics;    H5N1;    NSABB;    Kawaoka;    Fouchier;    Influenza;   

Others  :  816412
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-5341-8-12

 received in 2012-10-02, accepted in 2013-09-02,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

In recent time there has been ample discussion concerning censorship of research conducted in two labs involved in avian influenza virus research. Much of the debate has centered on the question whether the methods and results should reach to open disclosure given the “dual use” nature of this research which can be used for nefarious purposes.

Methods

This paper reviews the discussion to date but centers on epistemological issues associated with initial justification of this research and what this entails for continuation of this research despite US governmental biosecurity concerns. The question here is whether there was reasonable moral warrant for genetic alteration of the H5N1 influenza virus.

Conclusion

The paper concludes with philosophical (ethical) justification for continuation of this research.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Swazo; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Editorial. An engineered doomsday. The New York Times; 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/an-engineered-doomsday.html?_r=0 webcite. Accessed 25 February 2012
• [2]Osterholm Michael T, Henderson Donald A: Life sciences at a crossroads: respiratory transmissible H5N1. Science 2012., 335
• [3]Berns Kenneth I, et al.: Adaptations of avian flu virus are a cause for concern. Nature 2012. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/482153a.html webcite accessed 02 February 2012
• [4]Fidler David P: Risky research and human health: the influenza H5N1 research controversy and international Law. Insights (American Society of International Law) 2012., 16(2)
• [5]Fouchier R: ASM biodefense and emerging diseases research meeting, panel discussion. 2012. https://www.asm.org/index.php/membership1/71-membership/archives/834-biodefense-meetings-historical-list webcite
• [6]Cohen J, Malakoff D: NSABB members react to request for second look at H5N1 Flu studies. ScienceInsider 2012.
• [7]Kerkhove V, Maria D, Mumford E, Mounts AW, Joseph Bresee AW, Sowath L, Bridges CB, Otte J: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1): pathways of exposure at the animal-human interface, a systematic review. PLoS One 2011, 6(1):e14582.
• [8]Horimoto T, Kawaoka Y: Pandemic threat posed by avian influenza A viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001, 14(1):129-149.
• [9]Eckroade RJ, Bachin LAS: Proceedings of the second international symposium on avian influenza. Proceedings of the second international symposium on avian influenza 1987, 22-32.
• [10]Commission of the European Communities: Impact assessment avian influenza. COM.171.
• [11]Macleod A: Economic and social impacts of avian influenza. Food and Agricultural Organization; 2005. http://www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload//211939/Economic-and-social-impacts-of-avian-influenza-Geneva.pdf webcite
• [12]Perez Daniel R: H5N1 Debates: hung up on the wrong questions. Science 2012. Policy Forum. 335
• [13]Sims LD, et al.: Avian influenza in Hong Kong 1997–2002. Avian Dis 2003, 47(3 Suppl):832-838.
• [14]Erasmus Medical Center: Avian influenza could evolve into dangerous human virus. 2011. http://www.erasmusmc.nl/corp_home/corp_news-center/2011/2011-11 webcite. Accessed 08 January 2012
• [15]Fouchier Ron A, Sander H, Albert DME O: Restricted data on influenza H5N1 virus transmission. Science express policy forum. 2012. http://www.sciencexpress.org webcite. Accessed 07 February 2012
• [16]Roos R: Live debate airs major divisions in H5N1 research battle. 2012. [Center for infectious disease research and policy] http://www.cidrap.umn.edu webcite. Accessed 07 February 2012
• [17]Wang Tala T, Parides Michael K, Palese P: Seroevidence for H5N1 influenza infections in humans: meta-analysis. Science 2012. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/02/22/science.1218888 webcite. Accessed 25 February 2012
• [18]Fischman J: Overstated risks of censored bird-flu papers—and overstated benefits. The Chronicle of Higher Education; 2012.
• [19]Osterholm Michael T, Kelley Nicholas S: Mammalian-transmissible H5N1 influenza: facts and perspective. mBio 2012., 3(2) published online 24 February 2012; Accessed 25 February 2012
• [20]Roos R: NSABB: studies show how H5N1 can jump natural barrier. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy; 2012. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu webcite. Accessed 07 February 2012
• [21]Keim Paul S: The NSABB recommendations: rationale, impact, and implications. mBio 2012, 3:1. http://mbio.asm.org webcite. Accessed 11 February 2012
• [22]Casadevall A, Shenk T: The H5N1 manuscript redaction controversy. mBio 2012, 3:1. http://mbio.asm.org webcite. Accessed 11 February 2012
