An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine

Sheela Saravanan¹ 

[1] Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Institute, University Medical Center, Humboldtallee 36, Goettingen D-37073, Germany

关键词: Bio-power;    Human relationships;    Trust;    Asymmetric vulnerability;    Capacity;    Manifestations of exploitation;    Commercial surrogacy;   

Others  :  816419
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-5341-8-10

 received in 2012-01-25, accepted in 2013-08-05,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

The socio-ethical concerns regarding exploitation in commercial surrogacy are premised on asymmetric vulnerability and the commercialization of women’s reproductive capacity to suit individualistic motives. In examining the exploitation argument, this article reviews the social contract theory that describes an individual as an ‘economic man’ with moral and/or political motivations to satisfy individual desires. This study considers the critique by feminists, who argue that patriarchal and medical control prevails in the surrogacy contracts. It also explores the exploitative dynamics amongst actors in the light of Baier’s conceptualization of trust and human relationship, within which both justice and exploitation thrive, and Foucault’s concept of bio-power. Drawing on these concepts, this paper aims to investigate the manifestations of exploitation in commercial surrogacy in the context of trust, power and experiences of actors, using a case study of one clinic in India. The actors’ experiences are evaluated at different stages of the surrogacy process: recruitment, medical procedures, living in the surrogate home, bonding with the child and amongst actors, financial dealings, relinquishment and post-relinquishment.

This study applies ethnomethodology to identify phenomena as perceived by the actors in a situation, giving importance to their interpretations of the rules that make collective activity possible. The methods include semi-structured interviews, discussions, participant observation and explanation of the phenomena from the actors’ perspectives. Between August 2009 and April 2010, 13 surrogate mothers (SMs), 4 intended parents (IPs) and 2 medical practitioners (MPs) from one clinic in Western India were interviewed.

This study reveals that asymmetries of capacity amongst the MPs, SMs, IPs and surrogate agents (SAs) lead to a network of trust and designation of powers through rules, bringing out the relevance of Baier’s conceptualization of asymmetric vulnerability, trust and potential exploitation in human relationships. The IPs are exploited, especially in monetary terms. The SMs are relatively the most exploited, given their vulnerability. Their remuneration through surrogacy is significant for them, and their acquired knowledge as ex-surrogates is used for their own benefit and for exploiting others. Foucault’s conceptualization of power is hence relevant, since the ex-SMs re-invest the power of their exploitative experience in exploiting others.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Saravanan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Crompton S: India’s Rise in Medical Tourism. London, Britain: The Times of India; 2007.
• [2]Kannan S: Regulators Eye India’s Surrogacy Sector. India Business Report, BBC World; 18th March 2009.
• [3]Krishnakumar A: Assisted reproductive technology has brought hope to numerous infertile couples in India and many other countries. The Science of ART. Frontline 2003, 20:19.
• [4]MacDermott N: The Babies Made in India for Desperate UK Couples. Daily Mail, UK. 21st May 2009. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1185177/The-babies-India-desperate-UK-couples.html webcite
• [5]MoHFW ICMR: The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill (Draft). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare / Indian Council of Medical Research; 2010.
• [6]Team SAMA: Assisted reproductive technologies: for whose benefit? Economic and Political Review 2009, 44:25-31.
• [7]Sarojini N, Marwah V, Shenoi A: Globalisation of birth markets: a case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India. Globalization and Health 2011, 7:27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Whittaker A: Challenges of medical travel to global regulation: a case study of reproductive travel in Asia. Global Social Policy 2010, 10:396.
• [9]Vora K: Indian transnational surrogacy and the commodification of vital energy. Subjectivity 2009, 28:266-278.
• [10]Pande A: Commercial surrogacy in India: manufacturing a perfect mother‒worker. Signs 2010, 35(4):969-992.
• [11]Hobbes T: On the Citizen. Edited and translated by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
• [12]Rawls J: A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1971.
• [13]Pateman C: The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1988.
• [14]Held V: Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1993.
• [15]Baier A: Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1994.
• [16]Baier A: Trust and antitrust. Ethics 1986, 96:231-260.
• [17]Weber M: Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkley: University of California Press; (1922); 1978.
• [18]Giddens A: The constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1984.
• [19]Foucault M: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon; 1980.
• [20]Shalev C: Birth Power: The Case for Surrogacy. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1989.
• [21]Purdy L: Reproducing Persons. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1996.
• [22]UNESCO: Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Paris; 2006. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001461/146180E.pdf webcite. Accessed on 27th May 2013
• [23]UN General Assembly: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10th December 1948, 217 A (III). http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html webcite
• [24]Hycner RH: Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies 1985, 8:279-303.
• [25]Fraser JA, Barnes M, Biggs HC, Kain VJ: Caring, chaos and the vulnerable family: experiences in caring for newborns of drug-dependent parents. Int J Nurs Stud 2007, 44:1363-1370.
• [26]Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage; 2004.
• [27]Saravanan S, Schicktanz S: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. In Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of Bioethics. Rotterdam: The International Association of Bioethics: Philippines; 2012.
• [28]The Hindu: Post Stringent Norms, Clinical Trials in India Plummet. New Delhi; 2013.