• [23]Racaniello Vincent R: Should science be in the public domain. mBio 2012, 3:1. http://mbio.asm.org webcite. Accessed 11 February 2012
• [24]Taubenberger Jeffery K: Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes. Nature 2005, 437(6):889-892.
• [25]Alberts B: Statements regarding publication of HN1 avian influenza research. Science 2011. http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2011/1220herfst.shtml webcite
• [26]Fouchier Ron A, Garcia-Sastre A, Kawaoka Y: Correspondence: pause on avian flu transmission studies. Nature 2012, 481:20-443.
• [27]Fouchier Ron A: Pause on avian flu transmission research. Sci Expr 2012. http://www.scienceexpress.org webcite
• [28]Banerjee N: NSC wants rules on research that could lead to biological weapons. 2012. http://ecollegetimes.com/student-life/nsc-wants-rules-on-research webcite. Accessed on 21 February 2012
• [29]Office of Biotechnology Activities, National Institutes of Health: United States government policy for oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern. http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/biosecurity/PDF/United_States_Government_Policy_for_Oversight_of_DURC_FINAL_version_032812.pdf webcite. Accessed 01 April 2012
• [30]Office of Science Policy: Office of Biotechnology activities. National Institutes of Health; 2012. http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/about_nsabb.html webcite. Accessed 04 January 2012
• [31]NSABB: Meeting of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to review revised manuscripts on transmissibility of a/H5N1 influenza virus. 2012.
• [32]Imai M: Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortment H5HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets. Nature 2012. published online 02 May 2012. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature10831.html webcite
• [33]Herfst S, et al.: Airborne transmission of influenza a/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science 2012, 1534-1541. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1534.abstract webcite
• [34]Enserink M: Flu researcher Ron Fouchier: ‘It’s a pity that it has to come to this. Science Insider 2012. http://news.sciencemag.org; webcite Accessed 07 February 2012
• [35]Inglesby Thomas V, Cicero A, Henderson DA: The risk of engineering a highly transmissible H5N1 virus. Center for Biosecurity, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; 2012. [Editorial] http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/website/resources/publications/2011/2011-12-15-editorial-engineering-H5N1; webcite accessed 25 February 2012
• [36]Ehni H-J: Dual use and the ethical responsibility of scientists. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2008, 56:147-152.
• [37]Center for Disease Control: Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories. 5th edition. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/index.htm webcite. Accessed 07 January 2012
• [38]Fouchier R: ASM biodefense and emerging diseases research meeting. 2012. [Panel Discussion] https://www.asm.org/index.php/membership1/71-membership/archives/834-biodefense-meetings-historical-list webcite
• [39]U.S. Department of Agriculture: 2002 USDA security policies and procedures for biosafety level-3 facilities, departmental manual. Washington D.C: Agricultural Research Service; 2002. http://www.ocio.usda.gov/directives/doc/DM9610-001.htm; webcite accessed 09 January 2012
• [40]Murillo Lisa N: Ferret-transmissible influenza a(H5N1) virus: Let us err on the side of caution. mBio 2012., 3(2)
• [41]Imperiale Michael J, Hanna III, Michael G: Biosafety considerations of mammalian-transmissible H5N1 influenza. mBio 2012., 3(2)
• [42]Casadevall A, Shenk T: Mammalian-transmissible H5N1 virus: containment level and case fatality ratio. mBio 2012, 3(2):1-2.
• [43]García-Sastre A: Working safely with H5N1 viruses. mBio 2012, 3(2):1-2.
• [44]Racaniello V: The real danger is research: an uneasy nexus between science and security. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Commentary; 2012. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Real-Danger-Is-to-Research/130345 webcite
• [45]Fauci A: ASM biodefense and emerging diseases research meeting panel discussion. 2012. https://www.asm.org/index.php/membership1/71-membership/archives/834-biodefense-meetings-historical-list webcite
• [46]World Health Organization: WHO concerned that new H5N1 influenza research could undermine the pandemic influenza preparedness framework. Media Centre Statement; 2011. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2011/pip_framework webcite. Accessed 31 December 2011
• [47]World Health Organization: Media centre news release. Public health, influenza experts agree H5N1 research critical, but extend delay. 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2012/h5n1_research_20120217/en/index.html# webcite. Accessed 18 February 2012
• [48]National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: (Influenza): reverse genetics: building Flu vaccines piece by piece. 2012. http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/Flu/Research/vaccineResearch; webcite Accessed 09 January 2012
• [49]Neumann G, Hatta M, Kawaoka Y: Reverse genetics for the control of avian influenza. Avian Dis 2003, 47(3 Suppl):882-887.
• [50]Horimoto T, Kawaoka Y: Strategies for developing vaccines against H5N1 influenza a viruses. Trends Mol Med 2006, 12(11):506-14.
• [51]Neumann G, Fujii K, Kino Y, Kawaoka Y: An improved reverse genetics system for influenza a virus generation and its implications for vaccine production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(46):16825-9.
• [52]Penn M: Flight lessons. Wisconsin; 2006:24. http://www.uwalumni.com/home/onwisconsin/archives/winter06/winter06.aspx webcite
• [53]Neumann G, Kawaoka Y: Host range restriction and pathogenicity in the context of influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis 2006, 12(6):881-886.
• [54]Shinya K, Ebina M, Yamada S, Ono M, Kasai N, Kawaoka Y: Brief communications: avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature 2006, 440:435-436.
• [55]Kawaoka Y: H5N1: flu transmission work is urgent. Nature 2012, 482:155. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7384/full/nature10884.html webcite. Accessed 11 February 2012
• [56]Grady D, McNeil Donald G: Debate persists on deadly flu made airborne. The New York Times/International Herald Tribune; 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/27/science/debate-persists-on-the-deadly-flu-made-airbone.html?ref=health webcite
• [57]Brown E: Studies of deadly H5N1 bird flu mutations test scientific ethics. Los Angeles Times; http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/26/science/la-sci-bird-flu-20111227 webcite. Accessed 31 December 2011
• [58]Carvajal D: Security in H5N1 bird flu study was paramount, scientist says. The New York Times International Herald Tribune; 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/health/security-in-h5n1-bird-flu-study-was-paramount-scientist-says.html?pagewanted=all webcite
• [59]Fouchier Ron A, Sander H, Albert DME O: Restricted data on influenza H5N1 virus transmission restricted data on influenza H5N1 virus transmission. Sci Expr Policy Forum 2012. http://www.sciencexpress.org webcite. Accessed 07 February 2012
• [60]Palese P: Don’t censor life-saving science. Nature 2012, 481:115.
• [61]Taubenherger Jeffery K: Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes. Nature 2005, 437:889-893.
• [62]Sorrell EM: Predicting ‘airborne’ influenza viruses: (trans-)mission impossible? Curr OpinVirol 2011, 1:635-642.
• [63]Van Aken J: Is it wise to resurrect a deadly virus? Heredity 2007, 98:1-2.
• [64]Public Broadcasting System/WGBH: Frontline: plague war: interview with Michael Osterholm. http://www/pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/plague/interviews/osterholm; webcite Accessed 07 February 2012
• [65]Living on earth. Transcript interview with Michael Osterholm. 2012. http://www.loe.org/shows webcite. Accessed 07 February 2012
• [66]Osterholm M: Letter to Dr. Amy Patterson. Associate Director for Science Policy, NIH; 2012. http://wwww.scienceinsider/NSABB%20letter%20final2041212_3.pdf webcite. (no longer accessible online)
• [67]Bromberger S: Science and the forms of ignorance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1992:117-122. [On what we know we Don’t know: explanation, theory, linguistics, and how questions shape them] Online version; http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/bromberger-corpus/On-What-We-Know-We-Don’t-Know.pdf webcite
• [68]Parfit D: On what matters volume 1. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
• [69]Barrett J, Kyle SP: Prediction. New York: Routledge; 2012. [The philosophy of science: An encyclopedia]
• [70]Kaufmann S: Probabilities of conditionals. Edited by Hastings R, Jackson B, Zvolenszky Z. Ithaca: Cornell University: SALT XI; 2001:248-267.
• [71]MacFarlane J: Future contingents and relative truth. The Philos Q 53 2003, 212:321-336.
• [72]Parfit D: Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon; 1984.
• [73]Pfeifer J, Sarkar S: The philosophy of science: An encyclopedia. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1798/1/bio_info.pdf webcite
• [74]Algica Paul D: Prediction, explanation and the epistemology of future studies. Futures 2003, 35(10):1027-1040.
• [75]Fraasen Bas V: The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1980.
• [76]Sarewitz D, Pielke R: Prediction in science and policy. Technol Soc 1999, 21:121-133.
• [77]Kleinman Daniel L: Science and technology in society: from biotechnology to the internet. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.